~~III.~~

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

In 2016, we were recognized by the CDP as a leader in carbon management by achieving the Climate “A” list, which puts us in the top 9% of companies participating in CDP’s climate change program worldwide. In addition, we achieved three pioneering firsts:

the industry’s firston-site wind turbine, at our Tilburg, Netherlands manufacturing facility;

the launch of PuraVita™, the world’s first-ever Cradle to Cradle Certified™ fragrance; and

Vetiver Together, a unique partnership to enhance the livelihoods of farmers in Haiti, while securing our supply chain.

Through implementation of our sustainability vision and strategy, we will continue our efforts to further embed sustainability throughout our company.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our Board ~~of Directors~~ is responsible for overseeing the management of our Company. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines which set forth our governance principles relating to, among other things:

director independence;

director qualifications and responsibilities;

board structure and meetings;

management succession; and

the ~~Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)~~CEO evaluation and succession process.

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a person that has served for twelve consecutive, full annual terms on our Board cannot continue to serve as a director following the twelfth year of service, ~~unless (i)~~ unless:

such person is one of our ~~employees~~employees; or ~~(ii)~~

our Board has made a determination that the nomination of such person would be in the best interests of our Company and our shareholders.

A director’s first full annual term begins on the date he or she is first elected at an annual meeting of shareholders and continues until the next annual meeting of shareholders. Unless a director is an employee of our Company, prior to the conclusion of the twelfth full annual term, the director shall submit his or her resignation as a director effective immediately prior to that year’s annual meeting of shareholders.

The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews our Corporate Governance Guidelines annually, and recommends changes to the Board as appropriate. A copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines is available through the ~~Investor -~~ Investor—Leadership & ~~Governance -~~ Governance—Governance link on our website, www.iff.com.

~~www.iff.com~~.

Independence of Directors

The Board has affirmatively determined that each of our current directors (other than Mr. Fibig, our CEO) meets our independence requirements and those of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards.

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board undertakes an annual review of director independence, which includes a review of each director’s responses to questionnaires asking about any relationships with us. This review is designed to identify and evaluate any transactions or relationships between a director or any member of his or her immediate family and the Company or members of our senior management.

16IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Independent Directors
Marcello V. Bottoli		Roger W. Ferguson, Jr

Dr. Linda Buck		Christina Gold

Michael L. Ducker		Henry W. Howell, Jr.

David R. Epstein		Katherine M. Hudson

John F. Ferraro		Dale F. Morrison

In the ordinary course of business, transactions may occur between the Company and entities with which some of our directors are or have been affiliated. During ~~2015,~~2016, in connection with its evaluation of director independence, our Board reviewed transactions between the Company and any company that has any of our directors or family members of our directors serving as executive officers. Specifically, Mr. Ducker serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of FedEx Freight, a shipping company that provides services to the Company. We reviewed this commercial relationship and found that all ~~the~~ transactions between the Company and FedEx were made in the ordinary course of business and were negotiated at arm’s length. As a result, our Board determined that this commercial relationship did not impair Mr. Ducker’s independence.

~~Other Information~~

On August 5, 2008, the SEC approved a settlement with Ernst & Young LLP and two of its partners, including Mr. Ferraro, relating to auditor independence issues arising out of business relationships between Ernst & Young LLP and an individual who was also a member of the board of directors of three of its audit clients. The matter arose out of actions taken by Mr. Ferraro in 2002 in his role as Vice Chairman of Ernst & Young LLP. Ernst & Young LLP and Mr. Ferraro resolved that matter by way of a negotiated settlement in which the respondents neither admitted nor denied the underlying allegations and accepted an administrative cease and desist order. The negotiated resolution did not involve any suspension, fines or other sanctions against Mr. Ferraro. Mr. Ferraro thereafter remained a partner in good standing at Ernst & Young through January 2015. Our Board of Directors took into consideration all factors regarding Mr. Ferraro’s character and experience and believes that he is a significant asset to the Board.

11
~~Table of Contents~~

Board Leadership Structure

As stated in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board does not have a policy that requires a separation of the Chairman of the Board (“Chairman”) and CEO positions. The Board believes that it is important to have the flexibility to make this determination from time to time based on the particular facts and circumstances then affecting our business.

Currently, we combine the positions of Chairman and CEO. We believe that the CEO, as the Company’s chief executive, is in the best position to fulfill the Chairman’s responsibilities, including those related to identifying emerging issues facing our Company, and communicating essential information to the Board about our performance and strategies. We also believe that the combined role of Chairman and CEO provides us with a distinct leader and allows us to present a single, uniform voice to our customers, business partners, shareholders and employees. If at any point in time the Board feels that its current leadership structure may be better served by separating the roles of Chairman and CEO, it may then determine to separate these positions.

In order to mitigate potential disadvantages of a combined Chairman and CEO, the Board has created the position of Lead Director to facilitate and strengthen the Board’s independent oversight of our performance, strategy and succession planning and to promote effective governance standards. The independent directors of the Board elect a Lead Director from among the independent directors. Our current Lead Director is Mr. Morrison.

~~The duties of our Lead Director include:~~

presiding at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman and CEO is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors, and providing prompt feedback regarding those meetings to the Chairman and CEO;

~~approving, and providing suggestions for, Board meeting agendas, with the involvement of the Chairman and CEO and input from other directors;~~

~~serving as the liaison between the Chairman and CEO and the independent directors;~~

~~monitoring significant issues occurring between Board meetings and assuring Board involvement when appropriate; and~~

~~ensuring, in consultation with the Chairman and CEO, the adequate and timely exchange of information between our management and the Board.~~

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 17

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Duties of our Lead Director

Ø Presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman and CEO is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors, and provides prompt feedback regarding those meetings to the Chairman and CEO;

Ø Approves and provides suggestions for Board meeting agendas, with the involvement of the Chairman and CEO and input from other directors;

Ø Serves as liaison between the Chairman and CEO and the independent directors;

Ø Monitors significant issues occurring between Board meetings and assures Board involvement when appropriate; and

Ø Ensures, in consultation with the Chairman and CEO, the adequate and timely exchange of information between the management team and the Board.

Board Committees

Our Board has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee, each of which operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. Each Committee reviews its charter at least annually and recommends charter changes to the Board as appropriate. In December ~~2015,~~2016, each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee reviewed its charter, and amended it where appropriate. Each Committee charter provides that the Committee will annually review its performance. A current copy of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee charters is available through the ~~Investor -~~ Investor—Leadership & ~~Governance -~~ Governance—Governance link on our website, ~~www.iff.com~~.

~~Table of Contents~~

www.iff.com.

The table below provides the current and expected membership and chairperson for each of our Committees and identifies our current Lead Director.



Name		Audit		Compensation		Nominating and Governance	Lead Director
Marcello V. Bottoli	X¹	X¹ ●
~~Dr. Linda Buck~~					X
~~Michael L. Ducker~~ Dr. Linda Buck		X				●
~~David R. Epstein~~	X
Michael L. Ducker				●
~~Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.~~
David R. Epstein		~~X (Chair)~~●
~~John F. Ferraro~~	~~X (Chair elect)~~¹
Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.
~~Christina Gold~~			X		X
~~Henry W. Howell, Jr.~~	X John F. Ferraro		~~X (Chair)~~
~~Katherine M. Hudson~~	~~X (Chair)~~¹	X¹

Christina Gold				●

Henry W. Howell, Jr.		●				●

Katherine M. Hudson				●

Dale F. Morrison	X	X¹ ●	X	X●		●	●

LOGO = Committee ~~member~~

1 = Effective immediately following the 2016 Annual Meeting, if elected to our Board of Directors (i) Mr. Bottoli will become a member of the Audit Committee and rotate off the Compensation Committee, (ii) Mr. Ferraro will become Chair ~~of the Audit Committee, (iii) Ms. Hudson will become a member of the Compensation Committee and rotate off the Audit Committee and (iv) Mr. Morrison will become a member of the Compensation Committee.~~

18IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board and Committee Meetings

Our Board held ~~five~~six meetings during ~~2015.~~2016. The Audit Committee held ~~seven~~eight meetings, the Compensation Committee held five meetings and the Nominating and Governance Committee held ~~six~~five meetings during ~~2015. Each~~2016. During 2016, overall attendance was 100% of ~~our~~Board meetings and 93% of total Committee meetings. All incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the total ~~meetings of the~~ Board and ~~Committees~~Committee meetings on which he or she served during ~~2015.~~2016. All of our directors who were serving on the day of last year’s annual meeting of shareholders attended that meeting. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, unless there are mitigating circumstances, such as medical, family or business emergencies, Board members should endeavor to participate ~~(either in person or by telephone)~~ in all Board meetings and all Committee meetings of which the director is a member and to attend our annual meeting of shareholders. Ournon-employee directors, all of whom are currently independent, meet in executive session, without the presence of any corporate officer or member of management, in conjunction with regular meetings of the Board and Committees. During ~~2015,~~2016, ournon-employee directors met in executive session as part of every regularly scheduled Board and Committee meeting.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 19

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Audit Committee

~~Responsibilities~~

~~The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include overseeing and reviewing:~~

~~the financial reporting process and the integrity of our financial statements, capital structure and related financial information;~~

~~our internal control environment, systems and performance;~~

~~the audit process followed by our independent accountant and our internal auditors;~~

~~the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent accountant and our internal auditors;~~

our independent accountant's qualifications, performance and independence, and whether it should be rotated, considering the advisability and potential impact of selecting a different independent public accountant; and

13
~~Table of Contents~~

~~the procedures for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations and with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.~~
Additional responsibilities include assisting the Board in overseeing and reviewing enterprise-wide risks and the policies and practices established to manage such risks, in particular as they relate to financial risk, cybersecurity and information security risk generally.
Under procedures adopted by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee reviews and pre-approves all audit and non-audit services performed by our independent accountant. The Audit Committee may, when it deems appropriate, delegate certain of its responsibilities to one or more Audit Committee members or subcommittees.
~~Independence and Financial Expertise~~
~~The Board reviewed the background, experience and independence of the current Audit Committee members and based on this review, the Board determined that each member of the Audit Committee:~~
~~meets the independence requirements of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards;~~
~~meets the enhanced independence standards for audit committee members required by the SEC;~~
~~is financially literate, knowledgeable and qualified to review financial statements; and~~
~~qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules.~~
~~Compensation Committee~~
~~Responsibilities~~
~~The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include:~~
~~determining, subject to approval by the independent directors of the Board, the CEO’s compensation;~~
~~reviewing and making determinations regarding compensation of executive officers (other than the CEO) and other members of senior management;~~
reviewing, adopting and recommending to the Board, or shareholders as required, general compensation and benefits policies, plans and programs, and overseeing the administration of such policies, plans and programs;
~~reviewing and discussing with management each year the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in our annual proxy statement or annual report on Form 10-K;~~
~~recommending to the Board any changes to the compensation and benefits of non-employee directors; and~~
~~conducting a risk assessment of our overall compensation policies and practices.~~
Under its charter, the Compensation Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in ensuring that long-term and short-term compensation provide performance incentives to management, and that compensation plans are appropriate and competitive and reflect the goals and performance of management and our Company. As discussed in more detail in this proxy statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Compensation Committee considers Company-wide performance against applicable annual and long-term performance goals pre-established by the Compensation Committee, taking into account economic and business conditions, and comparative compensation and benefit performance levels. If the Compensation Committee deems it appropriate, it may delegate certain of its responsibilities to one or more Compensation Committee members or subcommittees.

14
~~Table of Contents~~

~~Independence~~
~~The Board reviewed the background, experience and independence of the Compensation Committee members and based on this review, the Board determined that each member of the Compensation Committee:~~
~~meets the independence requirements of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards;~~
~~is an “outside director” pursuant to the criteria established by the Internal Revenue Service; and~~
~~is a “non-employee” director within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).~~
~~Role of Compensation Consultant~~
The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain compensation consultants or advisors to assist it in evaluating CEO, senior executive and non-employee director compensation. From time to time, management also retains its own outside compensation consultants. In connection with the approval of the 2015 compensation program, including individual targets, as in prior years, the Committee directly engaged W.T. Haigh & Company (“Haigh & Company”) as its independent compensation consultant. From late 2014 through August 2015, Haigh & Company’s work with the Committee included analyses, advice, guidance and recommendations on executive compensation levels versus peers, market trends and incentive plan designs, and the design of our 2015 SAIP. In addition, Haigh & Company provided the Committee with advice and recommendations regarding compensation provided to Ms. Cornell in connection with her hiring. In August 2015, the Compensation Committee directly engaged F.W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) as its independent consultant. In late 2015, FW Cook provided the Committee with advice and a review of director compensation. FW Cook will continue to work with the Committee to provide it with analyses, advice, guidance and recommendations on executive compensation levels versus peers, market trends and incentive plan designs. Both Haigh & Company and FW Cook were engaged exclusively by the Committee on executive and director compensation matters and do not have other consulting arrangements with the Company. The Compensation Committee considered the independence of each of Haigh & Company and FW Cook and determined that no conflicts of interest were raised.
~~Role of Management~~
Our Compensation Committee relies on management for legal, tax, compliance, finance and human resource recommendations, and data and analysis for the design and administration of the compensation, benefits and perquisite programs for our senior executives. The Compensation Committee combines this information with the recommendations and information from its independent compensation consultant.
Our CEO, our Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer (“CHRO”) and our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary (“General Counsel”) generally attend Compensation Committee meetings. CEO performance and compensation are discussed by the Compensation Committee in executive session, with advice and participation from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant as requested by the Compensation Committee. Our CEO and CHRO, without the presence of any other members of senior management, actively participate in the compensation discussions of our senior executives, including making recommendations to the Compensation Committee as to the amount and form of compensation (other than their own).
~~Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation~~
None of the members of the Compensation Committee was at any time during 2015 or at any other time an officer or employee of our Company. None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee.

15
~~Table of Contents~~

~~Nominating and Governance Committee~~
~~Responsibilities~~
~~The Nominating and Governance Committee’s responsibilities include:~~
~~developing and reviewing criteria for the selection of directors, and making recommendations to the Board with respect thereto;~~
reviewing the suitability of directors for continued service, including in case of a resignation tendered by a director, and making recommendations to the Board with respect to their re-nomination or action to be taken with respect to the resignation;
identifying qualified individuals to serve on the Board, reviewing the qualifications of director candidates and recommending to the Board the nominees to be proposed by the Board for election as directors at the annual meeting of shareholders;
~~reviewing director candidates recommended by shareholders for election;~~
~~establishing and reviewing policies pertaining to roles, responsibilities, tenure and removal of directors;~~
~~overseeing CEO and senior management succession plans;~~
~~developing and reviewing the Board and Board committee evaluation process and overseeing the annual CEO evaluation process;~~
~~reviewing and recommending changes to our Corporate Governance Guidelines and monitoring corporate governance issues; and~~
~~reviewing and, if appropriate, approving transactions with related parties.~~
~~The Nominating and Governance Committee may, when it deems appropriate, delegate certain of its responsibilities to one or more Nominating and Governance Committee members or subcommittees.~~
~~Independence~~


Current Members:		Responsibilities

Marcello V. Bottoli David R. Epstein John F. Ferraro (Chair) Henry W. Howell, Jr. Dale F. Morrison Meetings in 2016: 8		The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include overseeing and reviewing: • the financial reporting process and the integrity of our financial statements, capital structure and related financial information; • our internal control environment, systems and performance; • the audit process followed by our independent accountant and our internal auditors; • the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent accountant and our internal auditors; • our independent accountant’s and internal auditors’ qualifications, performance and independence, and whether our independent accountant and internal auditors should be rotated, considering the advisability and potential impact of selecting a different independent accountant or internal auditor; and • the procedures for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations and with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. *Additional responsibilities*.Additional responsibilities include assisting the Board in overseeing and reviewing enterprise-wide risks and the policies and practices established to manage such risks, in particular as they relate to financial risk. Under procedures adopted by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee reviews andpre-approves all audit andnon-audit services performed by our independent accountant. The Audit Committee may, when it deems appropriate, delegate certain of its responsibilities to one or more Audit Committee members or subcommittees. Independence and Financial Expertise The Board reviewed the background, experience and independence of the current Audit Committee members and based on this review, the Board determined that each member of the Audit Committee: • meets the independence requirements of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards; • meets the enhanced independence standards for audit committee members required by the SEC; • is financially literate, knowledgeable and qualified to review financial statements; and • qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under the SEC rules.

20IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Compensation Committee


Current Members:		Responsibilities

Michael Ducker Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. (Chair) Christina Gold Katherine M. Hudson Dale F. Morrison Meetings in 2016: 5		The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include: • determining, subject to approval by the independent directors of the Board, the CEO’s compensation; • reviewing and making determinations regarding compensation of executive officers (other than the CEO) and other members of senior management; • reviewing, adopting and recommending to the Board, or shareholders as required, general compensation and benefits policies, plans and programs, and overseeing the administration of such policies, plans and programs; • reviewing and discussing with management each year the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in our annual proxy statement or annual report on Form10-K; • recommending to the Board any changes to the compensation and benefits ofnon-employee directors; and • conducting a risk assessment of our overall compensation policies and practices. *Authority and Delegation*. Under its charter, the Compensation Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in ensuring that long-term and short-term compensation provide performance incentives to management, and that compensation plans are appropriate and competitive and reflect the goals and performance of management and our Company. As discussed in more detail in this proxy statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Compensation Committee considers Company-wide performance against applicable annual and long-term performance goalspre-established by the Compensation Committee, taking into account economic and business conditions, and comparative compensation and benefit performance levels. If the Compensation Committee deems it appropriate, it may delegate certain of its responsibilities to one or more Compensation Committee members or subcommittees. Independence The Board reviewed the background, experience and independence of the Compensation Committee members and, based on this review, the Board determined that each member of the Compensation Committee: • meets the independence requirements of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards; • is an “outside director” pursuant to the criteria established by the Internal Revenue Service; and • is a“non-employee” director within the meaning of Rule16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 21

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Role of Compensation Consultant.The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain compensation consultants or advisors to assist it in evaluating CEO, senior executive andnon-employee director compensation. From time to time, management also retains its own outside compensation consultants. In 2016, the Committee directly engaged FW Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) as its independent compensation consultant. FW Cook’s work with the Committee included analyses, advice, guidance and recommendations on executive compensation levels versus peers, market trends and incentive plan designs. In addition, FW Cook provided the Committee with advice and recommendations regarding compensation provided toMs. Suarez-Gonzalez in connection with her hiring as well as compensation provided to Mr. Richard O’Leary in connection with his promotion to CFO. In November 2016, FW Cook provided the Committee with advice and a review of director compensation. FW Cook will continue to work with the Committee to provide it with analyses, advice, guidance and recommendations on executive compensation levels versus peers, market trends and incentive plan designs. FW Cook was engaged exclusively by the Committee on executive and director compensation matters and does not have any other consulting arrangements with the Company. The Compensation Committee considered the independence of FW Cook and determined that no conflicts of interest exist.

Role of Management.Our Compensation Committee relies on management for legal, tax, compliance, finance and human resource recommendations, and data and analysis for the design and administration of the compensation, benefits and perquisite programs for our senior executives. The Compensation Committee combines this information with the recommendations and information from its independent compensation consultant.

Our CEO, our Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer (“CHRO”) and our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary (“General Counsel”) generally attend Compensation Committee meetings. CEO performance and compensation are discussed by the Compensation Committee in executive session, with advice and participation from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant as requested by the Compensation Committee. Our CEO and CHRO, without the presence of any other members of senior management, actively participate in the compensation discussions of our senior executives, including making recommendations to the Compensation Committee as to the amount and form of compensation (other than their own).

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.None of the members of the Compensation Committee was at any time during 2016 or at any other time an officer or employee of our Company. None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee.

22IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Nominating and Governance Committee


Current Members:		Responsibilities

Linda Buck Christina Gold (Chair) Henry W. Howell, Jr. Dale F. Morrison Meetings in 2016: 5		The Nominating and Governance Committee’s responsibilities include: • developing and reviewing criteria for the selection of directors, and making recommendations to the Board with respect thereto; • identifying qualified individuals to serve on the Board, reviewing the qualifications of director candidates and recommending to the Board the nominees to be proposed by the Board for election as directors at the annual meeting of shareholders; • reviewing the suitability of directors for continued service, including in case of a resignation tendered by a director following a change in employment or anticipated board memberships, and making recommendations to the Board with respect to their continued service; • reviewing director candidates recommended by shareholders for election; • establishing and reviewing policies pertaining to roles, responsibilities, tenure and removal of directors; • overseeing CEO succession plans; • developing and reviewing the Board and Board committee evaluation process; • overseeing the annual CEO evaluation process; • reviewing and recommending changes to our Corporate Governance Guidelines and monitoring corporate governance issues; and • reviewing and, if appropriate, approving transactions with related parties. *Delegation*.The Nominating and Governance Committee may, when it deems appropriate, delegate certain of its responsibilities to one or more Nominating and Governance Committee members or subcommittees. Independence The Board reviewed the background, experience and independence of the Nominating and Governance Committee members, and based on this review, the Board determined that each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee meets the independence requirements of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 23

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board and Committee Assessment Process

Each year, the Nominating & Governance Committee leads an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board and each of its Committees. Each member of the Board and each member of the Board committees responds to an anonymous survey regarding the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and their leadership, and the dynamics between the Board and management. In 2016, the Board supplemented this process through the use ofin-person director interviews. The Lead Director and the Chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee interviewed each director to obtain his or her assessment of director performance, Board dynamics and the effectiveness of the Board and its committees. After consulting with each other, the Lead Director and Chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee summarized and reviewed the results with the Board and each Board committee.

Succession Planning

Our Board recognizes that one of its most important duties is to ensure excellence and continuity in our senior leadership by overseeing the development of executive talent and planning for the effective succession of our Chairman and CEO and other senior members of executive management. As part of this process, our CEO and members of our Executive Committee are required to prepare a detailed development and succession plan for themselves and for their direct reports on an annual basis. The Board engages in detailed discussions with the CEO and CHRO regarding these plans, with a focus on key positions at the senior officer level, as well as the talent pipeline for specific critical roles. The Company’s executives regularly attend Board meetings and maintain an ongoing dialogue with Board members, which is critical to the Company’s succession planning. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee members, and based on this review, the Board determined that each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee meets the independence requirements of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards.

~~Director Candidates~~

Our Nominating and Governance Committee has established a policy regarding the consideration of director candidates. The Nominating and Governance Committee, together with other Board members, from time to time, as appropriate, identifies the need for new Board members. Proposed director candidates who satisfy the criteria described below and who otherwise qualify for membership on the Board are identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee. In identifying candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee seeks input and participation from other Board members and other appropriate sources so that all points of view are considered and the best possible candidates identified. The Nominating and Governance Committee may also engage a search firm to assist it in identifying potential candidates. Members of the Nominating and Governance Committee and other Board members, as appropriate, interview selected director candidates, evaluate the director candidates and determine which candidates are to be recommended by the Nominating and Governance Committee to the Board. Our Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates the suitability of potential candidates nominated by shareholders in the same manner as other candidates recommended to the Nominating and Governance Committee.

~~Table of Contents~~

In addition, in December 2015, our Board adopted a “proxy access” by-law, which permits eligible shareholders to nominate candidates for election to our Board. Proxy access candidates will be included in the Company’s proxy statement and ballot. The proxy access bylaw provides that holders:

~~of at least 3% of the Company’s outstanding shares, which can comprise up to 20 shareholders,~~

~~holding the shares continuously for at least 3 years,~~

~~can nominate individuals constituting up to 20% of the Board for election at an annual shareholders meeting.~~

Board candidates are considered based on various criteria which may change over time and as the composition of the Board changes. At a minimum, our Nominating and Governance Committee considers the following factors as part of its review of all director candidates and in recommending potential director candidates:

~~judgment, character, expertise, skills and knowledge useful to the oversight of our business;~~

~~diversity of viewpoints, backgrounds, experiences and other demographics;~~

~~business or other relevant experience; and~~

the extent to which the interplay of the candidate’s expertise, skills, knowledge and experience with that of other Board members will build a Board that is effective, collegial and responsive to our needs and to the requirements and standards of the NYSE and the SEC.

Under our By-Laws, if a shareholder wishes to submit a director candidate for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee, or wishes a director nomination to be included in the Company’s proxy statement for an annual meeting pursuant to our proxy access by-law, the shareholder must deliver or mail notice of the request to the Corporate Secretary of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., in writing, so that it is received not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the prior year’s annual meeting of shareholders. However if the annual meeting is not within 30 days of the anniversary date of the prior year’s annual meeting, such notice must be received by the Corporate Secretary no later than 10 days following the mailing of notice of the annual meeting or public disclosure of the annual meeting date, whichever occurs first. The notice must be accompanied by the information concerning the director candidate and nominating shareholder described in Article I, Section 3 and Section 4 of our By-Laws. The Nominating and Governance Committee may also request any additional background or other information from any director candidate or recommending shareholder as it may deem appropriate.

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that we have at least six but not more than fifteen directors. To ensure independence and to provide the breadth of needed expertise and diversity of our Board, the Board periodically reviews its size and makes appropriate adjustments pursuant to our By-Laws. While the Nominating and Governance Committee has not adopted a formal diversity policy with regard to the selection of director nominees, diversity is one of the factors that the Nominating and Governance Committee considers in identifying director nominees. As part of this process, the Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates how a particular candidate would strengthen and increase the diversity of the Board in terms of how that candidate may contribute to the Board’s overall balance of perspectives, backgrounds, knowledge, experience, skill sets and expertise in substantive matters pertaining to our business. The Nominating and Governance Committee also annually reviews each current Board member’s suitability for continued service as a member of our Boardagrees upon and recommends to the Board ~~whether such member should be re-nominated. In addition, each director~~a succession plan for our CEO, including in emergency situations. Our Board is ~~required~~committed to ~~promptly tender his~~being prepared for a planned or ~~her resignation to the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee if, during his or her tenure as a director, such director (i) has a material~~unplanned change in ~~employment, or (ii) a significant change~~our leadership in ~~personal circumstances, which may adversely affect his or her reputation, or the reputation of the Company, or (iii) intends~~order to join the board of another for-profit company, so that the Nominating and Governance Committee can review the change and make a recommendation to the full Board regarding the director’s continued service. Such resignation becomes effective only upon acceptance by the Board.

ensure our stability.

~~Table of Contents~~

Risk Management Oversight

Board Role in Overseeing Risk

Our Board is actively involved in the oversight of risks that could affect our ~~Company. This oversight is conducted primarily through the Audit~~Company and ~~Compensation Committees of the Board, but the full Board has retained responsibility for the general oversight of risks. The Board~~ is responsible for overseeing and reviewing with management the Company’s enterprise-wide risks and the policies and practices established to manage such risks. It is the responsibility of the CEO and other senior management to manage the Company’sday-to-day business risks and its risk management process. We believe this division of responsibility is the most effective approach for addressing risk management.

Management maintains an enterprise risk management (“ERM”) ~~process~~program which is designed to identify and assess our global risks and to develop steps to mitigate and manage risks. The Board receives regular reports on the ERM process. The full Board and the Audit Committee focus on ~~the most significant risks facing us, including~~ operational risk, financial risk, regulatory risk, litigation risk, cybersecurity and information security risk, tax risk, credit risk, and liquidity risk, as well as our general risk management strategy, and how these risks are being managed. The Audit Committee is primarily responsible for assisting the Board in its responsibility to oversee and review with management our enterprise-wide risks and the policies and practices established to manage such risks, in particular as they relate to financial ~~risk, cybersecurity and information security~~ risk. The Compensation Committee is primarily responsible for overseeing the management of risks associated with compensation policies and practice, our compensation plans (including equity compensation plans and programs), severance, change in control and other employment-related matters.

Compensation Risks

In the fourth quarter of ~~2015,~~2016, the Compensation Committee, working with its independent compensation consultant, conducted a risk assessment of our executive compensation programs. The goal of this assessment was to determine whether the general structure of our executive compensation policies and

24IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

programs, annual and long-term performance goals or the administration of the programs posed any material risks to our Company. In addition, with the input of our CHRO, the Compensation Committee reviewed compensation programs and policies below the executive level in a Company-wide risk assessment. The Compensation Committee shared the results of this review with our full Board.

The Compensation Committee determined, based on the reviews of its independent compensation consultant and management’s input and other factors, that the compensation policies and practices for the Company’s employees in ~~2015,~~2016, including the established performance goals and incentive plan structures, did not result in excessive risk taking or the implementation of inappropriate business decisions or strategies by the Company’s senior executives or employees generally, and that there are no risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

~~Table of Contents~~

Related Person Transactions

and Other Information

Transactions with Related Persons

In ~~2015,~~2016, there were no transactions and there are no currently proposed transactions in excess of $120,000 in which the Company was or will be a participant and in which any director or executive officer of the Company, any known 5% or greater shareholder of the Company or any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest as defined in Item 404(a) of RegulationS-K.

Related Person Transactions Policy

In accordance with SEC rules, our Board has adopted a written policy for the review and the approval ~~or ratification~~ of related person transactions. This policy is available through the ~~Investor-Leadership & Governance-Governance~~Investor-Corporate Governance link on our website, ~~www.iff.com~~.www.iff.com. Under the policy, a “related person” is specifically defined as an executive officer, a director, a director nominee, a beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of voting securities, an immediate family member of any of the foregoing, or a controlled entity, which is defined as an entity owned or controlled by any of the foregoing or in which any such person serves as an officer or partner, or together with all of the foregoing persons, owns 5% or more equity interests. The policy defines a “related person transaction” as a transaction or series of transactions involving a related person and the Company, excluding employment arrangements involving an executive officer or other senior officer or employee of the Company and director compensation arrangements. The policy requires that any such transaction be approved or ratified by the Nominating and Governance Committee. If accounting issues are involved in the transaction, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consult with the Audit Committee if deemed appropriate.

Pursuant to the policy, a related person transaction will be approved or ratified only if the Nominating and Governance Committee determines that it is being entered into in good faith and on fair and reasonable terms which are in the best interest of our Company and our shareholders. In determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the following factors, to the extent relevant:

the related person’s relationship to the Company and interest in the transaction;

the material facts of the transaction;

the benefits to the Company;

the availability of alternate sources of comparable products or services and the terms of such alternative; and

an assessment as to whether the transaction is on terms comparable to the terms available to an unrelated third party or to employees generally.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 25

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

No related person may participate in the review of a transaction in which he or she may have an interest. In addition, except fornon-discretionary contributions made pursuant to our matching contributions program, a charitable contribution by our Company to an organization in which a related person is known to be an officer, director or trustee, is subject to approval by the Nominating and Governance Committee.

~~Code~~

Other Information

On August 5, 2008, the SEC approved a settlement with Ernst & Young LLP and two of ~~Business Conduct~~its partners, including Mr. Ferraro, relating to auditor independence issues arising out of business relationships between Ernst & Young LLP and ~~Ethics~~

~~We have adopted~~an individual who was also a ~~Code~~member of ~~Business Conduct~~the board of directors of three of its audit clients. The matter arose out of actions taken by Mr. Ferraro in 2002 in his role as Vice Chairman of Ernst & Young LLP. Ernst & Young LLP and ~~Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”)~~Mr. Ferraro resolved that applies to all of our employees, including our CEO, our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and our Chief Accounting Officer (“CAO”). We also have adopted a Code of Conduct for Directors and a Code of Conduct for Executive Officers (together with the Code of Ethics, the “Codes”). The Codes are available through the Investor - Leadership & Governance - Governance link on our website, ~~www.iff.com~~.

~~Only the Board or the Audit Committee may grant a waiver from any provision of our Codes in favor~~matter by way of a ~~director~~negotiated settlement in which the respondents neither admitted nor denied the underlying allegations and accepted an administrative cease and desist order. The negotiated resolution did not involve any suspension, fines or ~~executive officer,~~other sanctions against Mr. Ferraro. Mr. Ferraro thereafter remained a partner in good standing at Ernst & Young LLP through January 2015. Our Board took into consideration all factors regarding Mr. Ferraro’s character and ~~any such waiver~~experience and ~~any amendments~~believes that he is a significant asset to the ~~Codes will be publicly disclosed on our website,~~ Board.

~~www.iff.com~~.

~~Table of Contents~~

Share Retention Policy

We encourage our executives and directors to own our common stock so that they share the same long-term investment risk as our shareholders.

Our Share Retention Policy provides executives and directors flexibility in personal financial planning, yet requires them to maintain ongoing and substantial investment in our common stock.

Under our Share Retention Policy, each executive and director must retain shares of Company common stock ~~based on~~at a targeted ownership level. There is no deadline by which an executive or director must meet his or her targeted ownership level. The targeted ownership level for directors is five times the cash portion of the annual retainer (not including any retainer for service as a committee chairperson or lead director). The targeted ownership levels for executives ~~are (1)~~ are:

the lesser of shares equal in value to five times base salary or 120,000 shares for our CEO, ~~(2)~~

the lesser of shares equal in value to three times base salary or 35,000 shares for our CFO and Group Presidents, and ~~(3)~~

the lesser of shares equal in value to two times base salary or 20,000 shares for our General ~~Counsel and Mr. O'Leary.~~Counsel.

If an executive or director does not meet the targeted ownership level, the executive or director may not sell or transfer any shares held in an equity, deferred compensation or retirement plan account managed by us, and the executive or director must retain such shares in such accounts until the targeted ownership level is met. For executives, until the retention requirement is met, the executive must also retain a portion (50%, in the case of our named executive officers) of any shares of common stock acquired from the exercise of a stock ~~option or stock~~ settled appreciation right (“SSAR”) or the vesting of restricted stock or a restricted stock unit (“RSU”) (after payment of any exercise price and taxes).

~~Our Share Retention Policy provides executives and directors flexibility in personal financial planning, yet requires them to maintain ongoing and substantial investment in our common stock.~~

As of March 8, ~~2016,~~2017, all of our named executive officers and directors were in compliance with their individual retention requirements. Additional detail regarding ownership of our common stock by our executives and directors is included in this proxy statement under the heading “Securities Ownership of Management, Directors and Certain Other Persons.”

26IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Equity Grant Policy

The Compensation Committee has adopted an equity grant policy with respect to the issuance of equity awards under our equity plans. Under the equity grant policy, the Compensation Committee approves all equity awards to our executives except awards to our CEO and to ournon-employee directors, which are approved by our Board. The grant date for annual awards to all employees and for annual awards to ournon-employee directors is the date of the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders. The grant date for ~~LTIP~~awards under our Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) is the date that the Compensation Committee (or Board in the case of our CEO) approves the applicable LTIP metrics. In addition to the annual grants, equity awards may be granted ~~“off-cycle”~~“off-cycle” at other times during the year to new hires, employees receiving promotions, director appointments and in other special circumstances. The grant price of equity awards (other than LTIP awards) ~~will be~~is the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of the grant or, if the grant date is not a business day, the closing price on the NYSE on the following business day. The grant price for LTIP awards ~~will be~~is the20-day trailing average price of our common stock on the NYSE as of the first trading day of the applicable LTIP performance cycle.

Policy Regarding Derivatives, Short Sales, Hedging and Pledges

Under our insider trading policy, directors and all employees, including our executive officers ~~including our~~and named executive officers, are prohibited from entering into transactions designed to hedge against economic risks associated with an investment in our common stock. These individuals may not trade in derivatives in our securities (such as put and call options), effect “short sales” of our common stock, or enter into monetization transactions or similar arrangements (such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars or exchange funds) relating to our securities. These individuals are also prohibited from holding shares of our common stock in margin accounts or pledging shares of our common stock as collateral for a loan.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 27

~~Table of Contents~~

~~IV. DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION~~

Director Compensation Program

Annual Director Cash and Equity Compensation

~~In 2015,~~

Under ournon-employee director compensation program, for the service year from the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2016 Annual Meeting”) to the 2017 Annual Meeting, eachnon-employee director received an annual retainer of $225,000, ~~(or a prorated portion for a partial year~~ of ~~service) relating to the service year from the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2015 Annual Meeting”) to the 2016 Annual Meeting. Of this amount,~~which $112,500 was paid in cash in November ~~2015,~~2016 and $112,500 was paid in RSUs issued under our 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (“2015 SAIP”) on the date of the ~~2015~~2016 Annual Meeting. These RSUs vest ~~at least~~ one year from the grant date and are subject to accelerated vesting upon a change in control. The ~~952~~938 RSUs granted to each director on the date of the ~~2015~~2016 Annual Meeting was calculated using the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date. Any director who is an employee of our Company does not receive any additional compensation for his or her service as a director.

~~Annual Committee Chair and~~

Compensation for our Lead Director ~~Compensation~~

~~During 2015,~~and Committee Chairs

For the service year from the 2016 Annual Meeting to the 2017 Annual Meeting, the Lead Director received an additional annual cash retainer of $20,000, the Chair of each of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee received an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 and the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee received an additional annual cash retainer of $10,000.

Participation in our Deferred Compensation Plan

Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in our Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”). Anon- employee director may defer all or a portion of his or her cash compensation as well as any RSUs granted to him or her, subject to tax law requirements. Additional details regarding our DCP may be found in this proxy statement under the heading “Executive ~~Compensation -~~ Compensation—Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation.”Non-employee directors are not entitled to matching contributions or the 25% premium on deferrals into our common stock fund that are applicable to employees under the DCP.

~~Other~~

Additional Benefits

We reimburse ournon-employee directors for travel and lodging expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at Board and Committee meetings, our shareholder meetings and other Company-related activities.

In addition, our current directors are eligible to participate in our Matching Gift Program. Under this program, we match, on a dollar for dollar basis, contributions made by directors to qualifying charitable organizations up to a maximum of $10,000 per person per year.

Changes for 2017

In November 2016, our Board approved changes to ournon-employee director compensation program for the service year beginning with the 2017 Annual Meeting. Beginning in 2017, the annual retainer paid to ournon-employee directors will be increased to $235,000, of which $112,500 will be paid in cash and $122,500 will be paid in RSUs. In addition, the annual retainer for each of the Chair of the Audit Committee and Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee will be increased to $17,500 and $12,500, respectively.

Directors’ Compensation

28IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION

The following table details the compensation paid to or earned by ournon-employee directors for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~

~~2015~~2016.

2016 Directors’ Compensation

Name (1)
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash($)(2)

Stock
Awards
($)(3)(4)(5)

All Other
Compensation
($)(6)
Total ($)
Marcello V. Bottoli 112,569 107,081 5,000 224,650
Dr. Linda Buck 112,500 107,081 — 219,581
J. Michael Cook (7) — — 10,000 10,000
Michael L. Ducker 112,500 107,081 10,000 229,581
Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. 127,500 107,081 — 234,581
John F. Ferraro 112,500 107,081 10,000 229,581
Christina Gold 112,569 107,081 10,000 229,650
Alexandra A. Herzan (7) — — 10,000 10,000
Henry W. Howell, Jr. 122,500 107,081 10,000 239,581
Katherine M. Hudson 127,500 107,081 10,000 244,581
Arthur C. Martinez (7) — — 10,000 10,000
Dale F. Morrison 132,500 107,081 10,000 249,581

~~Table of Contents~~


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash($)(1)	Stock Awards ($)(2)(3)(4)		All Other Compensation ($)(5)		Total ($)
Marcello V. Bottoli	112,618		110,290		5,000		227,908
Dr. Linda Buck	112,500		110,290		—		222,790
Michael L. Ducker	112,500		110,290		—		222,790
David R. Epstein	112,500		147,367		5,000		264,867
Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.	127,500		110,290		—		237,790
John F. Ferraro	127,500		110,290		10,000		247,790
Christina Gold	112,618		110,290		10,000		232,908
Henry W. Howell, Jr.	122,500		110,290		10,000		242,790
Katherine M. Hudson	112,500		110,290		8,000		230,790
Dale F. Morrison	132,500		110,290		10,000		252,790


(1)	~~Mr. Epstein joined our Board in 2016 and is not included in the table above, as he received no director compensation for 2015.~~

~~(2)~~

The amounts in this column include (i) the annual cash retainer for service as anon-employee director, (ii) for certain directors, the annual cash retainer for service as Lead Director or as chairperson of a Board committee during ~~2015,~~2016, and (iii) nominal amounts of cash paid in lieu of fractional shares of common stock. Of the amounts in this column, the following amounts were deferred in ~~2015~~2016 under our DCP: Dr. Buck - $112,500; Mr. Ducker - $112,500; Mr. Epstein - $112,500; Mr. Ferguson - $127,500; Mr. Ferraro - ~~$112,500;~~$127,500; Mr. Howell - $122,500; Ms. Hudson - ~~$127,500;~~$112,500; and Mr. Morrison - $132,500. Earnings in our DCP were not above-market or preferential and thus are not reported in this table.

~~(3)~~(2)

The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Details on and assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of RSUs ~~and options~~ may be found in Note 12 to our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 included in our Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the SEC on ~~March 1, 2016.~~February 28, 2017.

~~(4)~~(3)

Each director received a grant on May ~~6, 2015~~2, 2016 of ~~952~~938 RSUs under our 2015 ~~SAIP, other than Messrs. Cook and Martinez and Ms. Herzan,~~SAIP. Mr. Epstein, who ~~retired prior to last year's~~joined our Board during 2016, received an additional grant of 319 RSUs on February 1, 2016, which represents his prorated annual ~~meeting.~~share retainer. None of our directors forfeited any RSUs or shares of deferred stock during ~~2015.~~2016.


~~(5)~~(4)	As of December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the following directors held the ~~following~~ number of unvested RSUs and shares of deferred common ~~stock.~~stock indicated.

Director RSUs
Deferred
Stock

Marcello V. Bottoli 2,247
12,959

Dr. Linda Buck 2,247
14,115

Michael L. Ducker 952
2,213

Roger L. Ferguson, Jr. 2,247
6,532

John Ferraro 952
—

Christina Gold 2,247
—

Henry W. Howell, Jr. 2,247
39,881

Katherine M. Hudson 2,247
14,743

Dale F. Morrison 2,247
9,097


Director	RSUs		Deferred Stock
Marcello V. Bottoli		938		15,469
Dr. Linda Buck		938		16,647
Michael L. Ducker		938		3,215
David R. Epstein		1,257		583
Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.		938		8,922
John F. Ferraro		938		961
Christina Gold		938		1,307
Henry W. Howell, Jr.		938		43,813
Katherine M. Hudson		938		17,287
Dale F. Morrison		938		12,526

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 29

DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION

The deferred shares, which are held under the DCP, result from deferral of vested equity grants, voluntary deferral of retainer fees or the crediting of additional share units as a result of reinvestment of dividend equivalents. Deferred shares will be settled by delivery of common stock upon the director’s separation from service on the Board, or as otherwise elected by the director. All of the deferred shares are included for each director in the Beneficial Ownership Table.


~~(6)~~(5)	The amounts in this column are contributions made by us under our Matching Gift Program to eligible charitable organizations matching contributions of the director to those charitable organizations during ~~2015.~~2016.


~~(7)~~	~~Each of Messrs. Cook and Martinez and Ms. Herzan retired from our Board in 2015 and therefore did not receive any cash retainer or equity compensation in 2015.~~

30IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

~~Table of Contents~~

~~V. SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT, DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN OTHER PERSONS~~
~~Beneficial Ownership Table~~
Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 8, ~~2016,~~2017, by each current director, each director nominee, the persons named in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement and all current directors and executive officers as a group. To our knowledge, except as otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership includes sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)
Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned(2)(3)

Percent of
Class**

Marcello V. Bottoli 17,451
(4) *
Dr. Linda Buck 16,362
(5) *
Anne Chwat 58,871
(6) *
Alison A. Cornell 3,103
(7) *
Michael L. Ducker 3,165
(8) *
David R. Epstein —
*
Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. 8,779
(9) *
John F. Ferraro 952
(10) *
Andreas Fibig 35,760
(11) *
Christina Gold 3,392
(12) *
Matthias Haeni 23,678
(13) *
Henry W. Howell, Jr. 42,128
(14) *
Katherine M. Hudson 19,490
(15) *
Nicolas Mirzayantz 78,144
(16) *
Dale F. Morrison 11,344
(17) *
Richard O’ Leary 19,900
(18) *
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (19 persons) 437,563
(19) *

~~_____________________~~


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)	Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (2)(3)			Percent of Class**
Marcello V. Bottoli		18,652	(4)	*
Dr. Linda Buck		17,585	(5)	*
Anne Chwat		57,458	(6)	*
Alison A. Cornell		6,270	(7)	*
Michael L. Ducker		4,153	(8)	*
David R. Epstein		1,840	(9)	*
Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.		9,860	(10)	*
John F. Ferraro		1,899	(11)	*
Andreas Fibig		53,771	(12)	*
Christina Gold		4,342	(13)	*
Matthias Haeni		23,356	(14)	*
Henry W. Howell, Jr.		43,976	(15)	*
Katherine M. Hudson		20,725	(16)	*
Nicolas Mirzayantz		59,102	(17)	*
Dale F. Morrison		13,464	(18)	*
Richard O’ Leary		20,557	(19)	*
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (18 persons)		382,468	(20)	*


*	Less than 1%.


**	Based on ~~79,685,747~~78,972,864 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 8, ~~2016.~~2017.


(1)	Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each person named in the table is c/o International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., 521 West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019.


(2)	This column includes (i) shares held by our executive officers in our 401(k) Retirement Investment Fund Plan and (ii) shares of Purchased Restricted Stock (“PRS”) held by our executive officers. Shares of PRS are subject to vesting and may be forfeited if the executive’s employment is terminated.

(3)

In determining the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by each person, shares that may be acquired by such person within 60 days after March 8, ~~2016~~2017 are deemed outstanding for purposes of determining the total number of outstanding shares for such person and are not deemed outstanding for such purpose for all other shareholders. Certain stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP are premium stock equivalent units paid to executives that are subject to vesting and may be forfeited if the executive’s employment is terminated. To our knowledge, except as otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership includes sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares.

(4)

Includes (i) ~~2,245~~1,100 shares held indirectly by a trust for which Mr. Bottoli is the settlor/grantor and Mr. Bottoli and two immediate family members are the beneficiaries, (ii) ~~12,959~~15,469 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (iii) ~~2,247~~938 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 8, ~~2016 that will be automatically deferred~~2017 which Mr. Bottoli has elected to defer to our DCP.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 31

Securities Ownership

SECURITIES OWNERSHIP


(5)	Represents (i) ~~14,115~~16,647 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) ~~2,247~~938 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 8, ~~2016 that will be automatically deferred~~2017 which Ms. Buck has elected to defer to our DCP.

~~Table of Contents~~


(6)	Includes (i) ~~7,549~~8,122 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) ~~3,006~~1,753 shares earned under the completed ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 LTIP cycle that ~~have not yet been issued.~~will be issued within 60 days after March 8, 2017.


(7)	Includes ~~495~~848 shares earned under the completed ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 LTIP cycle that ~~have not yet been issued.~~will be issued within 60 days after March 8, 2017.


(8)	Represents (i) ~~2,213~~3,215 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) ~~952~~938 shares pursuant to RSUs that will vest within 60 days after March 8, ~~2016 that will be automatically deferred~~2017 which Mr. Ducker has elected to defer to our DCP.


(9)	Represents (i) ~~6,532~~902 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) ~~2,247~~938 shares pursuant to RSUs that will vest within 60 days after March 8, 2017 which Mr. Epstein has elected to defer to our DCP.

(10)	Represents (i) 8,922 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 938 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 8, ~~2016 that will be automatically deferred~~2017 which Mr. Ferguson has elected to defer to our DCP.


~~(10)~~(11)	Represents ~~952~~(i) 961 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 938 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that will vest within 60 days after March 8, ~~2016 that will be automatically deferred~~2017 which Mr. Ferraro has elected to defer to our DCP.


~~(11)~~(12)	Includes (i) ~~4,602~~9,140 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP, (ii) ~~1,295~~7,967 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 8, ~~2016~~2017 and (iii) ~~6,114~~7,868 shares earned under the completed ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 LTIP cycle that ~~have not yet been issued.~~will be issued within 60 days after March 8, 2017.


~~(12)~~(13)	Includes ~~2,247~~(i) 1,307 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) 938 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that will vest within 60 days after March 8, ~~2016, of which 952~~2017.

(14)	Includes 3,145 shares earned under the completed 2014-2016 LTIP cycle that will be ~~automatically deferred to our DCP.~~


~~(13)~~	~~Includes (i) 1,922 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that will vest~~issued within 60 days after March 8, ~~2016 and (ii) 1,822 shares earned under the completed 2013-2015 LTIP cycle that have not yet been issued.~~2017.

(15)
~~(14)~~	~~Represents~~Includes (i) ~~39,881~~41,840 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) ~~2,247~~938 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 8, ~~2016 that will be automatically deferred~~2017 which Mr. Howell has elected to defer to our DCP.


~~(15)~~(16)	Includes (i) ~~14,743~~17,287 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) ~~2,247~~938 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 8, ~~2016 that will be automatically deferred~~2017 which Ms. Hudson has elected to defer to our DCP.


~~(16)~~(17)	Includes (i) ~~1,543~~1,831 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) ~~4,851~~3,145 shares earned under the completed ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 LTIP cycle that ~~have not yet been issued.~~will be issued within 60 days after March 8, 2017.

(18)
~~(17)~~	~~Represents~~Includes (i) ~~9,097~~12,526 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) ~~2,247~~938 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 8, ~~2016 that will be automatically deferred~~2017 which Mr. Morrison has elected to defer to our DCP.


~~(18)~~(19)	Includes (i) ~~1,144~~1,705 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP and (ii) ~~1,570~~944 shares earned under the completed ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 LTIP cycle that ~~have not yet been issued.~~will be issued within 60 days after March 8, 2017.

~~(19)~~(20)

Includes an aggregate of (i) ~~114,621~~139,874 stock equivalent units held in the IFF Stock Fund under our DCP, (ii) ~~21,821~~17,347 shares issuable pursuant to ~~restricted stock units~~RSUs that vest within 60 days after March 8, ~~2016,~~2017, and (iii) ~~24,197~~19,054 shares earned under the completed ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 LTIP cycle that ~~have not yet been issued.~~will be issued within 60 days after March 8, 2017.

32IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

SECURITIES OWNERSHIP

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Certain Other Owners~~

5% Shareholders

The following table sets forth information regarding each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, as of March 8, ~~2016,~~2017 unless otherwise indicated, based on a review of filings with the SEC. Unless otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership is direct.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Number of Shares and
Nature of Beneficial Ownership

Percent
of Class*

BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
4,655,216
(1) 5.8 %
Capital Research Global Investors
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071
6,225,302
(2) 7.8 %
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
7,467,990
(3) 9.4 %


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Number of Shares and Nature of Beneficial Ownership			Percent of Class*
Winder Investment Pte Ltd #03-00 8 Robinson Road, ASO Building Singapore 048544		8,345,653	(1)		10.6%
The Vanguard Group 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355		7,943,024	(2)		10.1%
Capital Research Global Investors 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071		5,988,445	(3)		7.6%
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055		4,850,104	(4)		6.1%


*	Based on ~~79,685,747~~78,972,864 shares of common stock ~~outstanding.~~outstanding as of March 8, 2017.


(1)	This amount is based solely on Amendment No. 62 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on ~~January 26, 2016~~March 10, 2017 and a Form 4 filed with the SEC on March 14, 2017 by ~~BlackRock, Inc.~~Winder Investment Pte Ltd. Winder Investment has the sole power to vote or direct the vote and the sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of these shares.

(2)

This amount is based solely on Amendment No. 8 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on March 10, 2017 by The Vanguard Group. Of these shares, ~~BlackRock~~The Vanguard Group has the (i) sole power to vote or direct the vote with respect to ~~3,969,533~~125,632 of these shares, ~~and~~(ii) shared power to vote or direct the vote with respect to 16,424 of these shares, (iii) sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of ~~4,655,216~~7,802,370 of these shares, and (iv) shared power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 140,654 of these shares.


~~(2)~~(3)	This amount is based solely on Amendment No. 34 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February ~~16, 2016~~13, 2017 by Capital Research Global Investors, a division of Capital Research and Management ~~Company (“Capital Research”).~~Company. Capital Research has the sole power to vote or direct the vote and the sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of these shares.

~~(3)~~(4)

This amount is based solely on Amendment No. 57 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on ~~February 10, 2016~~January 25, 2017 by ~~The Vanguard Group.~~BlackRock, Inc. Of these shares, ~~The Vanguard Group~~BlackRock has the ~~(i)~~ sole power to vote or direct the vote with respect to ~~149,808~~4,129,250 of these shares ~~(ii) shared power to vote or direct the vote with respect to 7,700 of these shares, (iii) the~~and sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of ~~7,308,518 of these shares, and (iv) shared power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 159,472~~4,850,104 of these shares.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 33

~~VI. PROPOSAL II — RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM~~

Selection of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee of our Board is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm. To execute this responsibility, the Audit Committee engages in a comprehensive annual evaluation of the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence to determine whether the independent registered public accounting firm should be rotated, and considers the advisability and potential impact of selecting a different independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for ~~2016,~~2017, and our Board has directed that our management submit that selection for ratification by our shareholders at the ~~2016~~2017 Annual Meeting. PwC has been retained as our external auditor continuously since 1957. In connection with the selection of PwC, the Audit Committee annually reviews and negotiates the terms of the engagement letter entered into with PwC. This letter sets forth important terms regarding the scope of the engagement, associated fees, payment terms, responsibilities of each party and the election of the parties to be subject to binding arbitration in the case of any dispute.

In accordance with SEC rules and PwC policies, audit partners are subject to rotation requirements to limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may provide audit service to our Company. For lead and quality review audit partners, the maximum number of consecutive years of service in that capacity is five years. The process for selection of our lead audit partner pursuant to this rotation policy involves a meeting between the Chair of the Audit Committee and the candidate for the role, as well as discussion by the full Audit Committee and management.

~~Table of Contents~~

The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interest of the Company and our shareholders, and we are asking our shareholders to ratify the selection of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for ~~2016.~~2017. Although ratification is not required by ourBy-Laws or otherwise, we are submitting the selection of PwC to our shareholders for ratification because we value our ~~shareholders'~~shareholders’ views on our ~~Company's~~Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and as a matter of good corporate governance. The Audit Committee will consider the outcome of our shareholders’ vote in connection with the Audit Committee’s selection of our independent registered public accounting firm in the next fiscal year, but is not bound by the shareholders’ vote. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if it determines that a change would be in the best interests of our Company and our shareholders.

Representatives of PwC are expected to attend the ~~2016~~2017 Annual Meeting, where they will be available to respond to questions and, if they desire, to make a statement.

~~Our Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification~~

Proposal 2 — Ratification of ~~the Audit Committee’s selection of PwC as our~~ Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm ~~for 2016.~~

34IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table provides detail about fees for professional services rendered by PwC for the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014.~~

2015 2014
Audit Fees (1) $ 4,674,019
$ 4,733,219
Audit-Related Fees (2) $ 60,006
$ 610,004
Tax Fees (3)
Tax Compliance $ 554,447
$ 1,148,853
Other Tax Services $ 90,786
$ 82,127
All Other Fees (4) $ 67,849
$ 63,799
Total $ 5,447,107
$ 6,638,002

~~________________________~~

2015.


	2016		2015
Audit Fees (1)	$	5,269,019	$	4,674,019
Audit-Related Fees (2)	$	133,035	$	60,006
Tax Fees (3)
Tax Compliance	$	12,000	$	554,447
Other Tax Services	$	500,000	$	90,786
All Other Fees (4)	$	11,781	$	67,849
Total	$	5,925,835	$	5,447,107

(1)

Audit Fees were for professional services rendered for audits of our consolidated financial statements and statutory and subsidiary audits, consents and review of reports filed with the SEC and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards. Audit Fees also included the fees associated with an annual audit of our internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, integrated with the audit of our annual financial statements.


(2)	Audit-Related Fees were for ~~due diligence.~~services related to review of certain governance, risk and compliance procedures and other local statutory requirements.


(3)	Tax Compliance services consisted of fees related to the preparation of tax returns, assistance with tax audits and appeals, indirect taxes, expatriate tax compliance services and transfer pricing services. Other Tax Services consisted of tax planning and tax advisory services.


(4)	All Other Fees were for software licenses and other professional services.

~~Table of Contents~~

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures for Audit and PermittedNon-Audit Services

Consistent with requirements of the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee has responsibility ~~for (i)~~ for:

appointing, ~~(ii)~~

negotiating, and setting the compensation of, and ~~(iii)~~

overseeing the performance of, the independent registered public accounting firm.

In recognition of this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established policies and procedures topre-approve all audit andnon-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm to our Company by category, including audit-related services, tax services and other permittednon-audit services. Under the policy, the Audit Committeepre-approves all services obtained from our independent registered public accounting firm by category of service, including a review of specific services to be performed, fees expected to be incurred within each category of service and the potential impact of such services on auditor independence. The term of anypre-approval is for the financial year, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides for a different period in thepre-approval. If it becomes necessary to engage the independent registered public accounting firm for additional

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 35

PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

services not contemplated in the originalpre-approval, the Audit Committee requires separate ~~pre- approval~~pre-approval before engaging the independent registered public accounting firm. To facilitate the process, the policy delegatespre-approval authority to the Audit Committee chairperson topre-approve services up to $20,000, and the Audit Committee may also delegate authority to one or more of its members topre-approve services. The Audit Committee member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes, ~~only,~~ anypre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

All services rendered by PwC to our Company are permissible under applicable laws and regulations. During ~~2015,~~2016, all services performed by PwC which were subject to the SEC’spre-approval requirements were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the Audit Committee’spre-approval policy in effect during ~~2015.~~

2016.

~~AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT~~

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee (“we,” “us” or the “Committee”) operates in accordance with a written charter, which was adopted by the ~~Board of Directors.~~Board. A copy of that charter is available through the ~~Investor -~~ Investor—Leadership & ~~Governance -~~ Governance—Governance link on the Company’s website at www.iff.com. The Committee comprises five directors whom the Board has determined are “independent,” as required by the applicable listing standards of the NYSE and the rules of the SEC, and ~~each of~~ whom qualify as an “audit committee financial ~~expert”~~experts” as defined by the rules of the SEC.

Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), is responsible for performing an integrated audit of the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”).

The Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process and internal control structure on behalf of the ~~Board of Directors.~~Board. We met ~~seven~~eight times during ~~2015,~~2016, including meeting regularly with PwC and the Company’s internal auditor, both privately and with management present. For ~~2015,~~2016, we have reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with management. We have reviewed and discussed with management its process for preparing its report on its assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and at regular intervals we received updates on the status of this process and actions taken by management to respond to issues and deficiencies identified. We discussed with PwC its audit of the financial statements and of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. We discussed with PwC and the Company’s internal auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits.

We have discussed with PwC the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. ~~16,~~1301, Communications with Audit Committees. We also received the written disclosures and the letter from PwC as required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with PwC its independence. We concluded that PwC’s independence was not adversely affected by thenon-audit services provided by PwC, the majority of which consisted of audit-related and tax compliance services.

~~Table of Contents~~

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the Board (and the Board subsequently approved our recommendation) that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for filing with the SEC.

36IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

In determining whether to retain PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the ~~2016~~2017 fiscal year, we took into consideration a number of factors, including:

the quality and effectiveness of PwC’s historical and recent performance on the Company’s audit;

the length of PwC’s tenure as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and its familiarity with our business, accounting policies and practices, and internal control over financial reporting;

PwC’s capability, understanding and expertise in handling the breadth and complexity of our global operations;

the appropriateness of PwC’s fees and payment terms; and

PwC’s independence.

Based on this evaluation, we believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to retain PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for ~~2016,~~2017, which the shareholders will be asked to ratify at the ~~2016~~2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Audit Committee

John F. Ferraro (Chair)

Marcello V. Bottoli

David R. Epstein

Henry W. Howell, Jr.

Dale F. Morrison



	~~Audit Committee~~

	~~Katherine M. Hudson (Chair)~~

	~~David R. Epstein~~ ~~John Ferraro~~ ~~Henry W. Howell, Jr.~~ ~~Dale F. Morrison~~ Ö *YOUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”* *RATIFICATION OF PWC AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED* *PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2017*

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 37

~~Table of Contents~~

~~VII. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS~~

~~Executive Summary~~

Reference Guide to our CD&A

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis, ~~is designed to provide~~or CD&A, describes and analyzes our ~~shareholders with a clear understanding of our~~executive compensation philosophy and ~~objectives, compensation-setting process and~~program in the ~~2015~~context of the compensation paid during the last fiscal year to our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer, each of our ~~named~~three most highly compensated executive officers ~~or NEOs.~~ during 2016, and our former chief financial officer (collectively referred to as our NEOs). This CD&A is organized as follows:


Section		Page
Executive Summary		38
Compensation Philosophy		39
Compensation Governance		42
Compensation Elements and Targeted Mix		43
2016 Compensation		44
Salaries		44
Annual Incentive Plan		44
Long-Term Incentive Plan		49
Equity Choice Program		53


Section		Page
Indirect Compensation		55
Deferred Compensation Plan		55
Executive Severance Policy		56
Additional Benefits		56

Compensation Setting Process		58
Peer Group and Benchmarking		59
Clawback Policy		62
Tax Deductibility		62
2017 Compensation Actions		62
Non-GAAP Reconciliation		62

As discussed in Proposal ~~III,~~3, we are conducting our annual Say on Pay vote that requests your approval of the compensation of our NEOs as described in this section and in the tables and accompanying narrative contained below under “Executive Compensation.” To assist you with this vote, please review our compensation philosophies, the design of our executive compensation programs and how, we believe, these programs have contributed to and are aligned with our performance.

Executive Summary

Named Executive Officers

For ~~2015~~2016 our NEOs were:



Name		Title
Andreas Fibig		Chairman and CEO
	~~Alison A. Cornell~~ Richard O’Leary		CFO
	Nicolas Mirzayantz		Group President, Fragrances
	Matthias Haeni		Group President, Flavors
	Anne Chwat		General Counsel
	~~Richard O’Leary~~ Alison A. Cornell		Former ~~Interim~~ CFO

~~Alison A.~~

Executive Officer Transition

In October 2016, Ms. Cornell, our former CFO, left us to pursue other opportunities and Mr. O’Leary was appointed ~~as our CFO, effective July 8, 2015, replacing Richard~~EVP and CFO. Prior to his appointment, Mr. O’Leary ~~who~~ served as our ~~interim CFO from December 2014 through July 2015. Upon the appointment of Ms. Cornell, Mr. O’Leary was named~~ SVP, Controller and Chief Accounting ~~Officer.~~

Officer from July 2015 to October 2016. Ms. Cornell served as our CFO from July 2015 to October 2016. In connection with Mr. O’Leary’s appointment as EVP and CFO, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) approved a new compensation package for Mr. O’Leary, which is discussed below under “Employment Agreements or Arrangements”. In connection with her separation, Ms. Cornell entered into a separation agreement with us. For more information regarding Ms. Cornell’s separation agreement please see the section entitled Payments and Benefits Upon a Change in Control and Various Types of Terminations.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

38IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Compensation Philosophy

The core of our executive compensation philosophy is that our executives’ ~~pay~~compensation should be linked to achievement of financial and operating performance metrics that build shareholder ~~value. Consequently,~~value over both the short- and long-term. As such, we consistently focus on the following key drivers of shareholder value maximization:

LOGO

We designed our compensation program to ~~motivate and reward~~focus on elements that we believe will contribute to these shareholder value drivers. Our compensation program:

LOGO

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 39

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The design of our ~~executives for the achievement of both annual and long-term business goals~~executive compensation program reflects our belief that ~~are challenging yet attainable. A significant portion of compensation is variable and tied directly to Company and individual performance. We believe that~~our executive compensation should ~~(i)~~ be tied to overall Company performance, (ii) reflect each executive’s level of responsibility, (iii) reflect individual performance and contributions and (iv) include a significant equity component. We believe that by keeping the majority of executive pay variable and equity-based we can best ensure alignment(1) aligned with ~~shareholder value and Company growth.~~

~~Our Executive Compensation Program Rewards Executives for Achievements that Create Shareholder Value.~~ ~~During 2015, we continued to compensate our executive officers based on (i)~~ the achievement of financial and operational metrics offor both ~~the~~our company and the respective ~~segment~~business function in which the executive serves ~~which we believe creates shareholder value~~ and ~~(ii)~~(2) tied to the total shareholder return delivered to our shareholders. ~~In addition, for 2015, we added an individual performance metric for a portion of~~The following illustrates how our Annual Incentive Program (“AIP”) to measure our executive officers’ achievement in the areas of leadership, succession planning and people development as we believe that the strength of our employees will be key to our ability to build differentiation and accelerate growth.

~~Compensation is Variable and Tied to Our Performance~~. Our target total direct compensation for 2015 reflects our commitment that a significant portion of our executive compensation should be variable and tied directly to achievement of our financial, operational and shareholder return objectives. During 2015, as in prior years, our executive officers’ direct compensation elements primarily consisted of (1) base salary, (2) AIP awards, (3) Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) awards and (4) Equity Choice Program (“ECP”) awards. For 2015, 76% on average of the target total direct compensation payable to Messrs. Fibig, Haeni and Mirzayantz and Mmes. Cornell and Chwat was variable, and the value of such variable compensation was tied directly to stock price performance or performance versus pre-defined annual and long-term performance metrics, with 71% of this performance-based compensation tied to long-term performance.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~______~~


~~(1)~~	Compensation for Mr. O’Leary is not included in the amounts reflected due to his status as interim CFO and the distinct nature of his compensation. Compensation for Ms. Cornell is included on an annualized basis.

~~Compensation Aligns Executives with Our Shareholders.~~ ~~We have designed our~~2016 executive compensation program to provide a significant portion of our executives’ total direct compensation in the form of equity and to encourage both their direct investment in the Company and long-term ownership. For 2015, approximately 56% of the variable target compensation payable to Messrs. Fibig, Haeni and Mirzayantz and Mmes. Cornell and Chwat was payable in equity. The proportion of long-term incentive compensation opportunity provided in the form of equity versus cash under our LTIP and ECP for (i) Mr. Fibig and (ii) Messrs. Haeni and Mirzayantz and Mmes. Cornell and Chwat, on average, for 2015, was as follows:

~~Target Long-Term Incentive~~met these design objectives:

LOGO

Our 2016 NEO Compensation

~~______~~


~~(1)~~	Compensation for Mr. O’Leary is not included in the amounts reflected due to his status as interim CFO and the distinct nature of his compensation. Compensation for Ms. Cornell is included on an annualized basis.

30
~~Table of Contents~~

~~Our 2015 NEO Pay~~ Reflects Our Overall ~~2015~~2016 Performance

During ~~2015,~~2016, our financial results were affected by ~~softening of sales~~mix and manufacturing performance as well as increases in ~~certain markets, currency pressures,~~research, selling and ~~operating expenses, offset by contributions from our recent acquisitions.~~administrative costs, including planned strategic investments. For the year, on a currency neutral basis, we achieved 5% sales growth, 8%4% adjusted operating profit growth, and ~~11%~~6% adjusted earnings per share ~~growth, in each case within our long-term growth targets.~~growth. In addition, we delivered a three-year Total Shareholder Return at the ~~80th~~66th percentile relative to the S&P 500. As a result of our financial and operational results, (1) our AIP achievement levels ~~ranged from~~were approximately ~~42%~~73% for those executive officers evaluated at the corporate level, ~~to 39%~~62% for our Group President, Fragrances and ~~41%~~80% for our Group President, Flavors and (2) our ~~2015~~2014-2016 LTIP ~~achievement level was approximately 117% of target.~~

~~2015 Annual Incentive Plan Targets and Payout.~~ For 2015, our AIP was based on the achievement of (1) four financial performance metrics that management and the Board believe are significant indicators of our financial performance: (i) local currency sales growth, (ii) operating profit, (iii) gross margin and (iv) working capital and (2) individual objectives relating to leadership, succession planning and people development. Financial performance metrics are measured (A) at the consolidated corporate level for our CEO, CFO, interim CFO and General Counsel and (B) at both the consolidated corporate level and the business unit level for the Group Presidents of Fragrances and Flavors.

For 2015, at the corporate level, we achieved between threshold and target for three of the four financial performance metrics and did not meet the threshold for one of the financial performance metrics. As a result, the overall corporate AIP payout was approximately ~~42%~~107.6% of ~~the target award for~~target.

40IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Our Vision 2020 strategy, which was adopted in 2015, focuses on four pillars to build differentiation, accelerate profitable growth, and increase shareholder value.

LOGO

Vision 2020 Strategy

Innovating Firsts

Win Where We
Compete

Become Our
Customers’
Partner of Choice

Strengthen and
Expand the
Portfolio

Ø Drive differentiation in key technologies

Ø Develop responsible products to meet the future needs of our customers and consumers

Ø Lead in key markets

Ø Close gaps across value enhancing categories

Ø Achieve #1 position with targeted customers

Ø Actively support our customers’ success

Ø Achieve commercial excellence and service leadership

Ø Strengthen the Flavors and Fragrances core

Ø Stretch into adjacencies

Ø Pursue partnerships and collaborations

During 2016, we made significant progress on our ~~CEO, CFO, interim CFO~~Vision 2020 strategic objectives including:

Achieved growth in encapsulation-related and ~~General Counsel, whom are evaluated solely on corporate performance for purposes of~~modulation portfolio sales;

Launched and commercialized four flavor modulators;

Commercialized four captive fragrance ingredients;

Achieved growth in North America Consumer Fragrances;

Strengthened our AIP. Our Fragrance business unit achieved between threshold and target for three of the four financial performance metrics and did not meet the threshold for one of the four performance metrics. This resultedposition in ~~an AIP payout, when combined~~Flavors North America with the ~~corporate level performance,~~acquisition of David Michael and reinforced our differentiated service model for US middle-market customers;

Expanded business access through core list status with two multinational customers;

Deployed an industry-first, wind turbine at our Tilburg, Netherlands facility;

Became the first flavor and fragrance company to join the World Economic Forum;

Achieved CDP “A” List rating for second consecutive year; and

Announced the purchase of Fragrance Resources – closed in January 2017 – to further improve our market position in specialty fine fragrances.

During 2016, we continued to make strategic and financial progress, despite a challenging global environment. Both the Flavors and Fragrances business units successfully delivered solid top and bottom-line growth. During 2016, we paid $184.9 million in dividends to our shareholders, increased our quarterly dividend by 15% to $0.64 per share in August 2016 and repurchased approximately ~~39%~~1.1 million shares of ~~the~~common stock for $127 million. The total payout ratio (total cash returned to shareholders in dividend payments and share repurchases compared to adjusted net income) was 71% of adjusted net income, exceeding our target ~~award for our Group President, Fragrances. Our Flavors business unit performance exceeded target for one~~range of the four financial performance metrics, was between threshold and target for two of the four performance metrics and did not meet the threshold for one of the financial performance metrics. This resulted in an AIP payout, when combined with the corporate level performance, of approximately 43% of the target award for our Group President, Flavors.

50% to 60%.

~~Long-Term Incentive Plan Results for 2015.~~IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT Our LTIP is structured in three-year cycles, which are administered in four equally-weighted performance segments: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3 (each an “annual performance segment”) and cumulative performance over the three-year period (the “cumulative performance segment”). During the three annual performance segments, Company performance is measured against two equally-weighted financial metrics, Economic Profit (“EP”) and relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”). Relative TSR is the sole financial metric for the cumulative performance segment for all of the current LTIP cycles.41

For 2015, our EP was $273 million, as adjusted for 2015 non-core items. As a result, our NEOs earned approximately 34% of the EP goal for the 2015 segment of its current LTIP cycles. Our TSR for 2015 was at the 80th percentile and generated a payout of approximately 200%. Our cumulative TSR for the 2013-2015 LTIP cycle was at the 74th percentile, and resulted in a 196% payout.

~~For additional details regarding the AIP and LTIP, including the threshold, target and maximum levels for each performance metric, please see the sections below titled “Direct~~

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Compensation ~~Components and 2015 Compensation Decisions “- Annual Incentive Plan” and “- Long Term Incentive Plan.”~~

~~Compensation-Related Corporate~~ Governance

To ensure continued alignment of compensation with Company performance and the creation of shareholder value on a long term, sustainable basis, we maintain strong compensation-related corporate governance ~~policies, including the following:~~

Our clawback policies for recovery of cash and equity compensation from executives apply to accounting restatements, financial restatements and misstatements (without regard to fault), an employee’s willful misconduct or violation of a Company policy that is materially detrimental to the Company, and an employee’s violation of non-competition, non-solicitation, confidentiality and similar covenants;

We require our executives, including our NEOs, to meet share retention guidelines to align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders, as described above under “Share Retention Policy”;

~~Table of Contents~~

~~We do not permit short-sales or hedging of our stock by our employees, officers or directors;~~

Our Executive Severance Policy (“ESP”) provides that all equity awards are subject to a “double trigger” and only accelerate in connection with a change in control if an ESP participant is terminated without cause or terminates for “good reason” within two years following a change in control; and

~~None of our NEOs are entitled to a tax gross-up for severance payments.~~

~~Compensation Setting Process~~

~~AnnualReview~~

Our Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) is responsible for overseeing the design, implementation and administration of short-term and long-term compensation (including equity awards, benefits and perquisites) for all executive officers and other members of senior management. The Committee recommends CEO compensation to the independent directors of the Board for their approval. In connection with the approval of the 2015 compensation program, including individual targets, as in prior years, the Committee engaged W.T. Haigh & Company (“Haigh & Company”) as its independent compensation consultant to assist the Committee in fulfilling its responsibilities. From late 2014 through August 2015, Haigh & Company’s work with the Committee included analyses, advice, guidance and recommendations on executive compensation levels versus peers, market trends and incentive plan designs, and the design of our 2015 SAIP. In addition, Haigh & Company provided the Committee with advice and recommendations regarding compensation provided to Ms. Cornell in connection with her hiring. In August 2015, the Compensation Committee directly engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) as its independent consultant. FW Cook works with the Committee to provide it with analyses, advice, guidance and recommendations on executive compensation levels versus peers, market trends and incentive plan designs. Both Haigh & Company and FW Cook were engaged exclusively by the Committee on executive and director compensation matters and do not have other consulting arrangements with the Company. The Compensation Committee considered the independence of each of Haigh & Company and FW Cook and determined that no conflicts of interest were raised.

Our CEO and CHRO evaluate the individual performance and, with input from the Committee’s independent consultant, the competitive pay positioning for senior management members that report directly to the CEO, including our NEOs, and make recommendations to the Committee concerning each such executive’s target compensation. Our CEO follows the same process with regard to the target compensation for our CHRO, without her input, and the Committee follows the same process with regard to the target compensation for our CEO, without his input.

As part of its compensation setting process, the Committee also considers the results of the prior year’s shareholder advisory vote on our executive compensation. The Committee believes these voting results provide useful insight as to whether shareholders agree that the Committee is achieving its goal of designing and administering an executive compensation program that promotes the best interests of the Company and its shareholders by providing its executives with appropriate compensation and meaningful incentives to deliver strong financial performance and increase shareholder value. As part of its 2015 compensation setting process, the Committee reviewed the results of the 2014 shareholder advisory vote, in which 94.6% of the votes cast were voted in favor of our executive compensation program.

~~New Executive Officer Compensation~~

In May 2015, in connection with our hiring of Ms. Cornell as CFO, the Committee approved Ms. Cornell’s compensation package after consultation with the Committee’s compensation consultant. As part of establishing Ms. Cornell’s compensation package, the Committee reviewed the compensation package of the Company’s prior CFO and the median to 75th percentile of the relevant market benchmarks. The Committee approved offering Ms. Cornell a base salary of $560,000, an AIP target of 80%, and an ECP award of $500,000 (pro-rated for time she served as CFO during 2015). Consistent with the treatment of previous newly-hired senior executives, Ms. Cornell was also granted pro-rata participation in each of the current LTIP cycles, with a pro-rated LTIP target award for each of the current three-year performance cycles equal to $500,000. The Committee also approved a one-time sign-on cash bonus of $250,000. The Committee believed that the $250,000 cash bonus would facilitate Ms. Cornell selecting PRS for her pro-rated ECP award of $250,000, which requires a co-investment, and therefore further align her interests with those of the shareholders.

~~Table of Contents~~

Concurrently with Ms. Cornell’s appointment as CFO, Mr. O’Leary, who had been serving as our Interim CFO, was appointed to serve as our Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer. In this role, the Committee approved an increase to Mr. O’Leary’s on-going base salary to $400,000. In accordance with the terms of his agreement to serve as Interim CFO, during such service, Mr. O’Leary received an additional $15,000 per month in base salary, of which $7,500 was paid each month and $7,500 was deferred until three months following the appointment of Ms. Cornell. All other terms of Mr. O’Leary’s compensation remained unchanged.

~~Principles for Setting Compensation Targets~~

On an annual basis, the Committee reviews and approves the compensation of our NEOs. We use a global grading structure for our NEOs, with compensation ranges for each grade. Our NEOs are placed in a particular grade based on internal factors (including scope of responsibilities and job complexity) and an external market evaluation. The external market evaluation is based on published third party general survey information and a review of similar positions within our selected peer groups described below. This process is referred to as “market benchmarking.”

~~Market Benchmarking~~

The Committee reviews its external market benchmarking and peer group data annually. The Committee��s goals are to position (i) target total cash compensation at median or slightly above and (ii) target total direct compensation (salary, annual incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation) between the median to 75th percentile of relevant market benchmarks. In July 2014, the Committee reviewed peer group data with our independent compensation consultant for purposes of determining the appropriate peer group for setting 2015 compensation levels and opportunities.

~~2015 Benchmarking for the CEO, CFO and Group Presidents~~. For 2015 compensation decisions regarding (i) the CEO, (ii) the CFO (which was evaluated at the time of her appointment) and (iii) each of the Group Presidents, the Committee, based on recommendations from Haigh & Company, decided to benchmark compensation against the average of (1) its Select Peer Group of consumer products-based companies and (2) the General Industry Cut of the Towers Watson General Industry Index Survey.

The Committee annually reviews the Select Peer Group versus the criteria set forth below, taking into consideration its belief that short-term market and performance volatility should not affect the benefit of maintaining a level of consistency within the Select Peer Group:

policies.


1.	~~U.S. publicly traded companies of comparable size with manufacturing operations (generally based on revenue of $1B - $7B and market capitalization of $1B - $14B);~~


2.	~~Strong in-house R&D activities;~~


3.	~~Global scope with significant international presence (international operations generally accounting for at least 25% of total revenues);~~


4.	~~Growth orientation, with positive sales and earnings growth over the three years prior to the review and selection of the peer group;~~


5.	~~Companies with which we compete for executive talent; and~~


6.	~~Progressive companies with positive reputations.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~For 2015, the Select Peer Group consisted of the following companies:~~



~~Church & Dwight Co., Inc.~~	~~Hormel Foods Corporation~~
~~The Clorox Company~~	~~Jarden Corporation~~
~~Coty, Inc.~~	~~McCormick & Company, Incorporated~~
~~Elizabeth Arden, Inc.~~	~~Newell Rubbermaid Inc.~~
~~Energizer Holdings, Inc.~~	~~Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.~~
~~The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.~~	~~Revlon, Inc.~~
~~Herbalife Ltd.~~	~~Sensient Technologies Corporation~~
~~The Hershey Company~~	~~Tupperware Brands Corporation~~

There were four companies in the Select Peer Group that did not meet all of the desired criteria-Elizabeth Arden, Estee Lauder, Hershey and Jarden. Each of Hershey, Jarden and Estee Lauder were slightly above either the revenue or market capitalization criteria, while Elizabeth Arden was slightly below the market capitalization criteria. The Committee decided to keep these companies in the Select Peer Group (i) based on the significant comparability of these businesses to one of our two business units and (ii) to allow for year-over-year consistency in the peer group.

At the time of the Committee’s determination of the Select Peer Group, we were positioned at approximately the 38th percentile of the Select Peer Group in terms of revenue, the primary scope comparison measure, for the respective fiscal year. Our current relative revenue positioning remains at approximately the 38th percentile of the Select Peer Group.

As discussed above, the Committee weighted the compensation data derived from the General Industry Cut of the Towers Watson Survey equally with the Select Peer Group data. The General Industry Cut comprises 230 companies having $1 billion to $7 billion in reported revenues, with median revenues of $2.9 billion. Energy and financial companies were excluded from this selection as the Committee believed that the industry business models and the pay practices of these two industries are less comparable to ours, particularly in a volatile economic climate.

In August 2015, the Committee reviewed its Select Peer Group with Haigh & Company for purposes of its upcoming 2016 compensation setting process and determined that for 2016 the only change was the deletion of Energizer Holdings, as a result of its split into two companies, and the addition of Edgewell Personal Care, which consists of the former personal care division of Energizer Products.

~~2015 Benchmarking for Other Executive Officers~~. Based on recommendations by its compensation consultant, the Committee determined that the Select Peer Group did not provide sufficient comparative data for the other executive officer positions that were reviewed by the Committee. Consequently, for all other executive officer positions, including the General Counsel, instead of using the Select Peer Group, the Committee used the aggregate data available from a select cut of the Towers Watson General Industry Index that (i) identified themselves as belonging to the consumer products or the food and beverage industry and (ii) had revenues between $1 billion and $7 billion (the “Consumer Products Select Cut”). The Committee averaged (1) the Consumer Products Select Cut with (2) the Towers Watson General Industry Index to determine median and 75th percentile target compensation.

For 2015, Towers Watson modified its General Industry Index to remove Dr. Pepper Snapple Group. Inc., Flowers Foods and Owens Corning and to add Acuity Brands, Brown-Forman, Brunswick and Nu Skin Enterprises. Therefore, for 2015, the Consumer Products Select Cut comprised 23 companies, (including seven companies that are also part of the Select Peer Group) with median revenue of $4.4 billion. The companies included in the Consumer Products Select Cut were as follows:

~~Table of Contents~~



~~Acuity Brands~~ What We Do		~~Jack In The Box Inc.~~
~~Armstrong World Industries, Inc.~~	~~The J.M. Smucker Company~~ What We Don’t Do
~~Beam~~	~~Lorillard, Inc.~~
~~Brown-Forman~~ Pay for performance.A significant portion of the compensation for our NEOs is in the form ofat-risk variable compensation	~~Mattel, Inc.~~
~~Brunswick~~	~~Molson Coors Brewing Company~~
~~The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.~~	~~Newell Rubbermaid Inc.~~ No taxgross-upsfor NEOs for severance payments.
~~Hanesbrands Inc.~~	~~Nu Skin Enterprises~~
~~Harman International Industries, Incorporated~~ Base variable compensation onmultiple performance metrics to encourage balanced incentives	~~Polaris Industries Inc.~~
~~Hasbro, Inc.~~	~~Revlon, Inc.~~
~~The Hershey Company~~	~~Steelcase Inc.~~ No single-trigger vesting of cash or equity-based awards upon change in control
~~HNI~~	~~Tupperware Brands Corporation~~ Provideappropriate mix of fixed and variable compensation to reward company, business unit and individual performance		No short-sales, hedging or pledging of our stock by our employees, officers or directors
~~Hormel~~	Award a majority of variable compensationas equity-based awards		No fixed-duration employment agreementswith executive officers
	Haveexecutiveclawback policiesto recoup cash and equity compensation upon certain triggering events		No stock option/SAR repricing or exchangeof underwater options or SARs for cash
	Require our executives tomeet share retention guidelines
	Engage anindependent compensation consultant
	Engage in anannual risk assessment of our compensation programs

~~Use of Market Reference Ranges~~42. The Committee’s independent compensation consultant derives the median and 75th percentile “market reference” values for each executive position based on the average of the two relevant compensation indexes and uses these values to analyze each NEO’s actual pay from the prior fiscal year and base salary, target total cash compensation and target total direct compensation for the current year. This analysis is reviewed with the Committee and, in the case of the compensation of NEOs other than the CEO, with the CEO. In determining target total direct compensation for each executive in 2015, the Committee considered the consultant’s market reference analysis. In addition, the Committee considered a number of other important factors, including each executive’s:IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

~~individual experience and performance;~~

~~scope of responsibilities;~~

~~relative responsibilities compared with other senior Company executives;~~

~~contribution relative to overall Company performance;~~

~~compensation relative to his or her peers within the organization; and~~

~~long-term potential.~~

The Committee uses the market reference range in order to establish a starting point for the compensation levels that the Committee believes would provide our NEOs with competitive compensation. However, the actual target total direct compensation approved by the Committee may be above or below the market reference range based on the Committee’s review of market compensation levels, its desire to create internal pay equity among our executives and the individual factors set forth above.

For 2015, the target total direct compensation awarded by the Committee to Mr. Fibig and to each of Messrs. Haeni and Mirzayantz and Ms. Chwat was between or slightly below the targeted 50th to 75th percentile range. The target total direct compensation awarded by the Committee to Ms. Cornell, excluding a one-time sign on bonus, was also between the 50th and the 75th percentile of the relevant market reference range. The total actual compensation paid for the year, as compared to target compensation approved at the beginning of the year, may differ depending on Company and individual performance. Consequently, the actual pay received by a NEO may be higher or lower than his or her market reference range.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Compensation Elements and Targeted Mix

Our executive compensation program includes direct and indirect compensation elements. Our indirect compensation elements consist of (i) our Deferred Compensation Program, (ii) a limited perquisite program, (iii) severance and other benefits under our Executive Severance Policy, (iv) benefits under an Executive Death Benefit Plan and (v) long-term disability coverage. The Committee regularly reviews the costs and benefits of these programs.

~~Table of Contents~~

We believe that direct compensation should be the principal form of compensation. The table below provides a brief description of the principal elements of direct compensation, whether such compensation is fixed or variable, and the compensation program objectives served by each ~~pay~~ element. From time to time, the Committee may also approve discretionary ~~bonuses~~awards to executives in connection with their initial employment or for extraordinary individual performance, or a significant contribution to ~~Company~~the Company’s strategic objectives or ~~for~~ retention purposes.

In connection with his promotion to CFO, the Committee approved aone-time special retention RSU award to Mr. O’Leary equal in value to $1,000,000, which vests four years from the date of grant.



Element	Fixed or Variable		Primary Objective
Base Salary	Fixed Short-Term Cash	•	To attract and retain executives by offering salary that is competitive with market opportunities and that recognizes each executive’s position, role, responsibility and experience.
AIP award	Variable Short-Term Cash
~~AIP award~~	~~Variable~~	•	To motivate and reward the achievement of our annual performance objectives, including ~~local~~ currency neutral sales growth, operating profit, gross margin, working capital, and individual objectives.
LTIP award	Variable Long-Term Equity and Cash
~~LTIP award~~	~~Variable~~	•	To motivate and reward ~~the~~efficient capital allocation and annual profitability performance, measured by annual economic profit, and long-term shareholder value creation, measured by the ~~annual and~~ cumulative relative TSR performance over rolling three-year periods.
~~LTIP award~~	~~Variable~~	•	To align executives’ interests with those of shareholders by paying 50% of the earned award in shares of our common stock (with the remaining 50% ~~being payable~~settled in cash) and including relative TSR as a key measure of long-term performance.
ECP award	Variable Long-Term Equity
~~ECP award~~	~~Variable~~	•	To align executives’ interests with the interests of shareholders through equity-based compensation.
		•	To encourage direct investment in ~~the~~our Company.
		•	To serve as an important retention tool. • To recognize individual contributions.

The payouts under our AIP and LTIP plans are based on our achievement of performance metrics set at the beginning of the relevant measurement period. Our ECP awards are used as a retention tool and the amounts are determined at the beginning of each year and reflect the executive’s performance in the prior year. These payouts vary from year to year and thus compensation of our NEOs varies with performance.

For 2015, based on target AIP and LTIP achievement levels and actual ECP awards, the components of total direct compensation for Mr. Fibig and the average of the total direct compensation components for Messrs. Haeni and Mirzayantz and Mmes. Cornell and Chwat, as a group, were as follows:

~~Table of Contents~~

We believe that the significant portion of direct compensation that is variable; i.e., 78% in the case of Mr. Fibig and 73% in the case of Messrs. Haeni and Mirzayantz and Mmes. Cornell and Chwat, as a group, closely aligns our executives’ compensation opportunity with our performance by enabling our executives to earn more than target compensation if we achieve superior performance, or causing them to earn less than target compensation if we do not meet our performance goals or if the value of our common stock does not increase over time. The proportionately greater variable portion of direct compensation targeted for our CEO reflects his role and responsibility as our executive most accountable to our shareholders for company-wide performance.

Long-term compensation to our NEOs includes LTIP awards and ECP awards. LTIP awards, if earned, are paid 50% in common stock and 50% in cash. Equity makes up a larger portion of total long-term compensation than cash. This approach, combined with our Share Retention Policy discussed above, is intended to promote significant long-term share ownership by each of our executives and to align their interests, and their at-risk longer term compensation, with those of our shareholders.

The Committee periodically reviews the mix between variable and fixed and short-term and long-term incentive compensation opportunities and between cash and ~~non-cash~~equity opportunities based on (1) benchmarking and other external data provided by our independent compensation consultant, (2) recommendations from our independent compensation consultant and (3) recommendations from our CEO and CHRO.

~~Direct~~

Our indirect compensation elements consist of (1) our Deferred Compensation ~~Components~~Program and ~~2015~~401(k) savings plan, (2) a perquisite program, (3) severance and other benefits under our Executive Severance Policy, (4) benefits under an Executive Death Benefit Plan and (5) long-term disability coverage. The Committee regularly reviews the costs and benefits of these programs.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 43

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2016 Compensation ~~Decisions~~

Salaries

The Committee reviews the salaries of our NEOs annually, and adjusts salaries periodically. In February ~~2015,~~2016, the Committee reviewed the base salaries of its ~~NEOs. As a result~~NEOs after consultation with its independent compensation consultant. Mr. Fibig’s base salary was increased by 8.3% pursuant to the terms of ~~this review, the~~his offer letter. Mr. Haeni’s and Ms. Chwat’s base salaries ~~of each of Messrs. Haeni and Mirzayantz,~~ were increased by 5% and 2.2%, respectively, following a review of external market data and based upon the recommendations of the CEO. The base salaries of Mr. ~~Fibig~~Mirzayantz and Ms. ~~Chwat~~Cornell remained unchanged. Mr. ~~Haeni,~~O’Leary, who ~~had been~~was appointed ~~to his position~~EVP and CFO in ~~April 2014,~~October 2016, received a ~~$40,000~~salary increase ~~and Mr. Mirzayantz received a $60,000 increase~~from $400,000 to $500,000 in ~~April 2015.~~

connection with his promotion.

Annual Incentive Plan

~~The Committee maintains the~~

During 2016, our AIP ~~for~~continued to compensate our ~~NEOs and other employees. Overall, the Committee seeks to establish corporate performance goals that are challenging yet attainable. For our NEOs, 2015 AIP payouts depended~~executive officers based on the achievement of certain levels of (1) ~~specific Company-wide quantitative~~Company financial performance ~~goals~~ and (2) individual performance, in each case againstpre-defined, challenging performance targets. Financial performance metrics are measured (A) at the ~~case of~~consolidated corporate level for our CEO, CFO, former CFO and General Counsel and (B) at both the consolidated corporate level and the business unit level for the Group Presidents ~~business unit goals as well,~~of Fragrances and ~~(2) individual objectives relating to~~Flavors. Individual performance is measured in the key areas of leadership, succession planning and people ~~development.~~ development as we believe that the strength of our employees will be key to our ability to build differentiation and accelerate growth.

The 2016 weightings for our NEOs at both the consolidated corporate level and the business unit level remained unchanged and continued to assign greater weight to currency neutral sales growth and operating profit than gross margin and working capital because the Committee believes that these two performance metrics are the most relevant measures of overall annual Company performance and are key to driving sustained long-term growth.

The performance metrics for the 2016 AIP and their assigned weightings were as follows:

Annual Incentive Program


	Currency neutral sales growth	Operating profit	Gross Margin		Working Capital	Individual Performance Metric	Total Weighting
All NEOs Except Group Presidents Corporate Weighting	40%	25%		15%	10%	10%		100%


	Currency neutral sales growth	Operating profit	Gross Margin		Working Capital	Individual Performance Metric	Total Weighting
Group Presidents Corporate Weighting	20%	12.5%		0%	10%	0%		100%
Group Presidents Business Unit Weighting	20%	12.5%		15%	0%	10%		100%

44IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Each year the Committee sets an AIP target (stated as a percentage of base salary) for each NEO. For ~~2015,~~2016, the Committee maintained the AIP percentage targets at the same level as ~~2014.~~

2015 Salary
Target AIP as
  % Base Salary
AIP Target
Andreas Fibig
$1,200,000
120 %
$1,440,000
Alison A. Cornell(1)
$560,000
80 %
$448,000
Nicolas Mirzayantz
$600,000
80 %
$480,000
Matthias Haeni
$500,000
80 %
$400,000
Anne Chwat
$465,000
60 %
$279,000
Richard O’Leary(2)
$445,311
50 %
$220,603

2015.


	2016 Salary		Target AIP as % Base Salary	AIP Target
Andreas Fibig	$	1,300,000	120%	$	1,560,000
Richard O’Leary (1)	$	422,131	58%	$	244,262
Nicolas Mirzayantz	$	600,000	80%	$	480,000
Matthias Haeni	$	525,000	80%	$	420,000
Anne Chwat	$	475,000	60%	$	285,000
Alison A. Cornell	$	560,000	80%	$	448,000


(1)	Reflects ~~Ms. Cornell’s~~Mr. O’Leary’s salary, target AIP percentage and AIP target ~~on an annualized basis. Her actual 2015 AIP payout was calculated~~ on a pro rata basis, ~~to reflect her appointment~~based on his salary ($400,000) and target AIP percentage (50%) as ~~CFO effective as of July 8, 2015.~~

~~(2)~~

Includes Mr. O’Leary’s salary as interim CFO through Ms. Cornell’s appointment as CFO in July 2015 (including the $7,500 per month that was deferred until appointment of the permanent CFO) and asSVP, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer ~~thereafter. Mr. O’Leary’s~~from January 2016 through October 2016 and his salary ($500,000) and target AIP ~~target~~ percentage ~~remained unchanged following his change in role.~~(80%) as EVP and CFO from October 2016 through December 2016.

~~Table of Contents~~

Performance Metrics and Capped AIP Payouts: Based on a review of the annual and long-term financial goals, operational plans, strategic initiatives and the prior year’s actual results, the Committee annually sets the financial performance metrics for ~~the~~our Company and the respective business units that it will use to measure performance as well as the relative weighting that will be assigned to each metric. The Committee then approves threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance metric. Upon achievement of the relative performance level, an executive has the opportunity to earn upthreshold (25%), target (100%) and maximum (200%) amounts. The Committee seeks to establish corporate performance goals that are challenging yet attainable.

As discussed above, for 2016 AIP awards, the Committee approved the following ~~AIP target award~~four financial performance metrics and the individual performance objectives for ~~such metric:~~

the reasons noted below:



~~Threshold~~			—
2016 AIP Performance Metrics				25	%Reasons for Selection
~~Target~~	—Financial		~~100~~	%
	~~Maximum~~	— Currency neutral sales growth		~~200~~	%

~~2015 AIP Performance Metrics~~: As discussed above, for 2015 AIP awards, the Committee approved (1) the following four financial performance metrics: (i) local currency sales growth, (ii) operating profit, (iii) gross margin percentage and (iv) working capital percentage; and (2) individual leadership objectives. The financial performance metrics were selected for the following reasons:

Local currency sales growth reflects both increases in market share and sales expansion, which drives increases in gross profit. By measuring achievement exclusive of currency fluctuations, this goal helps to ensure that we are rewarding real

• Reflects both increases in market share and sales expansion, which drives increases in gross profit. By measuring achievement exclusive of currency fluctuations, this goal helps to ensure that we are rewarding actual incremental growth.

An increase in operating profit (in dollar terms) encourages the management of gross profit dollars against operating expenses. Achieving this goal helps provide the Company with the funding to reinvest in the business to drive future growth.

~~Improvement in gross margin percentage is an important measure for analyzing our ability to effectively recover increases in the cost of raw materials, cost discipline and operating efficiencies.~~

~~Reductions in working capital drive better operating cash flow generation. For this purpose, we define working capital as inventories and trade accounts receivable less trade accounts payable.~~

~~In addition, each NEO was assigned individual leadership objectives that were reflective of our focus on continuing to develop the people of our organization.~~

~~For 2015, the weighting assigned to each of the performance metrics was as follows:~~

Corporate Participants(1) Business Unit Participants(2)
Performance Metric Corporate Weighting Bus. Unit Weighting Corporate Weighting Bus. Unit Weighting Total Weighting
Local Currency Sales Growth 40 % 0 % 20 % 20 % 40 %
Operating Profit 25 % 0 % 12.5 % 12.5 % 25 %
Gross Margin 15 % 0 % 0 % 15 % 15 %
Working Capital 10 % 0 % 10 % 0 % 10 %
Individual 10 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 10 %
Total 100 % 0 % 42.5 % 47.5 % 100 %


~~(1)~~	~~All NEOs except our two Group Presidents.~~

Operating profit		• An increase in operating profit (in dollar terms) encourages the management of gross profit dollars against operating expenses. Achieving this goal helps provide us with the funding to reinvest in the business to drive future growth.
~~(2)~~	~~Our two Group Presidents.~~Gross margin percentage		• Improvement in gross margin percentage is an important measure for analyzing our ability to effectively recover increases in the cost of raw materials, cost discipline and operating efficiencies. • Gross margin also promotes greater focus on R&D and innovation.
		Working capital percentage		• Reductions in working capital drive better operating cash flow generation. For this purpose, we define working capital as inventories and trade accounts receivable less trade accounts payable.
Individual		Individual performance objectives		• Reflects our focus on continuing to develop the people of our organization and ensuring strong leadership and robust succession planning.

For 2015, a new individual performance metric was introduced as the Committee believes establishing operating objectives tied to the development of our people and the next generation of leadership will directly contribute to building differentiation and accelerating growth on a sustainable basis. Working capital and operating profit metrics were reduced by 5% each to accommodate the new metric. Otherwise, 2015 weightings for corporate and business unit participants remained unchanged, and continue to assign greater weight to local currency sales growth and operating profit goals because the Committee believes that these two performance metrics are the most relevant measures of overall annual Company performance and are key to driving sustained long-term growth.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 45

~~Table of Contents~~

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Determination of ~~2015~~2016 Performance ~~Levels~~Levels: In determining our ~~2015~~2016 AIP performance threshold, target and maximum levels, the Committee considered our annual targets for ~~2015,~~2016, our ~~2014~~2015 actual results and payout trends over the prior three-year and five-year ~~periods and the pro forma impact of the Aromor acquisition.~~periods. The performance target ~~level was~~levels for the financial metrics were set in line with our ~~2015~~2016 budget and above our ~~2014~~2015 actual ~~results, and the threshold performance target level was set above the low end of our Company’s long-term strategic growth targets.~~

~~2015~~results.

2016 Corporate and Business Unit AIP Performance: Our actual performance against our ~~2015~~2016 AIP corporate financial metrics is set forth in the tables below. In establishing AIP financial performance metrics and in determining actual achievement against performance metrics, we eliminated the net impact of certainnon-core expenses andnon-core gains in order to reflect our fundamental operating results. ~~2015~~2016 LTIP and AIP target performance levels and actual achievement against the target performance levels excluded costs or income associated with (i) adjustments related to ~~the closing~~operational improvement initiative costs and restructuring charges, and reversal of ~~our Fragrance ingredients plant in Augusta, Georgia,~~certain severance accruals, (ii) ~~plant closings and relocations in Asia,~~tax adjustments related to imputed interest income received on amounts previously deposited for loss provision, (iii) acquisition related items, (iv) ~~items~~an increase in the loss provision related to the ~~reclassification of certain liability accounts,~~ZoomEssence litigation, and (v) ~~adjustments related to profit improvement initiatives undertaken in the fourth quarter of 2015, (vi)~~ with respect to ~~2015 LTIP only, certain tax-related items, and (vii) with respect to 2015~~the operating profit metric of the 2016 AIP only, unbudgetedmark-to-market adjustments related to our Deferred Compensation Plan (together, the ~~“2015~~ “2016non-core items”). Similarly, we excluded the effects of incentive compensation provisions in calculating gross margin performance in order to better focus on the underlying operating performance of our product portfolio. The Committee believes that the necessary self-funding of incentive compensation payments is covered in the operating profit component of the AIP program.

Corporate Performance

The table below reflects the ~~2015~~2016 AIP metrics, their respective targets and the payouts earned for each metric and overall by each of Messrs. Fibig and O’Leary and Mmes. ~~Cornell~~Chwat and ~~Chwat,~~Cornell, who were all evaluated solely on corporate performance.

Performance Metric Threshold Target Maximum Actual
Award
Payout
(as % of
Target)

Corporate
Weighting

Total
Weighted
Award
Local Currency Sales Growth 2.3 % 4.8 % 7.3 % 2.7 % 37.0 % 40 % 14.8 %
Operating Profit $611M
$643M
$675M
$603M
—
25 % —
Gross Margin 44.0 % 45.5 % 47.0 % 45.0 % 75.0 % 15 % 11.3 %
Working Capital 30.0 % 28.5 % 27.0 % 28.7 % 91.7 % 10 % 9.2 %
Individual Objectives —
—
—
100.0 % 69.0 % 10 % 6.9 %
Total Award (as % Target) 25 % 100 % 200 % —
100 % 42.2 %

~~During 2015,~~

Corporate Level

LOGO

As indicated above, during 2016, our corporate performance was between ~~threshold~~target and ~~target for three of the performance metrics, local currency sales growth, gross margin and working capital, and was below~~ threshold for ~~the remaining~~each financial performance ~~metric, operating profit.~~metric. The actual dollar amount earned by each NEO is set forth below under ~~“2015~~“2016 Individual AIP Payouts.” With respect to the individual objectives component, the Committee reviewed each ~~NEOs~~NEO’s performance in ~~2015~~2016 against ~~the NEO’s~~his or her leadership and execution of strategic and organizational individual objectives established by the Committee. The Committee determined that each NEO had met his or her individual objectives for ~~2015.~~

2016.

46IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Fragrance~~

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Fragrances Business Unit Performance

The table below reflects the ~~2015~~2016 AIP metrics, their respective targets and the payouts earned for each metric and overall by Mr. Mirzayantz, our Group President, ~~Fragrance.~~

Performance
Metric
Threshold Target Max.
Award
Payout
(as % of
Target)

Bus.
Unit
Weight

Bus. Unit
Weighted
Award

Corp.
Weight %

Corp.
Weighted
Award

Total
Weighted
Award
Local Currency Sales Growth 2.2 % 4.7 % 7.2 % 37.0 % 20 % 7.4 % 20 % 7.4 % 14.8 %
Operating Profit $333M
$349M
$376M
—
12.5 % —
12.5 % —
—
Gross Margin 44.3 % 45.8 % 47.3 % 50.0 % 15 % 7.5 % —
—
7.5 %
Working Capital 33.2 % 31.5 % 29.8 % 95.5 % 0%
—
10 % 9.2 % 9.2 %
Individual —
—
—
69.0 % 10 % 6.9 % —
—
6.9 %
Total Award (as % Target) 25 % 100 % 200 % —
57.5 % —
42.5 % —
38.4 %

~~During 2015,~~Fragrances.

Fragrances Business Unit

LOGO

As indicated above, during 2016, our ~~Fragrance~~Fragrances business unit performance was between threshold and target for ~~three of the~~each financial performance ~~metrics, local currency sales growth, gross margin and working capital, and was below threshold for the remaining performance metric, operating profit.~~metric. The actual dollar amount earned by our Group President, ~~Fragrance~~Fragrances is set forth below under ~~“2015~~“2016 Individual AIP Payouts.”

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 47

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Flavors Business Unit Performance

The table below reflects the ~~2015~~2016 AIP metrics, their respective targets and the payouts earned for each metric and overall by Mr. Haeni, our Group President, Flavors.

Performance
Metric
Threshold Target Max.
Award
Payout
(as % of
Target)

Bus.
Unit
Weight

Bus. Unit
Weighted
Award
Corp. Weight %
Corp
Weighted
Award

Total
Weighted
Award
Local Currency Sales Growth 2.8 % 5.3 % 7.8 % 37.0 % 20 % 7.4 % 20 % 7.4 % 14.8 %
Operating Profit $326M
$342M
$369M
—
12.5 % —
12.5 % —
—
Gross Margin 43.0 % 44.5 % 46.0 % 65.0 % 15 % 9.8 % —
—
9.8 %
Working Capital 26.6 % 25.3 % 24.0 % 115.0 % 0%
—
10 % 9.2 % 9.2 %
Individual —
—
—
69.0 % 10 % 6.9 % —
—
6.9 %
Total Award (as % Target) 25 % 100 % 200 % —
57.5 % —
42.5 % —
40.7 %

Flavors Business Unit

LOGO

During ~~2015,~~2016, our Flavors business unit performance was between target and maximum for ~~one~~the business unit component of ~~the~~operating profit and working capital performance metrics, ~~working capital, was~~and between threshold and target for ~~two~~the currency neutral sales growth, the corporate component of ~~the performance metrics, local currency sales growth~~operating profit and gross margin ~~and was below threshold for the remaining~~ performance ~~metric, operating profit.~~metrics. The actual dollar amount earned by our Group President, Flavors is set forth below under ~~“2015~~“2016 Individual AIP Payouts.”

~~Table of Contents~~

~~2015~~

2016 Individual AIP Payouts

The AIP payout for ~~2015~~2016 for the NEOs, based on the actual achievement of each of the performance metrics, is included in the ~~“Non-Equity~~“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement. Based on the Corporate and Business Unit performance outlined in the tables above, ~~2015~~2016 AIP payouts were as follows:

2015
AIP Target ($)
2015 Payout
Executive As % of Target Award ($)
Andreas Fibig
$1,440,000
42 %
$607,680
Alison Cornell(1)
$448,000
20 %
$91,679
Nicolas Mirzayantz
$480,000
38 %
$184,320
Matthias Haeni
$400,000
41 %
$162,800
Anne Chwat
$279,000
42 %
$117,738
Richard O’Leary(2)
$220,603
42 %
$93,094


	2016 AIP Target ($)		2016 Payout
Executive	2016 AIP Target ($)		As % of Target		Award ($)
Andreas Fibig	$	1,560,000		73%	$	1,134,120
Richard O’Leary (1)	$	244,262		73%	$	177,579
Nicolas Mirzayantz	$	480,000		62%	$	297,600
Matthias Haeni	$	420,000		80%	$	336,840
Anne Chwat	$	285,000		73%	$	207,195
Alison Cornell (2)	$	448,000		73%	$	253,616

48IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Threshold Target Maximum Award Payout as a % of Target
2.7% 5.4% 8.1% 16.1% Currency Neutral Sales Growth (Business Unit) Actual 4.7%
2.5% 5.2% 7.9% 14.4% Currency Neutral Sales Growth (Corporate) Actual 4.2%
$322M $337M $362M 13.8% Operating Profit (Business Unit) Actual $339.5M
$599M $631M $663M 9.4% Operating Profit (Corporate) Actual $620M
43.9% 45.4% 46.9% 10.5% Gross Margin (Business Unit) Actual 44.8%
26.6% 25.3% 24.0% 6.0% Working Capital (Corporate) Actual 24.7%
100% 10.0% Individual Actual 100%
Overall Payout for Group President, Flavors 80.2%

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


(1)	Reflects ~~Ms. Cornell’s~~Mr. O’Leary’s AIP target on ~~an annualized basis. The~~a pro rata basis, based on his AIP target of 50% of salary as SVP, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer from January 2016 through October 2016 and his AIP target of 80% of salary as EVP and CFO from October 2016 through December 2016.

(2)	Ms. Cornell’s actual ~~2015~~2016 AIP payout was calculated on a pro rata basis to reflect her ~~appointment as CFO~~departure effective as of ~~July 8, 2015.~~October 11, 2016.


~~(2)~~	~~Mr. O’Leary’s actual 2015 AIP payment was calculated based on his actual salary received in 2015.~~

Long-Term Incentive Plan

We believe that LTIP awards reward our executive officers, including our NEOs, for financial results and align their interests with the interests of our shareholders. Annually, the Committee reviews the LTIP to determine (1) the metrics that should be used to encourage long-term success, (2) the weightings that should be applied to such metrics and (3) the annual and cumulative targets for such metrics. The Committee believes that commencing a new three-year LTIP cycle each ~~year (i)~~ year:

provides a regular opportunity tore-evaluate long-term metrics, ~~(ii)~~

aligns goals with the ongoing strategic planning process, and ~~(iii)~~

reflects our evolving business priorities and market factors.

The Committee also annually sets a total LTIP target award for each NEO, which reflects the total LTIP award a NEO has the opportunity to receive at the end of the three-year cycle if we meet all of our targets. ~~To the extent that we meet the minimum~~Depending upon our actual performance relative to financial and ~~TSR goals or the maximum financial and TSR~~relative total shareholder return goals, the actual payout to the NEO could be ~~significantly~~greater or less ~~or more~~ than the total LTIP target award.

Performance Segments.Given the difficulty in setting long-term goals in current volatile global economic environments, the Committee believes that the LTIP should continue to comprise four performance ~~segments. The performance segments consist of three annual performance segments (Year~~segments: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3 (each an “annual performance segment”) and ~~Year 3) and a~~ cumulative ~~segment covering~~performance over the three-year period ~~with 25% of~~(the “cumulative performance segment”).

Performance Metrics.For the ~~total~~2014-2016 LTIP ~~target award credited in~~and the 2015-2017 LTIP, each ~~performance segment.~~

~~Performance Metrics. During the three~~ annual performance ~~segments, Company performance~~segment is measured equally against ~~two equally-weighted~~Economic Profit (“EP”) (12.5%) and Relative Total Shareholder Return (“Relative TSR”) (12.5%). The Committee replaced the annual Relative TSR performance segments with a cumulative,3-year Relative TSR performance metric as the sole financial metric for the cumulative performance segment beginning with the 2016-2018 LTIP. The Committee believes that the cumulative,3-year performance period for Relative TSR better aligns its compensation objectives with the interests of our shareholders and our focus on long-term growth initiatives. The table below reflects the performance metrics ~~TSR~~for the outstanding LTIP cycles and ~~EP.~~ their assigned weightings:

Long-Term Incentive Program


	Segment	EP	Relative TSR
2014-2016 and 2015-2017 LTIP performance cycles	Year 1	12.5%	12.5%
	Year 2	12.5%	12.5%
	Year 3	12.5%	12.5%
	Cumulative Segment	0%	25%
	Total	37.5%	62.5%	100%

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 49

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


	Segment	EP	Relative TSR
2016-2018 LTIP performance cycle	Year 1	12.5%	0%
	Year 2	12.5%	0%
	Year 3	12.5%	0%
	Cumulative Segment	0%	62.5%
	Total	37.5%	62.5%	100%

We believe ~~that evaluating~~ EP ~~helps us identify~~is a key factor in identifying the sources and drivers of value across our businesses and that EP growth is closely linked to the creation of long-term shareholder value. EP measures operating profitability after considering ~~(i)~~(1) all our revenues and operating costs, ~~(ii)~~(2) income taxes and ~~(iii)~~(3) a charge for the capital employed in the business. Capital employed primarily consists of working capital, property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets. The capital charge is determined by applying the estimated weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) to the adjusted average invested capital employed (including changes and/or loss provisions associated withnon-operating events such as restructurings and tax or litigation settlements) during the relevant period. The estimated WACC rate is the ~~blended~~weighted average cost of our debt and equity capital. In determining the EP target for the ~~2015~~2016-2018 LTIP, the Committee considered our annual targets for ~~2015,~~2016, our ~~2014~~2015 actual results and payout trends over the prior three-year and five-year periods and thepro-forma impact of ~~the acquisitions of Lucas Meyer Cosmetics and Ottens Flavors.~~

~~For the cumulative performance segment, Company performance is measured by TSR.~~ recent acquisitions.

The Committee believes that three-year Relative TSR, as compared to other public companies in which shareholders may choose to invest, is a good indicator of our overall long-term performance, and directly ties our executives’ compensation opportunity to our share price appreciation and dividend payments relative to a majorlarge-cap index.

~~Table of Contents~~

Relative TSR is calculated by measuring the change in the market price of stock plus dividends paid (assuming the dividends are reinvested) for ~~the~~our Company and the S&P 500 companies over the performance period. The market price for purposes of calculating the Relative TSR of ~~the~~our Company and the S&P 500 on each ~~year-end or~~ cycle-end date is determined based on the average closing price per share of each company’s common stock over the period of 20 consecutive trading days preceding that date, as reported by S&P Capital IQ.

~~For each of~~

Our EP goal for the ~~three~~ annual performance segments of each of ~~the goals for EP and TSR~~our current LTIP cycles is set at the beginning of each annual performance ~~segment~~segment. The Relative TSR goal for the annual performance segments of the 2014-2016 and 2015-2017 LTIP cycles is ~~equally weighted. For~~set at the beginning of each annual performance segment. The Relative TSR goal for the cumulative performance segment ~~the TSR goal~~of each of our current LTIP cycles is set at the beginning of the three-year cycle.

~~The table below sets forth the relative weightings of each metric for each of our current LTIP cycles:~~

Segment
Economic Profit
(EP) Growth

Total Shareholder
Return (TSR)
relative to the S&P
500

Total Weighting of
Segment
Year 1 12.5 % 12.5 % 25 %
Year 2 12.5 % 12.5 % 25 %
Year 3 12.5 % 12.5 % 25 %
Cumulative Segment (Year 1-Year 3) 0 % 25 % 25 %
Total LTIP Cycle 37.5 % 62.5 % 100 %

At the end of each year, the Committee reviews our annual performance and cumulative performance for the newly completed three-year cycle. To the extent that our annual performance has met or exceeded the threshold annual EP goal, and for LTIP performance cycles prior to the 2016-2018 LTIP cycle, the threshold annual Relative TSR goal, the Committee approves “banking” the credit that will be applied to the payout at the end of the three-year cycle. For the completed three-year cycle, the Committee approves the total payout, taking into consideration the performance for each of the prior annual performance segments.

~~2015-2017~~

50IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2016-2018 LTIP Target Awards

In early ~~2015,~~2016, the Committee approved the following total LTIP target awards to each of our NEOs for the ~~2015-2017 performance cycle, other than Ms. Cornell’s LTIP target award which was approved in May 2015 as part of her employment arrangement:~~

2016-2018 LTIP:



~~NEO~~		NEO	Total LTIP Target Award
		Andreas Fibig		~~$2,000,000~~ $2,000,000
	~~Alison A. Cornell~~	Richard O’Leary (1)		$200,000
		Nicolas Mirzayantz		$500,000
	~~Nicolas Mirzayantz~~	Matthias Haeni		$500,000
	~~Matthias Haeni~~	Anne Chwat		$285,000
		Alison Cornell (2)		$500,000

~~Anne Chwat~~

(1)

~~$279,000~~

Mr. O’Leary’s LTIP target award for 2016 was set based on his position as SVP, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer; for 2017, Mr. O’Leary’s LTIP target award was changed to $500,000.

~~Richard O’Leary~~

~~$195,395~~


~~(1)~~(2)	Reflects Ms. Cornell’s LTIP target on an annualized basis. Ms. Cornell’s actual LTIP award ~~was pro-rated~~will be prorated to reflect her partial year of ~~employment.~~employment pursuant to her separation agreement.

The Committee set the cumulative three-year Relative TSR goal for the ~~2015-2017~~2016-2018 LTIP cycle at the same level that had been set for the prior year’s LTIP ~~cycle, as follows:~~

~~Table of Contents~~

cycle. For the ~~2015-2017~~2016-2018 LTIP cycle, the Committee determined that 50% of the value of any payouts would be denominated and paid in cash and 50% would be denominated and paid in shares, consistent with the ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 and ~~2014-2016~~2015-2017 LTIP cycles. The Committee believes that paying 50% of the LTIP value in shares creates a stronger alignment between executives and shareholders, and provides additional incentive for executives to achieve superior Company performance and to produce share price appreciation over the three-year performance cycle. The number of shares of our common stock for the 50% portion that would be paid in stock is determined based on the market price of the common stock at the beginning of the cycle. For the ~~2015~~2016 cycle, it was based on ~~$102.14~~$119.27 per share, the average closing market price for the twenty trading days prior to January ~~2, 2015,~~1, 2016, the first stock trading day of the cycle. At the conclusion of each of the first two annual performance segments, the dollar value and number of shares will be “banked” based on the performance of each such segment. When the final performance segment and the cumulative Relative TSR three-year cycle are concluded and the LTIP payouts are approved by the Committee, the cumulative dollar value and cumulative number of shares will be paid to the executive.

~~Annual~~

2016 LTIP ~~Goals and 2015 LTIP~~ Performance

In early 2015, the Committee also set the threshold, target and maximum 2015 annual EP goal and threshold, target and maximum annual TSR goal which applies to each of the three current LTIP performance cycles, as follows:



~~Criteria~~	~~Threshold (25%)~~	~~Target (100%)~~	~~Maximum (200%)~~
EP	~~$270M~~	~~$294M~~	~~$318M~~
~~Annual TSR vs S&P 500~~	~~35th percentile~~	~~55th percentile~~	~~75th percentile~~

~~LTIP Cycle Performance~~

For the ~~2015~~2016 segment of each of the existing LTIP cycles, our EP of ~~$273~~$247 million, as adjusted for ~~2015~~ 2016non-core items, was between threshold and target performance level. As a result, our NEOs earned approximately ~~34%~~77% of the EP goal for the year. Our Relative TSR for ~~2015~~2016 was below threshold at the ~~80th~~26th percentile versus the S&P 500, and as a result, our NEOs ~~earned approximately 200% of~~did not earn any awards based on the Relative TSR goal for the ~~2015 segment.~~2016 segments of the 2014-2016 and 2015-2017 LTIP cycles. The LTIP award earned and “banked” for the ~~2015~~2016 segment of ~~each existing~~the 2015-2017 and 2016-2018 LTIP ~~cycle~~cycles was therefore equal to approximately ~~117%~~38.4% of ~~target..~~

~~2013-2015~~target. As previously discussed, for the 2016-2018 LTIP grant cycle, the three annual Relative TSR performance segments were replaced with the cumulative,3-year Relative TSR segment.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 51

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2016 LTIP Results

LOGO

2014-2016 LTIP Payout

As noted above, our NEOs earned approximately ~~34%~~77% of the EP goal for ~~2015,~~2016, and our Relative TSR for ~~2015~~2016 was below threshold at the ~~80th percentile, resulting in~~26th percentile. As a result, our NEOs ~~earning approximately 200% of~~did not earn any award based on the Relative TSR goal for the ~~2015~~2016 segment. Our cumulative Relative TSR was positioned at approximately the ~~74th~~66th percentile versus the S&P 500, which equates to a payout of ~~196%~~152.5% of target.

The overall payout for the ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 LTIP cycle was approximately ~~142%~~108% of target, based on the following EP and Relative TSR results against objectives, as determined by the Committee.

Segment
Segment
Weighted
EP Result

Segment
Weighted
TSR Result

Combined
Segment
Weighted
Result

Segment
Weighting

Overall
Result
2013 191 % 77 % 133.8 % 25.00 % 33.4 %
2014 133 % 112 % 122.4 % 25.00 % 30.6 %
2015 34 % 200 % 117.0 % 25.00 % 29.3 %
Cumulative —
196 % 195.5 % 25.00 % 48.9 %

Total 100.00 % 142.2 %


Segment	Segment Weighted EP Result		Segment Weighted TSR Result			Combined Segment Weighted Result			Segment Weighting			Overall Result
2014		133%		112	%		122.4	%		25.00	%		30.6	%
2015		34%		200	%		117.0	%		25.00	%		29.2	%
2016		77%		0	%		38.4	%		25.00	%		9.6	%
Cumulative		—		152.5	%		152.5	%		25.00	%		38.1	%
Total										100.00	%		107.60	%

The LTIP payout for the ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 performance cycle for the NEOs, based on the actual achievement of quantitative objectives, is discussed in greater detail following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.

For the LTIP performance cycles that concluded in ~~2011 through and including 2015,~~the five-year period from 2012 to 2016, the actual overall corporate percentage payout under the LTIP against those long-term cycle performance goals ranged from approximately ~~105%~~107.6% to ~~150%~~149.9%, with an average payout of ~~133% over the five LTIP performance cycles.~~

130.3%.

52IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

~~Table of Contents~~

Equity Choice Program

We believe that equity is a key component of our long-term incentive compensation as it (1) provides participants with a meaningful stake in ~~the~~our Company, thereby aligning their interests more closely with shareholders, (2) encourages participants to focus on long-term success, ~~and~~ (3) helps to attract and retain top ~~talent.~~talent and (4) recognizes individual contributions. We believe that our ECP is an effective vehicle to encourage ownership as it provides participants the flexibility to allocate their award among three types of equity.

~~Annually~~

Under the ECP, participants, including all of our NEOs, may choose from three types of equity award grants. For ECP awards in 2016, these three types were (1) Purchased Restricted Stock Units (“PRSUs”), (2) stock settled appreciation rights (“SSARs”), and (3) Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”). PRSUs are assigned an adjustment factor of 120% to provide incentive to participants to invest in and accumulate shares to promote retention and increase alignment of participants’ interests with those of our shareholders. Elections are made in 5% increments. Based on the participant’s election, a participant’s dollar award value is converted into PRSUs, SSARs or RSUs on the grant date based on the market price of our common stock on such date.

The table below sets forth each of the three types of equity awards offered and their adjustment factor. During 2016, ECP participants, including all of our NEOs, made choices based on the different equity award types described below.


Types of Equity	Description of Equity Type	Adjustment Factor
PRSUs	PRSUs are restricted stock units that are granted as a match against shares of Company stock purchased at full value by an ECP participant on the grant date. As an incentive to promote share accumulation and direct investment in our stock, there is a 20% adjustment upward of the award value if PRSUs are elected. If an ECP participant chooses PRSUs, then he or she must deliver funds (or shares with an equivalent value) equal to the dollar amount of the ECP award (including the 20% adjustment). Upon receipt of the funds by the Company, the ECP participant receives a matching number of PRSUs. PRSU holders have no voting rights during the vesting period but accrue dividend equivalents on their PRSUs. PRSUs vest approximately three years from the date of grant. PRSUs are the most rapid way for participants to accumulate and build share ownership based on the participant’s direct investment in Company stock.	120%
SSARs	SSARs are a contractual right to receive the value, in shares of Company stock, of the appreciation in stock price from the SSAR grant date to the date the SSAR is exercised by the participant. Participants receive a number of SSARs equivalent to 4.5 times (i.e. the approximate binomial value of the SSARs) the elected SSAR award value divided by the grant price. SSARs provide upside potential for share accumulation and greater alignment with shareholders because SSARS only have value if the stock price increases after the grant date. The adjustment factor for SSARs is 1.0. SSARs become exercisable on a stated vesting date, which is approximately three years from the grant date, and expire on the seventh anniversary of the grant date. SSARs do not require a financial investment by the SSAR grantee.	100%
RSUs	RSUs are our promise to issue unrestricted shares of our stock on the stated vesting date, which is approximately three years from the grant date. The adjustment factor for RSUs is 1.0. RSUs do not require a financial investment by the RSU grantee.	100%

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 53

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Our Committee annually determines the dollar range of ECP awards for each level of participating executive based on peer group and long-term incentive practices survey data, a review of the competitiveness of the combined value of the ECP awards and LTIP awards with market practices and other factors that it deems appropriate. ~~In 2015, the Committee increased the range for ECP grants to our CEO from $750,000 to $2,250,000 with a midpoint of $1,500,000 to a range of $1,000,000 to $3,500,000with a midpoint of $2,000,000. The other~~For 2016, these ranges ~~remained the same in 2015 and~~ were as follows:

Lower Limit Midpoint Upper Limit
CEO $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,500,000
Group Presidents and CFO $250,000 $500,000 $750,000
General Counsel $175,000 $350,000 $525,000


	Lower Limit		Upper Limit
CEO	$	1,000,000	$ 3,500,000
Group Presidents and CFO	$	250,000	$ 750,000
General Counsel	$	175,000	$ 525,000

The Committee then approves the actual dollar award to be granted to each NEO other than the CEO, and recommends to the independent members of the Board for approval the actual dollar award for the CEO. All ECP awards are generally subject to a vesting period of approximately three years. The Committee believes the ECP is an attractive tool for recruiting, motivating and retaining executive talent and encourages alignment with shareholders by reinforcing investment and ownership in our Company by our executives.

ECP participants, including all of our NEOs, may choose from three types of equity award grants. For ECP granted in 2015, these three types were (1) Purchased Restricted Stock or Purchased Restricted Stock Units (“PRS”), (2) stock settled appreciation rights (“SSARs”), and (3) Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”). PRS is assigned an adjustment factor of 120% to provide incentive to participants to invest in and accumulate shares to promote retention and increase alignment of participants’ interests with those of our shareholders. Elections are made in 5% increments. Based on the participant’s election, a participant’s dollar award value is converted into PRS, SSARs or RSUs on the grant date based on the market price of our common stock on such date.

The table below sets forth each of the three types of equity awards offered and their adjustment factor. During 2015, ECP participants, including all of our NEOs, made choices based on the differences among the equity award types described below.

~~Table of Contents~~



~~Types of~~ ~~Equity~~	~~Description of Equity Type~~	~~Adjustment~~ ~~Factor~~
~~PRS~~	PRS are shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units, which the Company grants as a match against shares of our stock purchased at full value by an ECP participant on the grant date. As an incentive to promote share accumulation and direct investment in our stock, there is a 20% adjustment upward of the award value if PRS is elected. If an ECP participant chooses PRS, then he or she must deliver funds (or shares with an equivalent value) equal to the dollar amount of the ECP award (including the 20% adjustment) that he or she is electing to receive in PRS. Upon receipt of the funds by the Company, the ECP participant receives a matching number of PRS shares or RSUs from the Company. During the restricted period, a PRS holder has the same rights as an ordinary shareholder including the right to vote and dividend rights (or dividend equivalents in the case of restricted stock units). Holders of restricted stock units have no voting rights during the vesting period. On the vesting date, which is approximately three years from the date of grant, PRS shares become unrestricted. PRS shares are the most rapid way for participants to accumulate and build share ownership based on the participant’s direct investment in our stock.	~~120%~~
~~SSARs~~	SSARs are a contractual right to receive the value, in shares of Company stock, of the appreciation in our stock price from the SSAR grant date to the date the SSAR is exercised by the participant. As an approximation of binomial stock option valuation methods used under ASC Topic 718 (as used for financial reporting purposes), participants receive a number of SSARs equivalent to 4.5 times the elected SSAR award value divided by the grant price. SSARs provide upside potential for share accumulation and alignment with shareholders because SSARS only have value if the stock price increases after the grant date. The adjustment factor for SSARs is 1.0. SSARs become exercisable on a stated vesting date, which is approximately three years from the grant date, and expire on the seventh anniversary of the grant date. SSARs do not require a financial investment by the SSAR grantee.	~~100%~~
~~RSUs~~	RSUs are our promise to issue unrestricted shares of our stock on the stated vesting date, which is approximately three years from the grant date. The adjustment factor for RSUs is 1.0. RSUs do not require a financial investment by the RSU grantee.	~~100%~~

As an example of ~~how~~the value that may be delivered by the ECP ~~offers~~to the participant ~~a range of outcomes,~~based on the three election types, the following table shows the ~~different~~ number of shares and ~~values~~value to the participant at vesting for an ECP award of $500,000. For all three choices, vesting occurs approximately three years from the grant date:

Assumes a Common Share Value of $100.00 at Award(1)
PRS(2) RSUs SSARs(3)
Award Value
$500,000

$500,000

$500,000
Adjustment Factor 1.2
1.0
1.0
Post-Factor Value
$600,000

$500,000

$500,000
Participant Required Investment
$600,000
—
—
Award Shares/SSARs At Grant Date 6,000 Shares
5,000 Shares
22,500 SSARs
Dollar Value of Award At Vesting/Exercise (Assuming 8% Compounded Annual Stock Price Increase) (2)
$755,827

$629,856

$584,352
Dollar Value of Award At Vesting/Exercise (Assuming 8% Compounded Annual Stock Price Decrease)
$476,299

$396,916
—

~~______~~

~~(1)~~

~~Share~~


Assumes a Common Share Value of $100.00 at Award (1)
	PRSU (2)		RSUs		SSARs (3)
Award Value	$	500,000	$	500,000	$	500,000
Adjustment Factor		1.2		1.0		1.0
Post-Factor Value	$	600,000	$	500,000	$	500,000
Participant Required Investment	$	600,000		—		—
Award Shares/SSARs At Grant Date		6,000 Shares		5,000 Shares		22,500 SSARs
Dollar Value of Award At Vesting/Exercise (Assuming 8% Compounded Annual Stock Price Increase) (2)	$	755,827	$	629,856	$	584,352
Dollar Value of Award At Vesting/Exercise (Assuming 8% Compounded Annual Stock Price Decrease)	$	476,299	$	396,916		—

(1) Dollar values ~~and share value increase/decrease are used in this table are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended as forecasts of future stock price performance.~~

~~Table~~ of ~~Contents~~


~~(2)~~	~~PRS values at grant and vesting include the participant’s appreciation or loss on the required investment in addition to the value of the granted restricted stock. The values exclude dividends.~~


~~(3)~~	The examples above illustrate value delivered for each ECP grant form over the approximate three-year vesting period. However, SSARs are only taxable when the SSAR is exercised. Participants may choose to hold their SSARs longer than the three-year vesting period (up to the full seven-year contractual term) and continue to participate in future stock price appreciation, if any.

~~2015~~awards are used in this table for illustrative purposes only and are not intended as forecasts of future stock price performance. All values shown are before tax withholding.

(2) PRSU values exclude dividend equivalents.

(3) Participants may choose to hold their SSARs longer than the three-year vesting period (up to the full seven-year contractual term) and continue to participate in future stock price appreciation, if any.

2016 Equity Choice Program Awards

In ~~January 2015,~~February 2016, the Committee approved the ~~2015~~2016 ECP values awarded to each executive, including our NEOs, ~~(other than our CFO),~~ with an effective grant date of May ~~6, 2015.~~2, 2016. The period of time between approval of ECP values and the actual grant date gives ECP participants time to make their irrevocable ECP elections and to arrange for the purchase of ~~PRS~~shares from the Company if soPRSUs are elected. The Committee determined that the ~~2015~~2016 ECP grants would vest on April ~~6, 2018,~~2, 2019, which is slightly less than three years from the grant date, to enable participants to use ~~vested PRS~~ shares vesting in 2019 to acquire new ~~PRS~~ shares in ~~2018, to the extent granted.~~

~~For 2015, similar~~2019 if they elect PRSUs for their 2019 ECP award.

54IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Similar to prior years, the actual amount of each ECP awarded to each NEO in 2016 was based on an evaluation of the NEO’s individual performance, long-term potential, ~~and~~ market factors ~~including~~and retention considerations. ~~As part of her compensation package, Ms. Cornell received an ECP award of $500,000, prorated for her hire date, which will vest in 2018.~~ The actual value of these awards will depend on future stock price performance.

The following table shows the ECP dollar award value approved by the Committee for each NEO during ~~2015~~2016 and the percentage and adjusted dollar value after application of the adjustment factor of each type of award elected by each NEO. None of the NEOs elected SSARs in ~~2015.~~

  2015 Unadjusted
ECP Award
PRS Election RSU Election
Percent Election
  Adjusted
Value
Percent Election
  Adjusted
Value
Adjustment Factor 120 % 100 %
Andreas Fibig
$2,000,000
55 %
$1,320,000
45 %
$900,000
Alison A. Cornell (1)
$250,000
100 %
$300,000
—
—
Nicolas Mirzayantz
$700,000
100 %
$840,000
—
—
Matthias Haeni
$400,000
100 %
$480,000
—
—
Anne Chwat
$500,000
100 %
$600,000
—
—
Richard O’Leary
$250,000
100 %
$300,000
—
—

~~______~~

2016.


			PRSU Election				RSU Election
	2016 Unadjusted ECP Award		Percent Election		Adjusted Value		Percent Election		Adjusted Value
Adjustment Factor						120 %				100%
Andreas Fibig	$	2,000,000		30%	$	720,000		70%	$	1,400,000
Richard O’Leary (1)	$	275,000		100%	$	330,000		—		—
Nicolas Mirzayantz	$	650,000		100%	$	780,000		—		—
Matthias Haeni	$	500,000		100%	$	600,000		—		—
Anne Chwat	$	525,000		100%	$	630,000		—		—
Alison Cornell	$	500,000		50%	$	300,000		50%	$	250,000


(1)	~~Represents prorated amount received by Ms. Cornell~~For 2016, Mr. O’Leary’s ECP award was based on ~~her hire date.~~his position as SVP, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer. Effective for 2017, in connection with his appointment as EVP and CFO, his ECP award will be based on his position as EVP and CFO.

The actual equity award grants to each NEO, based on the above elections, are identified in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. Information on prior ECP awards that were exercised or vested in ~~2015~~2016 can be found in the ~~Options Exercised and~~ Stock Vested Table.

Indirect Compensation

Deferred Compensation Plan

As part of our compensation program, we offer U.S.-based executives and other senior employees an opportunity to participate in our DCP. Pursuant to the terms of the DCP, we provide the same level of matching contributions to our executive officers that are available to other employees under our 401(k) savings plan. We also use the DCP to encourage executives to acquire ~~deferred~~ shares of our common stock that are economically equivalent to ownership of our common stock but on atax-deferred basis. We do this to encourage executives to be long-term owners of a significant equity stake in ~~the~~our Company and to enhance the alignment between the interests of executives and those of our shareholders.

~~Table of Contents~~

Our costs in offering the DCP consist of the time-value of money costs, the cost of the matching contribution that supplements the 401(k) savings plan, administrative costs and a 25% premium for ~~cash~~amounts deferred into the IFF ~~Stock~~Share Fund in an executive’s DCP ~~account~~account. The premium on amounts deferred into the IFF Share Fund typically do not vest until approximately two years after the deferral is made, as the premium is contingent on the executive remaining employed by ~~the Company~~us (other than for retirement) for the full calendar year following the year when such deferral is made. If notional investments within the DCP increase in value, the amount of our payment obligation will increase. The time-value of money cost results from the delay in the time at which we can take tax deductions for compensation payable to a participating executive.

Additional information about the DCP and supplemental matching contributions and premiums on cash deferrals under the DCP made for NEOs may be found below under ~~“2015~~ “2016Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation.”

~~Perquisite Program~~

Our NEO perquisites program offers non-monetary benefits that are competitive and consistent with the marketplace as determined through a market study conducted by our independent compensation consultant. Under the perquisites program, our NEOs are eligible to receive certain benefits including:

~~Company car or car allowance;~~

~~Annual physical exam;~~

~~Financial planning and tax preparation (up to approximately $10,000 per year);~~

~~Estate planning (up to $4,000 over a three-year period); and~~

~~Health club membership (up to $3,000 annually).~~

As part of the terms of his employment, Mr. Haeni is also entitled to certain transitional assistance associated with his tax, housing and retirement savings for a limited period with such benefits declining annually.

~~The Committee believes that the total value of our perquisites program is reasonable. Additional details concerning perquisites are included in the footnotes to the All Other Compensation Table.~~

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 55

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Severance Policy

The ESP provides severance and other benefits to executives, including NEOs, whose employment is terminated ~~not for~~by the Company without cause or in the event of a termination by the executive for good reason in connection with a change in control of the ~~Company~~Company. Additionally, the ESP provides severance and other benefits in the case of NEOs whose employment is terminated by the ~~NEOs (other than Mr. O’Leary),~~Company for good reason not in connection with a change in control. This policy helps us in competing with other companies in recruiting and retaining qualified executives. When recruiting an executive from another company, the executive in most cases will seek contract terms that provide compensation if his or her employment is terminated by us in cases in which the executive has not engaged in misconduct. The level of severance pay under the ESP is based on a tier system and each executive’s assigned tier is based on the executive’s grade level. All of our NEOs are in Tier ~~I other than Mr. O’Leary, who is in Tier II.~~I. The specific severance pay by tier was developed with the assistance of our independent compensation consultant and determined by the Committee. We believe that the ESP provides a level of severance pay and benefits that is within a range of competitive practice of our peer group companies.

A discussion of our ESP and the payments that each of our NEOs would have been eligible to receive had a covered termination occurred as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 is set forth below under “Potential Payments upon Termination ~~and~~or Change in Control.”

~~Executive Death Benefit Plan~~

Additional Benefits

Perquisite Program

Our ~~Executive Death Benefit Plan provides participants, including each~~NEO perquisite program offersnon-monetary benefits that are within the range of market practice as determined through a market study conducted by our independent compensation consultant. Under the perquisite program, our NEOs are generally eligible to receive certain benefits including:

Company car;

Annual physical exam;

Financial planning and tax preparation (up to $10,000 per year);

Estate planning (up to $4,000 over a three-year period); and

Fitness dues or membership (up to $3,000 annually).

We may provide additional or modified perquisites to our NEOs in connection with their employment arrangements. As part of the ~~NEOs (other than~~terms of his employment, Mr. ~~O’Leary),~~Haeni is also entitled to certain transitional assistance associated with his tax, housing and retirement savings for a ~~pre-retirement death benefit equal to twice~~limited period with such benefits declining annually. In addition, Mr. Fibig is provided a Company car and a Company driver, and an annual financial planning and tax preparation allowance of $25,000.

In August 2016, the ~~participant’s annual base salary less $50,000 (the death benefit provided by~~Committee reviewed our ~~basic group term life insurance plan for employees~~perquisite program with its independent compensation consultant and ~~retirees). The plan also provides a death benefit post-retirement, or pre-retirement after attaining age 70, equal~~determined that the total value of our perquisite program is within the range of market practice. Additional details concerning perquisites are included in the footnotes to the participant’s base salary for the year in which the participant retires or reaches the age of 70, assuming the participant was an executive officer, less $12,500 of group coverage for retired participants and less $50,000 for senior participants (those who have attained the age of 70 and remain employed with the Company).

All Other Compensation Table.

56IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

~~Table of Contents~~

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Supplemental Long Term Disability

We offer our U.S.-based employees Long Term Disability (“LTD”) coverage at Company expense, which provides a benefit, calculated as a percentage of base salary, in the case of full disability. Under our group plan, the maximum base salary is $300,000, and the maximum monthly benefit is $15,000. We also offer Supplemental LTD insurance to provide a maximum monthly benefit of $25,000 for U.S.-based employees, including our NEOs, who earn a base salary plus bonus in excess of the maximum base salary of $300,000 under our group plan. The Supplemental LTD insurance premium, like our basic group LTD policy, is fully paid by ~~the Company~~us and is taxable income to employees upon receipt of the benefit.

Executive Death Benefit Plan

Our Executive Death Benefit Plan provides participants, including each of the NEOs, with apre-retirement death benefit equal to twice the participant’s annual base salary less $50,000 (the death benefit provided by our basic group term life insurance plan for employees and retirees). The plan also provides a death benefit post-retirement, orpre-retirement after attaining age 70, equal to the participant’s base salary for the year in which the participant retires or reaches the age of 70, assuming the participant was an executive officer, less $12,500 of group coverage for retired participants and less $50,000 for senior participants (those who have attained the age of 70 and remain employed with us).

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 57

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Compensation Setting Process

Roles and Responsibilities



Compensation Committee				The Committee is responsible for overseeing the determination, implementation and administration of executive compensation (including equity awards, benefits and perquisites). The Committee recommends CEO compensation to the independent directors of the Board for their approval and approves the compensation of all the other NEOs.

Compensation Consultant				Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) is engaged as the Committee’s independent compensation consultant. Since August 2015, FW Cook has worked with the Committee to provide it with analyses, advice, guidance and recommendations on executive compensation levels versus peers, market trends and incentive plan designs. FW Cook is engaged exclusively by the Committee on executive andnon-employee director compensation matters and does not have other consulting arrangements with us. The Committee considers the independence of FW Cook on an annual basis, and in 2016 it determined FW Cook was independent and that no conflicts of interest existed.

Management				Our CEO and CHRO evaluate the individual performance and, with input from the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the competitive pay positioning for senior management members that report directly to the CEO, including our NEOs, and make recommendations to the Committee concerning each such executive’s target compensation. Our CEO follows the same process with regard to the target compensation for our CHRO, without her input, and the Committee follows the same process with regard to the target compensation for our CEO, without his input.

Shareholder Advisory Vote

As part of its compensation setting process, the Committee also considers the results of the prior year’s shareholder advisory vote on our executive compensation. The Committee believes these voting results provide useful insight as to whether shareholders agree that the Committee is achieving its goal of designing and administering an executive compensation program that promotes the best interests of our Company and our shareholders by providing its executives with appropriate compensation and meaningful incentives to deliver strong financial performance and increase shareholder value. As part of its 2016 compensation setting process, the Committee reviewed the results of the 2015 shareholder advisory vote, in which 94.6% of the votes cast were voted in favor of our executive compensation program.

58IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Peer Group and Benchmarking

Market Benchmarking

The Committee reviews its external market benchmarking and peer group data annually. The Committee’s goals are to position (1) target total cash compensation at median or slightly above and (2) target total direct compensation (salary, annual incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation) between the median to 75th percentile of relevant market benchmarks. This philosophy reflects the Committee’s approach to setting stretch goals that require above median performance to generate target payouts. In August 2015, the Committee reviewed peer group data with our independent compensation consultant for purposes of determining the appropriate peer group for setting 2016 compensation levels and opportunities.

The Committee’s independent compensation consultant provides the 25th percentile, median and 75th percentile “market reference” data for each executive position based on the average of the two relevant compensation benchmarks, as further explained below under “Peer Groups—CEO, CFO and Group Presidents”. This data is used to analyze the external competitiveness of each NEO’s base salary, target total cash compensation and target total direct compensation. This analysis is reviewed with the Committee and, in the case of the compensation of NEOs other than the CEO, with the CEO as well. In determining target total direct compensation for each executive in 2016, the Committee considered the consultant’s market reference analysis. In addition, the Committee considered a number of other important factors, including each executive’s:

individual experience and performance;

scope of responsibilities;

relative responsibilities compared with other senior Company executives;

contribution relative to overall Company performance;

compensation relative to his or her peers within the organization; and

long-term potential.

For 2016, the Committee awarded target total direct compensation to Messrs. Fibig, Haeni, Mirzayantz and Mmes. Chwat and Cornell, and to Mr. O’Leary following his promotion, that was generally within the competitive range of the targeted median to 75th percentile. The total actual compensation paid for the year, as compared to target compensation approved at the beginning of the year, may differ depending on Company and individual performance. Consequently, the actual compensation received by a NEO may be higher or lower than his or her market reference range.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 59

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Peer Groups—CEO, CFO and Group Presidents

For 2016 compensation decisions regarding (1) the CEO, (2) the current and former CFO (which was evaluated at the beginning of the year prior to her departure) and (3) each of the Group Presidents, the Committee benchmarked compensation against the average of the following two groups:


Peer Group	Selection Criteria	Ø U.S. publicly traded companies of comparable size with manufacturing operations (generally based on revenue of $1B- $7B and market capitalization of $1B - $14B) Ø Strongin-house R&D activities Ø Global scope with significant international presence (international operations generally accounting for at least 25% of total revenues) Ø Growth orientation, with positive sales and earnings growth over the three years prior to the review and selection of the peer group Ø Companies with which we compete for executive talent Ø Progressive companies with positive reputations
	Component Companies	Ø Church & Dwight Co, Inc. Ø The Clorox Company Ø Coty, Inc. Ø Edgewell Personal Care Ø Elizabeth Arden, Inc. Ø The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. Ø Herbalife Ltd. Ø The Hershey Company	Ø Hormel Foods Corporation Ø Jarden Corporation Ø McCormick & Company, Inc. Ø Newell Rubbermaid Inc. Ø Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. Ø Revlon, Inc. Ø Sensient Technologies Corporation Ø Tupperware Brands Corporation
	Position in Group	Ø Approximately the 38th percentile of revenue and 51^st percentile of market capitalization
Size- Appropriate Cut of the Towers Watson General Industry Survey	Selection Criteria	Ø 126 companies Ø $1 billion to $7 billion in reported revenues Ø Revenues interpolated to our 2015 trailing four-quarter revenue size: • $3.1 billion for corporate positions • $1.6 billion for Fragrances • $1.5 billion for Flavors

There were six companies in the Peer Group that did not meet all of the desired criteria-Clorox, Elizabeth Arden, Estee Lauder, Hershey, Hormel Foods and Jarden. Each of Clorox, Estee Lauder, Hershey, Hormel Foods and Jarden were slightly above either the revenue or market capitalization criteria, while Elizabeth Arden was slightly below the revenue and market capitalization criteria. The Committee decided to keep these companies in the Peer Group (1) based on the significant comparability of these businesses to one of our two business units and (2) to allow for year-over-year consistency in the peer group.

Changes to 2017 Peer Group

In August 2016, the Committee reviewed its Peer Group with FW Cook for purposes of its upcoming 2017 target compensation setting process and determined that, for 2017, Elizabeth Arden, Hormel Foods, Jarden Corporation and Newell Brands (formerly Newell Rubbermaid) would be removed from the Peer Group.

60IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Elizabeth Arden was removed because it entered into an agreement to be acquired by Revlon in June 2016. Hormel was removed because of differences in revenue size as well as relatively low comparability in terms of R&D focus and multinational presence compared to us. Jarden and Newell were removed because of their 2016 merger which resulted in a post-merger revenue size that was above the desired range.

The Committee also added four companies to the Peer Group for 2017. The Committee added Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., Hain Celestial Group and Mead Johnson Nutrition because they primarily manufacture and distribute food/beverage products and fall within desired revenue and market capitalization size ranges. In addition, the Committee added Spectrum Brands Holdings because it manufactures and distributes a range of consumer products and falls within the desired size range.

Peer Group—Other Executive Officers

Based on recommendations by its independent compensation consultant, the Committee determined that the Peer Group did not publicly disclose comparative data for the other executive officer positions that were reviewed by the Committee. Consequently, for all other executive officer positions, including the General Counsel, instead of using the Peer Group, the Committee used the aggregate data available from a select cut of the Towers Watson General Industry Survey that (1) identified themselves as belonging to the consumer products or the food and beverage industry and (2) had revenues between $1 billion and $7 billion (the “Consumer Products Select Cut”). The Committee averaged (1) the Consumer Products Select Cut and (2) the Towers Watson General Industry Survey to obtain the 25th percentile, median and 75th percentile target compensation for market reference data.

The companies included in the Consumer Products Select Cut in 2016 were as follows:

Consumer Products Select Cut

Selection Criteria

Ø 22 companies (including three companies that are also part of the 2016 Peer Group)

Ø $1 billion to $7 billion in reported revenues, with median revenues of $3.8 billion

Component Companies

Ø Ansell Limited

Ø Bemis Company, Inc.

Ø Bob Evans Farms, Inc.

Ø Cott Corporation

Ø Dole Food Company

Ø Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.

Ø Flowers Foods, Inc.

Ø Hanesbrands Inc.

Ø Hasbro, Inc.

Ø The J.M. Smucker Company

Ø Jack In The Box Inc.

Ø Kerry Group plc

Ø Keurig Green Mountain, Inc.

Ø Molson Coors Brewing Company

Ø Nu Skin Enterprises

Ø Parmalat S.p.A

Ø Quad/Graphics, Inc.

Ø Revlon, Inc.

Ø The ScottsMiracle-Gro Company

Ø Tempur Sealy International, Inc.

Ø Tupperware Brands Corporation

Ø The WhiteWave Foods Company

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 61

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Clawback Policy

The triggers for recovery of compensation under our compensation recoupment and clawback policies ~~include~~ include:

accounting ~~restatements,~~ restatements;

financial ~~restatements and~~ misstatements (without regard to fault), ;

an employee’s willful ~~misconduct or~~ misconduct;

violation of a Company policy that is materially detrimental to ~~the Company and~~ our Company; or

an ~~employee's~~employee’s violation ofnon-competition,non-solicitation, confidentiality and similar covenants.

All compensation under our 2010 Stock Award and Incentive Plan and our 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, including AIP, LTIP, ECP and other cash and equity awards, ~~is subject to clawback,~~ as well as payments made under our ~~ESP.~~

ESP, are subject to clawback.

Tax Deductibility

We generally attempt to structure executive compensation to be tax deductible. However, the Committee also believes that under some circumstances, such as to attract or to retain key executives, to recognize outstanding performance or to take into account the external business environment, it may be important to compensate one or more key executives above tax deductible limits.

~~2016~~

2017 Compensation Actions

In ~~December 2015,~~November 2016, the Compensation Committee approved ~~a change~~changes to our ~~LTIP program~~AIP applicable to our NEOs effective ~~with~~for the ~~2016-2018 grant cycle. Going forward,~~2017 fiscal year, including (i) that in order to fund any payouts under the ~~TSR~~AIP, the new corporate operating profit threshold must be met and (ii) eliminating the 10% individual performance component ~~will be eliminated~~ for NEOs, and correspondingly increasing by 5% the weighting of each of the ~~three annual performance segments,~~currency sales growth component and operating profit component. In the ~~three-year TSR~~event the Company does not achieve the corporate operating profit threshold, no AIP payouts will ~~continue~~be awarded to ~~be used as~~ the ~~sole measure of Company performance for~~participants, including the ~~three-year cumulative performance segment. The three-year TSR will continue to have a 62.5% overall weighting for each award consistent with prior years.~~

NEOs.

Non-GAAP Reconciliation

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis includes the followingnon-GAAP financial measures: ~~local~~ currency neutral sales, adjusted operating profit and adjusted earnings per share. Please see Exhibit A of this proxy statement for a reconciliation of such metrics.

62IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

~~Table of Contents~~

~~COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT~~

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement. Based on those reviews and discussions, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated by reference into ~~the Company’s~~our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~



	~~Compensation Committee~~

	~~Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. (Chair)~~

	~~Marcello V. Bottoli~~ ~~Michael Ducker~~ ~~Christina Gold~~

2016.

Compensation Committee

Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. (Chair)

Michael Ducker

Christina Gold

Katherine M. Hudson

Dale F. Morrison

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 63

~~Table of Contents~~

~~VIII. PROPOSAL III — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (known as the ~~“Dodd- Frank~~“Dodd-Frank Act”) requires us to provide our shareholders with the opportunity to approve, on a nonbinding, advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, often referred to as “Say on Pay.”

As discussed in detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the compensation tables and narratives that follow, the compensation program for our NEOs is designed (i) to attract, retain and motivate our executives who are critical to our success, (ii) to reward achievement

The core of both annual and long-term performance goals and (iii) to align the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders. Pursuant to our compensation program, an average of 76% of our NEOs’ 2015 target total direct compensation is considered “variable” and tied to our Company’s performance based on a number of financial goals and Company stock price performance and dividend return (TSR).

~~We believe that~~ our executive compensation ~~program strikes the appropriate balance between utilizing responsible, measured pay practices and rewarding the~~philosophy is that our executives’ compensation should be linked to achievement of financial and ~~operational~~operating performance metrics that build shareholder ~~value. This balance~~ value over both the short- and long-term. We have designed our compensation program to focus on elements that we believe will contribute to these shareholder value drivers. As such, our compensation program:

includes a significant equity component,

is ~~evidenced by~~variable and tied to value-creating performance metrics,

reflects each executive’s level of responsibility, and

rewards individual performance and contributions.

In 2016, approximately 93% of the ~~following:~~

~~Our AIP rewards the achievement of~~votes cast on our annual performance objectives by providing awards based on the attainment of (1) four financial performance metrics: (i) local currency sales growth, (ii) operating profit, (iii) gross margin and (iv) working capital and (2) individual objectivessay-on-pay proposal relating to ~~leadership, succession, planning and people development.~~

~~Our LTIP rewards solid Company performance by providing awards based~~2015 executive compensation voted for the proposal. In deciding how to cast your vote on ~~(i) EP and (ii) TSR performance relative to~~this proposal, the ~~S&P 500. In addition,~~Board requests that you consider the ~~LTIP aligns our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders by paying 50%~~structure of the ~~earned award in shares of our common stock.~~

~~Our ECP incentivizes our executives to create value for our shareholders by providing equity-based compensation and encouraging direct investment by our executives.~~

We require our NEOs to meet certain stock ownership guidelines under our Share Retention Policy to promote alignment of our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders and to discourage excessive risk taking for short-term gains.

~~For additional information on the~~Company’s executive compensation program, ~~for our NEOs, including specific information about compensation in 2015, please see the information~~which is more fully discussed in this proxy statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion and ~~Analysis,~~Analysis.” ~~along with~~

This vote isnon-binding; however, we value the ~~compensation tables and narrative descriptions that follow.~~

~~We provide~~opinions of our shareholders ~~with~~and accordingly the opportunity to cast the Say on Pay vote on an annual basis. In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act, the Say on Pay vote will be an advisory vote regarding our Company’s NEO compensation program generallyBoard and ~~does not examine any particular compensation element individually. Because the Say on Pay vote is advisory, it is not binding on our Company, our Compensation Committee or our Board. However,~~ the Compensation Committee ~~intends to review~~will consider the ~~results~~outcome of ~~the~~this advisory vote ~~and will be cognizant of~~in connection with future executive compensation decisions.

For reasons set forth above, the ~~feedback received from the voting results as it completes its annual review and engages in~~Board recommends that you vote for the compensation ~~planning process.~~

paid to the NEOs in 2016.

Accordingly, we will ask our shareholders to vote on the following resolution at the ~~2016~~2017 Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that, the compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs in 2016, as disclosed in this proxy statement for our ~~2016~~2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related narrative disclosure, is hereby approved.”

YOUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”

THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NEOS IN 2016

Proposal 3 — Advisory Vote On Executive Compensation

64IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

LOGO

The ~~Board of Directors believes~~Dodd-Frank Act requires us to provide our shareholders with the opportunity to vote, on an advisory,non-binding basis, for their preference as to whether votes on the compensation of our NEOs ~~is appropriate and promotes~~should occur every one, two or three years.

At our 2011 annual meeting, our shareholders voted to hold an annual advisory vote on our executive compensation program. Accordingly, we have submitted Say on Pay proposals on the ~~best interests~~compensation of our ~~shareholders and therefore~~NEOs at every subsequent annual meeting.

We are required to hold a vote on the frequency of Say on Pay proposals every six years. As a result, we are again asking you to vote on whether you would prefer an advisory vote every one, two or three years or you may abstain.

After careful consideration, our Board recommends that ~~shareholders~~we continue to conduct an annual advisory vote ~~FOR approval~~on executive compensation.

When voting on this proposal, you may indicate whether you would prefer an advisory vote every one, two or three years, or you may abstain from voting.

If a majority of ~~this resolution.~~

the votes cast do not favor one of the three frequencies, the frequency that receives the most votes will be considered to be the frequency favored by shareholders.

YOUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR AN ANNUAL ADVISORY

VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Proposal 4 — Advisory Vote on Frequency of Votes on Executive Compensation

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 65

~~Table of Contents~~

~~IX. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation for:

our current CEO;

our current CFO and former ~~interim~~ CFO; and

our three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

We refer to the executive officers included in the Summary Compensation Table as our NEOs. A detailed description of the plans and programs under which our NEOs received the following compensation can be found in this proxy statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Name and
Principal Position
Year
Salary
($)(1)

Bonus
($)

Stock
Awards
($)(2)(3)

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(4)(5)

Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(6)

All Other
Compensation
($)(7)

Total
($)
Andreas Fibig 2015 1,200,000
—
3,173,165
1,702,478
—
133,099
6,208,742
Chairman and CEO 2014 400,000
1,000,000
2,244,414
760,534
—
134,027
4,538,975

Alison A. Cornell (8) 2015 271,562
250,000
506,228
217,787
—
32,996
1,278,573
CFO

Richard O’Leary (9) 2015 445,311
—
541,687
200,542
—
78,053
1,265,593
Former Interim CFO 2014 302,872
—
349,635
225,148
—
86,897
964,552

Nicolas Mirzayantz 2015 585,000
—
1,088,973
506,351
—
169,083
2,349,407
Group President, Fragrances 2014 532,500
—
2,998,513
762,039
303,665
163,172
4,759,889
2013 510,000
—
946,526
1,000,974
(96,591 ) 122,110
2,483,019

Matthias Haeni 2015 490,000
—
729,004
375,043
—
782,736
2,376,783
Group President, Flavors 2014 445,653
—
624,912
407,888
—
485,920
1,964,373

Anne Chwat 2015 465,000
—
738,915
308,330
—
155,487
1,667,732
General Counsel 2014 465,000
—
708,594
419,022
—
562,425
2,155,041
2013 461,250
—
650,471
606,067
—
144,650
1,862,438

~~_______________________~~


Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)(1)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)(2)(3)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4)(5)		Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(6)		All Other Compensation ($)(7)		Total ($)
Andreas Fibig		2016		1,275,000		—		2,963,837		1,670,801		—		300,595		6,210,233
Chairman and CEO		2015		1,200,000		—		3,173,165		1,702,478		—		133,099		6,208,742
		2014		400,000		1,000,000		2,244,414		760,534		—		134,027		4,538,975


Richard O’Leary		2016		422,131		—		1,346,578		227,620		—		112,537		2,108,866
CFO		2015		445,311		—		541,687		200,542		—		78,053		1,265,593
		2014		302,872		—		349,635		225,148		—		86,897		964,552


Nicolas Mirzayantz		2016		600,000		—		1,010,428		452,834		43,291		153,913		2,260,466
Group President, Fragrances		2015		585,000		—		1,088,973		506,351		—		169,083		2,349,407
Group President, Fragrances		2014		532,500		—		2,998,513		762,039		303,665		163,172		4,759,889


Matthias Haeni		2016		518,750		—		830,353		492,074		—		1,537,189		3,378,366
Group President, Flavors		2015		490,000		—		729,004		375,043		—		782,736		2,376,783
Group President, Flavors		2014		445,653		—		624,912		407,888		—		485,920		1,964,373


Anne Chwat		2016		472,500		—		761,326		293,960		—		183,826		1,711,612
General Counsel		2015		465,000		—		738,915		308,330		—		155,487		1,667,732
		2014		465,000		—		708,594		419,022		—		562,425		2,155,041


Alison A. Cornell		2016		436,067		—		766,479		340,537		—		1,461,973		3,005,056
Former CFO		2015		271,562		250,000		506,228		217,787		—		32,996		1,278,573

(1)

The ~~2015~~2016 amounts in this column include (i) the following amounts deferred under the DCP: Mr. Fibig -- $318,750; Mr. O’Leary -- $33,767; Mr. Mirzayantz — $30,000; Ms. Chwat — $236,250; and Ms. Cornell ~~-- $81,667; Mr. Mirzayantz - $58,500; and Ms. Chwat - $139,500,~~— $152,277, and (ii) the following amounts deferred under the Retirement Investment Fund Plan (401(k)): Mr. Fibig -— $24,000; Mr. O’Leary — $24,000; Mr. Mirzayantz — $24,000; Ms. ~~Cornell - $3,000; Mr. O’Leary - $22,839; Mr. Mirzayantz - $24,000;~~Chwat — $18,900; and Ms. ~~Chwat -~~Cornell -- $24,000.

(2)

The amounts in the Stock Awards ~~and Option Awards columns~~column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted during each respective fiscal year, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Details on and assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of RSUs, ~~PRS,~~PRSUs, SSARs ~~options~~ and LTIP equity incentive compensation may be found in Note 12 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. The grant date fair value attributable to the ~~2015-2017~~2016-2018 LTIP cycle

Executive Compensation

66IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

awards ~~included in the Stock Awards column~~ pertains to the 50% portion of those awards that will be payable in our common stock if the performance conditions are satisfied and is based on the probable outcome of such conditions. The value of these awards at the grant date if the maximum level of performance conditions were to be achieved is as follows: Mr. Fibig ~~- $2,035,200;~~— $1,843,716; Ms. Cornell -- ~~$421,541;~~$460,929; Mr. O’Leary ~~- $198,835;~~— $184,372; Mr. Mirzayantz ~~- $508,800;~~— $460,929; Mr. Haeni ~~- $508,800;~~— $460,929; and Ms. Chwat ~~- $283,910.~~— $262,730. The actual number of shares earned by the NEOs for the completed ~~2013-2015 LTIP cycle, for the 2015 segment of the~~ 2014-2016 LTIP cycle and for the ~~2015~~2016 segment of each of the 2015-2017 LTIP cycle and 2016-2018 LTIP cycle can be found in the narrative following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table under the heading “Long-Term Incentive Plan.”

~~Table of Contents~~

(3)

The grant date fair value attributable to PRS awards included in the Stock Awards column pertains to the value of the matching portion of the award. Not reflected in this column is the value of shares delivered or cash paid by NEOs to purchase shares in fiscal year ~~2015~~2016 for the participant’s portion of the PRS award. As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, participants in our ECP are permitted to satisfy the purchase price of PRS shares by tendering shares of our common stock or paying cash. The following NEOs purchased or tendered the number of shares indicated in fiscal year ~~2015,~~2016, in each case at a price per share equal to the closing stock price on the date of grant: Mr. Fibig ~~- $1,319,886~~— $719,938 for ~~11,176 shares; Ms. Cornell - $299,894 for 2,608~~6,009 shares; Mr. O’Leary ~~- $299,974~~— $329,957 for ~~2,540~~2,754 shares; Mr. Mirzayantz ~~- $839,927~~— $779,963 for ~~7,112~~6,510 shares; Mr. Haeni ~~- $479,958~~— $599,889 for ~~4,064~~5,007 shares; Ms. Chwat — $629,961 for 5,258 shares; and Ms. ~~Chwat - $599,948~~Cornell — $300,004 for ~~5,080~~2,503 shares.


(4)	The ~~2015~~2016 amounts in this column include the following amounts earned under the ~~2015~~2016 AIP: Mr. Fibig - ~~$607,680; Ms. Cornell - $91,679;~~$1,134,120; Mr. O’Leary - ~~$93,094;~~$177,579; Mr. Mirzayantz ~~- $194,320;~~— $297,600; Mr. Haeni - ~~$192,800;~~$336,840; Ms. Chwat — $207,195; and Ms. ~~Chwat - $117,738.~~Cornell — $253,616.

(5)

LTIP cycles have four performance segments related to each year in the three-year LTIP cycle and the cumulative results for the full three-year cycle. Any amounts earned under a performance segment are credited on behalf of the executive at the end of the relevant segment, but such credited amounts are not paid until the completion of the three-year LTIP cycle. Upon completion,one-half of any award earned for a completed LTIP cycle is paid in cash and the remaining half is paid in shares of our common stock. The cash portion of the NEOs’ credited awards is reported in this column for the year in which such amount was earned, rather than in the year in which such award is actually paid. The amounts in this column related to ~~2015~~2016 include the amounts earned and credited for the ~~2015~~2016 segment of the ~~2014-2016~~2015-2017 and ~~2015-2017~~2016-2018 LTIP cycles and the following amounts earned for the ~~2015~~2016 and cumulative segments under the completed ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 LTIP cycle: Mr. Fibig - ~~$509,798; Ms. Cornell - $55,192;~~$392,869; Mr. O’Leary ~~- $56,876;~~— $35,881; Mr. Mirzayantz - ~~$175,781;~~$119,281; Mr. Haeni ~~- $65,992;~~— $119,281; Ms. Chwat — $66,559; and Ms. ~~Chwat - $108,984.~~Cornell — $58,925.

(6)

The amounts in this column represent the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of the NEO’s accumulated benefit under our U.S. Pension Plan (our qualified defined benefit plan) and our Supplemental Retirement Plan (ournon-qualified defined benefit plan). Earnings in the interest bearing account in the DCP were not above-market, and earnings in other investment choices under the DCP were not preferential, and therefore are not included.


(7)	Details of the ~~2015~~2016 amounts set forth in this column are included in the All Other Compensation Table.

~~(8)~~

Ms. Cornell was appointed CFO effective July 8, 2015. The amounts in the Salary and Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation columns represent prorated amounts based on her partial year of service. The amount in the Bonus column represents the cash bonus paid to Ms. Cornell in connection with her hiring, as further described above in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Compensation Setting Process - New Executive Officer Compensation."


~~(9)~~	~~The amount in the Salary column includes $50,055 of deferred salary that was received three months following the appointment of our new CFO.~~

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 67

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

~~Table of Contents~~

~~2015~~2016 All Other Compensation

Dividends
on Stock
Awards
($)(1)

Company
Contributions
to
Savings and
Defined
Contribution
Plans($)(2)

Auto
($)(3)

Financial/
Estate
Planning,
Tax
Preparation
and Legal
Services($)

Executive
Death
Benefit
Program
($)(4)

Matching
Charitable
Contributions($)

Relocation
Expenses
($(5)

Tax
Equalization
/ Assistance
($)(6)
Other ($)(7)
Total
($)
Andreas Fibig 17,502
18,550
61,472
15,222
9,105
—
1,800
120
8,237
133,098
Alison A. Cornell 1,460
3,000
15,698
5,450
2,738
—
—
—
4,650
32,996
Richard O’Leary 21,628
18,550
11,803
7,500
11,681
2,500
—
—
4,391
78,053
Nicolas Mirzayantz 60,025
55,751
16,010
10,055
12,455
3,500
—
—
11,287
169,083
Matthias Haeni 19,812
90,305(8)
6,746
—
3,900
—
145,458(8)
507,559(8)
8,957
782,736
Anne Chwat 42,156
59,527
15,462
9,836
11,290
10,000
—
—
7,216
155,487
~~______________________~~


	Dividends on Stock Awards ($)(1)		Company Contributions to Savings and Defined Contribution Plans ($)(2)			Auto ($)(3)		Financial/ Estate Planning, Tax Preparation and Legal Services ($)		Executive Death Benefit Program ($)(4)		Matching Charitable Contributions ($)		Relocation Expenses ($)(5)			Tax Equalization/ Assistance ($)(6)			Severance ($)(7)		Other ($)(8)		Total ($)
Andreas Fibig		24,155		199,906			60,270		9,225		—		—		—			—			—		7,039		300,595
Richard O’Leary		25,857		48,525			13,350		7,500		11,714		—		—			—			—		5,591		112,537
Nicolas Mirzayantz		58,390		49,746			6,947		9,225		12,688		5,000		—			—			—		11,917		153,913
Matthias Haeni		24,947		82,249	(9)		16,954		—		4,353		—		107,899	(9)		1,296,480	(9)		—		4,307		1,537,189
Anne Chwat		39,459		83,734			14,158		14,000		10,436		10,000		—			—			—		12,039		183,826
Alison A. Cornell		6,192		49,859			25,025		9,879		2,738		—		—			—			1,364,160		4,120		1,461,973


(1)	The amounts in this column represent ~~dividends~~dividend equivalents paid during ~~2015~~2016 on shares of ~~PRS.~~PRS and PRSUs.

(2)

The amounts in this column represent: (i) matching amounts paid under our Retirement Investment Fund Plan (401(k)); (ii) amounts matched or set aside by our Company under our DCP (which are matching contributions that would otherwise be made under our 401(k) plan but for limitations under U.S. tax law); (iii) the dollar value of premium shares credited to the accounts of participants in the DCP who elect to defer their cash compensation into the IFF Stock Fund; and (iv), for Mr. Haeni, ~~$35,663~~$23,344 contributed to his European retirement plan in lieu of participation in the ~~Company's~~Company’s savings plans and an additional savings allowance of ~~$54,642.~~$58,905. The premium shares may be forfeited if the executive does not remain employed by our Company for the full calendar year following the year during which such shares are credited. Dividend equivalents are credited on shares (including premium shares) held in accounts of participants who defer into the IFF Stock Fund. Dividend equivalents are included in the Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year column of theNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table and are not included in the amounts represented in this column.

(3)

The amounts in this column represent the personal use of automobiles provided by our Company. The value of such use was determined by using standard IRS vehicle value tables and multiplying that value by the percent of personal use. The value of fuel was determined by multiplying the overall fuel cost by the percent of personal use. In both cases personal use percentages were determined on a mileage basis. The amounts in this column also include the cost paid by us for ~~a parking garage and for~~ use of our Company driver.


(4)	The amounts in this column represent costs for the corporate-owned life insurance coverage we have purchased to offset liabilities that may be incurred under our Executive Death Benefit Program. No participant in this program has or will have any direct interest in the cash surrender value of the underlying insurance policy.


(5)	The amounts in this column represent ~~(i)~~a credit of $101 for ~~Mr. Fibig, expenses paid in connection with his relocation and (ii) for Mr. Haeni, $1,458 of~~ relocation expenses and an additional ~~$144,000~~$108,000 of living allowance.

(6)

The amounts in this column represent ~~(i) for Mr. Fibig, the tax gross up o $1,210 on his relocation expenses, and (ii)~~ for Mr. Haeni, a tax gross up ~~of $1,220~~credit on his relocation expenses, a tax equalization payment of $96,623, and a tax gross up of ~~$409,716~~$290,872 on the tax equalization payment. These tax gross up and tax equalization payments will continue through 2017 and then terminate.

(7)	Represents cash severance to be paid to Ms. Cornell under the ESP following her separation from the Company in October 2016.

~~(7)~~(8)

The amounts in this column represent (i) health club membership, (ii) annual physical examination, ~~and~~ (iii) amounts paid under our Supplemental Long-Term Disability ~~Plan.~~Plan and (iv) visa/immigration related expenses.

(9)
~~(8)~~	In connection with his relocation to the United States, we agreed to provide Mr. Haeni an alternate savings program and certain transitional assistance for the four years following his relocation. In lieu of his

68IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

participation in our 401(k) plan and DCP, the Company ~~will provide~~provided Mr. Haeni an annual savings allowance equal to 11% of his annual base salary as an employer contribution to the Swiss pension plan of his choosing. In addition, the Company ~~will provide~~provided (i) a monthly living allowance during ~~2015~~2016 of ~~$12,000, decreasing by $3,000 annually for each subsequent year through~~$9,000, which will decrease to $6,000 in 2017, (ii) tax equalization payments ~~(which will be subject~~(subject togross-up) during ~~2015~~2016 equal to ~~75%~~50% of the difference in income taxation between Singapore and New York City, ~~decreasing~~which will decrease by 25% ~~for each subsequent year through~~in 2017, and (iii) an additional savings allowance during ~~2015~~2016 equal to ~~75%~~50% of the difference between the annual savings allowance and his previous pension payments, ~~decreasing~~which will decrease by 25% ~~for each subsequent year through~~in 2017. These payouts will terminate after 2017.

~~Table of Contents~~

Employment Agreements or Arrangements

Mr. Fibig

Pursuant to the terms of a letter agreement dated May 26, 2014 between our Company and Mr. Fibig, he became our CEO effective September 1, 2014 and Chairman of the Board as of December 1, 2014.

Under this agreement, Mr. Fibig’s employment is on anat-will basis until terminated by either party. Mr. Fibig is entitled to the following compensation under the agreement:

Minimum annual base salary of $1,300,000 in 2016;

A target AIP bonus of 120% of his base salary and a potential maximum annual bonus of 240% of his base salary;

An LTIP target of $2,000,000 and a maximum of up to 200% of the LTIP target; and

Participation in the ECP program.

The letter agreement provides fornon-competition,non-solicitation,non-disclosure, cooperation andnon-disparagement covenants.

Mr. Fibig’s letter agreement grants him certain rights upon termination of his employment. These rights are described in this proxy statement under the heading “Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements - Other Separation Arrangements.”

Other NEOs

The compensation of our other NEOs is approved by the Compensation Committee and is generally determined by the terms of the various compensation plans in which they are participants and which are described in this proxy statement more fully above in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, in the narrative following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table and under the heading “Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements.” In addition, their salary is reviewed, determined and approved on an annual basis by our Compensation Committee. Executives also may be entitled to certain compensation arrangements provided or negotiated in connection with their commencement of employment with our Company.

In connection with Mr. O’Leary’s appointment as EVP and CFO on October 11, 2016, the Compensation Committee approved changes in Mr. O’Leary’s compensation. As CFO, Mr. O’Leary receives a base salary of $500,000 and continues to be eligible to participate in our AIP, with a target AIP bonus of 80% of his base salary, and our LTIP, with a target annual LTIP value of $500,000 commencing in 2017. In addition, he continues to participate in our ECP program with a target award of $500,000 for 2017. The Compensation Committee also approved a special retention restricted stock unit grant to Mr. O’Leary with a value of $1 million that vests on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 69

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2016 Grants ofPlan-Based Awards

The following table provides information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our NEOs during ~~2015.~~2016. The amounts reported in the table under “Estimated Future Payouts underNon-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” and “Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards” represent the threshold, target and maximum awards under our AIP and LTIP programs. The performance conditions applicable to the AIP and LTIP are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

With regard to the AIP, the percentage of each NEO’s target award that was actually achieved for ~~2015~~2016 based on satisfaction of the AIP performance conditions is discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The amount actually paid to each NEO in ~~2016~~2017 based on ~~2015~~2016 performance under the AIP is included in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.

With regard to the LTIP, the amounts of each NEO’s award that were actually achieved for ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 based on satisfaction of the performance conditions for the ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 LTIP and the ~~2015~~2016 segment of each of the ~~2014-2016~~2015-2017 LTIP and ~~2015-2017~~2016-2018 LTIP cycles are set forth following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. In addition, cash amounts earned by each NEO for the cumulative and ~~2015~~2016 segment of the ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 LTIP cycle and the ~~2015~~2016 segments of the ~~2014-2016~~2015-2017 LTIP and ~~2015-2017~~2016-2018 LTIP cycles are also included in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. However, any cash or shares credited to a NEO based on achievement of performance conditions during a segment will not be paid until completion of the full LTIP cycle and could be forfeited if a NEO leaves the Company prior to the payment date.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards~~

Name
Type of
Award (1)
Grant Date (2)
Date of
Compensation
Committee
Approval

Estimated Future
Payouts Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (3)

Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (4)

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(5)

Grant
Date
Fair Value
of
Stock
Awards
($)(6)

Threshold
($)

Target
($)

Maximum
($)

Threshold
($)

Target
($)

Maximum
($)

Andreas Fibig AIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 360,000 1,440,000
2,880,000

2015 LTIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 250,000 1,000,000
2,000,000
250,000
1,000,000
2,000,000
996,182
PRS 5/6/2015 2/9/2015 11,176
1,319,886
RSU 5/6/2015 2/9/2015 7,620
857,098

Alison A. Cornell AIP 7/8/2015 5/19/2015 54,312 217,249
434,498

2015 LTIP 7/8/2015 5/19/2015 51,781 207,125
414,250
51,781
207,125
414,250
206,334
PRSU 8/17/2015 5/19/2015 2,608
299,894

Richard O’Leary AIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 55,151 220,603
441,205

2015 LTIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 24,425 97,698
195,396
24,425
97,698
195,396
97,325
RSU 1/2/2015 11/20/2014 1,487(7)
144,388
PRS 5/6/2015 2/9/2015 2,540
299,974

Nicolas Mirzayantz AIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 120,000 480,000
960,000

2015 LTIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 62,500 250,000
500,000
62,500
250,000
500,000
249,046
PRS 5/6/2015 2/9/2015 7,112
839,927

Matthias Haeni AIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 100,000 400,000
800,000

2015 LTIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 62,500 250,000
500,000
62,500
250,000
500,000
249,046
PRS 5/6/2015 2/9/2015 4,064
479,958

Anne Chwat AIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 69,750 279,000
558,000

2015 LTIP 2/9/2015 2/9/2015 34,875 139,500
279,000
34,875
139,500
279,000
138,967
PRS 5/6/2015 2/9/2015 5,080
599,948


Name	Type of Award (1)	Grant Date (2)		Date of Compensation Committee Approval			Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (3)						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (4)						All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) (5)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ($) (6)
							Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)
Andreas Fibig	AIP		2/7/2016		2/7/2016			390,000		1,560,000		3,120,000
Andreas Fibig	2016 LTIP		2/7/2016		2/7/2016			250,000		1,000,000		2,000,000		250,000		1,000,000		2,000,000				921,858
	PRSU		5/2/2016		2/7/2016															6,009		719,938
	RSU		5/2/2016		2/7/2016															11,685		1,322,041

Richard O’Leary	AIP		2/7/2016		2/7/2016			61,066		244,262		488,525
Richard O’Leary	2016 LTIP		2/7/2016		2/7/2016			25,000		100,000		200,000		25,000		100,000		200,000				92,186
	PRSU		5/2/2016		2/7/2016															2,754		329,957
	RSU		11/1/2016		11/1/2016	(7)														7,472		924,436

Nicolas Mirzayantz	AIP		2/7/2016		2/7/2016			120,000		480,000		960,000
Nicolas Mirzayantz	2016 LTIP		2/7/2016		2/7/2016			62,500		250,000		500,000		62,500		250,000		500,000				230,464
	PRSU		5/2/2016		2/7/2016															6,510		779,963

Matthias Haeni	AIP		2/7/2016		2/7/2016			105,000		420,000		840,000
Matthias Haeni	2016 LTIP		2/7/2016		2/7/2016			62,500		250,000		500,000		62,500		250,000		500,000				230,464
	PRSU		5/2/2016		2/7/2016															5,007		599,889

Anne Chwat	AIP		2/7/2016		2/7/2016			71,250		285,000		570,000
	2016 LTIP		2/7/2016		2/7/2016			35,625		142,500		285,000		35,625		142,500		285,000				131,365
	PRSU		5/2/2016		2/7/2016															5,258		629,961

Alison A. Cornell	AIP		2/7/2016		2/7/2016			112,000		448,000		896,000
Alison A. Cornell	2016 LTIP		2/7/2016		2/7/2016			62,500		250,000		500,000		62,500		250,000		500,000				230,464
	PRSU		5/2/2016		2/7/2016															2,504		300,004
	RSU		5/2/2016		2/7/2016															2,086		236,010


(1)	AIP = ~~2015~~2016 AIP

~~2015~~

2016 LTIP = ~~2015-2017~~2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan Cycle

RSU = Restricted Stock Unit

~~PRS = Purchased Restricted Stock~~

PRSU = Purchased Restricted Stock Unit

70IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


(2)	All equity, AIP and LTIP grants were made under our 2015 SAIP. The material terms of these types of awards are described in this proxy statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”


(3)	AIP amounts in this column are the threshold, target and maximum dollar values under our ~~2015~~2016 AIP. ~~2015~~2016 LTIP amounts in this column are the threshold, target and maximum dollar values of the 50% portion of our ~~2015-2017~~2016-2018 LTIP cycle that would be payable in cash if the performance conditions are satisfied.

(4)

~~2015~~2016 LTIP amounts in this column are the threshold, target and maximum dollar values of the 50% portion of our ~~2015-2017~~2016-2018 LTIP cycle that would be payable in stock if the performance conditions are satisfied. The number of shares of our common stock for the 50% portion payable in stock was determined at the beginning of the ~~2015~~2016 LTIP cycle, based on ~~$102.14~~$119.27 per share, the average closing market price of a share of our common stock for the 20 trading days preceding January 1, ~~2015,~~2016, the first trading day of the ~~2015-2017~~2016-2018 LTIP ~~cycle (except for Ms. Cornell's stock portion which was based on $111.19 per share, the average closing market price for the 20 trading days preceding July 8, 2015).~~cycle. However, the actual value to be realized may vary depending on the closing market price of a share of our common stock on the payout date of ~~2015~~2016 LTIP awards.

(5)

~~The~~Except for the RSU award granted to Mr. O’Leary in November 2016 in connection with his promotion to CFO, the amounts in this column represent the number of ~~PRS shares or~~ PRSUs and RSUs granted under the ~~ECP in 2015 on the grant date. Dividends~~ECP. Dividend equivalents are paid on ~~PRS shares.~~PRSUs. Footnote 4 to the Summary Compensation Table states the dollar amount delivered by our NEOs (in tendered shares or cash) for these ~~PRS~~PRSU awards. The material terms of the ECP awards are described in this proxy statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion & Analysis.” See footnote 7 regarding Mr. O’Leary’s November 2016 grant.

(6)

The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted to our NEOs during the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of LTIP awards pertains to the 50% portion of those awards that will be payable in shares of our common stock if the performance conditions are satisfied, and is based on the probable outcome of such conditions.


(7)	~~This~~Mr. O’Leary was granted a special RSU award ~~represents a grant of RSUs~~in connection with his promotion to ~~Mr. O'Leary for acting as Interim Chief Financial Officer.~~CFO in November 2016.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 71

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

~~Table of Contents~~

Long-Term Incentive Plan

~~2013-2015~~

2014-2016 LTIP Payout

The following table sets forth the total amount earned by each NEO based on achievement of the corporate performance goals for each segment under the ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 LTIP cycle and based on each executive’s target amount (or reduced target amount for each NEO who was not employed in his current role for the entire three-year cycle). The amount reported in the “Total” column is the amount being paid out to the NEOs in ~~2015~~2017 following completion of the ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 LTIP cycle.

Segment I
(2013)

Segment 2
(2014)

Segment 3
(2015)

Cumulative
(2013 – 2015)
Total

Cash
($)

Shares
(#)

Cash
($)

Shares
(#)

Cash
($)

Shares
(#)

Cash
($)

Shares
(#)

Cash
($)

Shares
(#)
Andreas Fibig (1) —
—
102,265
1,021
292,500
2,921
217,298
2,172
612,063
6,114
Alison A. Cornell (2) —
—
—
—
35,458
319
19,734
176
55,192
495
Richard O’Leary 24,350
369
22,276
338
21,293
323
35,583
540
103,502
1,570
Nicolas Mirzayantz 75,263
1,141
68,850
1,044
65,813
998
109,969
1,668
319,895
4,851
Matthias Haeni 28,255
428
25,848
392
24,708
374
41,285
628
120,096
1,822
Anne Chwat 46,663
708
42,687
647
40,804
619
68,181
1,032
198,335
3,006

~~____________________~~

~~(1) Amount related to 2014 is prorated based on Mr. Fibig’s appointment as CEO in September 2014.~~

~~(2) Amount related to 2015 is prorated based on Ms. Cornell’s appointment as CFO in July 2015.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~2014-2016~~


	Segment 1 (2014)				Segment 2 (2015)				Segment 3 (2016)				Cumulative (2014 – 2016)				Total
	Cash ($)		Shares (#)		Cash ($)		Shares (#)		Cash ($)		Shares (#)		Cash ($)		Shares (#)		Cash ($)		Shares (#)
Andreas Fibig (1)		102,265		1,021		292,500		2,921		95,875		958		296,994		2,968		787,634		7,868
Richard O’Leary		23,010		269		21,995		257		7,209		84		28,672		334		80,886		944
Nicolas Mirzayantz		76,500		895		73,125		855		23,969		280		95,313		1,115		268,907		3,145
Matthias Haeni		76,500		895		73,125		855		23,969		280		95,313		1,115		268,907		3,145
Anne Chwat		42,687		499		40,804		477		13,375		156		53,184		621		150,050		1,753
Alison A. Cornell (2)		—		—		35,458		319		18,665		168		40,260		361		94,383		848

(1)	Amount related to 2014 is prorated based on Mr. Fibig’s appointment as CEO in September 2014.

(2)	Amount related to 2015 is prorated based on Ms. Cornell’s appointment as CFO in July 2015. The amount related to 2016 is prorated based on Ms. Cornell’s separation from the Company in October 2016.

2015-2017 LTIP Credit

Based on our achievement of the corporate performance goals for the ~~2015~~2016 segment (the second ~~segment) of the 2014-2016 LTIP cycle and the executive’s target amount, the following cash amounts and number of shares of our stock have been credited on behalf of the executive:~~

Segment 2
(2015)

Cash
($)
Shares
(#)
Andreas Fibig 292,500
2,921
Alison A. Cornell (1) 35,458
319
Richard O’Leary 21,995
257
Nicolas Mirzayantz 73,125
855
Matthias Haeni 73,125
855
Anne Chwat 40,804
477

~~____________________~~

~~(1) Amount prorated based on Ms. Cornell’s appointment as CFO in July 2015.~~

~~2015-2017 LTIP Credit~~

~~Based on our achievement of the corporate performance goals for the 2015 segment (the first~~ segment) of the 2015-2017 LTIP cycle and the executive’s target amount, the following cash amounts and number of shares of our stock have been credited on behalf of the executive:

Segment 1
(2015)

Cash
($)
Shares
(#)
Andreas Fibig 292,500
2,864
Alison A. Cornell (1) 35,458
319
Richard O’Leary 28,576
280
Nicolas Mirzayantz 73,125
716
Matthias Haeni 73,125
716
Anne Chwat 40,804
399

~~____________________~~

~~(1) Amount~~


	Segment 2 (2016)
	Cash ($)		Shares (#)
Andreas Fibig	$	95,875		939
Richard O’Leary	$	9,367		92
Nicolas Mirzayantz	$	23,969		235
Matthias Haeni	$	23,969		235
Anne Chwat	$	13,375		131
Alison A. Cornell (1)	$	18,665		168

(1)

The amount related to 2015 is prorated based on Ms. Cornell’s appointment as CFO in July 2015. The amount related to 2016 is prorated based on Ms. Cornell’s separation from the Company in October 2016.

72IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2016-2018 LTIP Credit

Based on ~~Ms. Cornell’s appointment as CFO in July 2015.~~

our achievement of the corporate performance goals for the 2016 segment (the first segment) of the 2016-2018 LTIP cycle and the executive’s target amount, the following cash amounts and number of shares of our stock have been credited on behalf of the executive:


	Segment 1 (2016)
	Cash ($)		Shares (#)
Andreas Fibig		47,938		402
Richard O’Leary		4,794		40
Nicolas Mirzayantz		11,984		100
Matthias Haeni		11,984		100
Anne Chwat		6,831		57
Alison A. Cornell (1)		9,332		78

(1)

The amount related to 2016 is prorated based on Ms. Cornell’s separation from the Company in October 2016.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 73

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

~~Table of Contents~~

Equity Compensation Plan Information

We currently grant equity awards under our 2015 SAIP only, which replaced our 2010 ~~SAIP.~~Stock Award and Incentive Plan (the “2010 SAIP”). The following table provides information regarding our common stock which may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, ~~2015.~~

Plan Category
Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))

(a) (b) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1) 843,326
(2) 52.59
(3) 2,547,132

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (4) 204,433
52.59
(3) 229,995
(5)
Total 1,047,759
52.59
(3) 2,777,127

2016.


Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights			Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights			Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
	(a)			(b)			(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)		615,897	(2)	$	59.14	(3)		2,498,543
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (4)		237,850		$	59.14	(3)		217,380	(5)

Total		853,746		$	59.14	(3)		2,715,923

(1)

Represents the 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (the “2015 SAIP”). The 2015 Plan replaced the Company’s 2010 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”) and provides the source for future deferrals of cash into deferred stock under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan (with the Deferred Compensation Plan being deemed a ~~subplan~~sub-plan under the 2010 Plan for the sole purpose of funding deferrals under the IFF Share Fund).

(2)

Includes options, RSUs, SSARs, the number of shares to be issued under the ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 LTIP cycle based on actual performance, and the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2014-2016 and 2015-2017 LTIP cycles if the performance conditions for each of those cycles are satisfied at the maximum level. The number of SSARs that may be issued upon exercise was calculated by dividing (i) the product of (a) the excess of the closing market price of our common stock on the last trading day of ~~2015~~2016 over the exercise price, and (b) the number of SSARs outstanding by (ii) the closing market price on the last trading day of ~~2015.~~2016. Excludes outstanding shares of PRS under the 2010 SAIP and 2000 SAIP.


(3)	Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options and SSARs. Excludes RSUs, shares credited to accounts of participants in the DCP and shares that may be issued under the ~~2013-2015~~2015-2017 and ~~2014-2016~~2016-2018 LTIP cycles.


(4)	We currently have two equity compensation plans that have not been approved by our shareholders: (i) the DCP, which is described on page 4679 and (ii) a pool of shares that may be used for annual awards of 1,000 shares to each non-employee director. Although we are no longer granting these annual 1,000 share stock awards to directors, the pool of shares remains authorized.


(5)	Includes ~~186,245~~173,630 shares remaining available for issuance under the DCP and 43,750 shares remaining available for issuance from a pool of shares that may be used for annual awards of 1,000 shares to each non-employee director.

74IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

~~Table of Contents~~

2016 Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End

The following table provides information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our NEOs at December 31, ~~2015.~~

~~2015 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End~~

Name Grant Date Grant Type (1)
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)

Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested
($)(2)

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)

Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards: Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(2)
Andreas Fibig 4/30/2013 RSU 1,295
(3) 154,934
—
—
9/1/2014 2014 LTIP 3,942
(4) 471,657
8,886
(5) 1,063,121
2/11/2015 2015 LTIP 2,864
(6) 342,668
    14,684
(7) 1,756,794
10/15/2014 RSU 7,967
(8) 953,172
—
—
5/6/2015 RSU 7,620
(9) 911,657
—
—
5/6/2015 PRS 11,176
(9) 1,337,097
—
—

Alison A. Cornell 7/8/2015 2014 LTIP 319
(4) 38,214
    1,682
(5) 201,234
7/8/2015 2015 LTIP 319
(6) 38,214
    3,180
(7) 380,455
8/17/2015 PRSU 2,608
(10) 312,021
—
—

Richard O’Leary 4/30/2013 PRS 3,109
(11) 371,961
—
—
2/5/2014 2014 LTIP 526
(4) 62,892
878
(5) 105,044
5/13/2014 PRS 2,749
(12) 328,890
—
—
1/2/2015 RSU 1,487
(13) 177,905
—
—
2/11/2015 2015 LTIP 280
(6) 33,455
     1,436
(7) 171,803
5/6/2015 PRS 2,540
(9) 303,886
—
—

Nicolas Mirzayantz 4/30/2013 PRS 9,327
(11) 1,115,882
—
—
2/5/2014 2014 LTIP 1,750
(4) 209,372
2,924
(5) 349,827
5/13/2014 PRS 7,943
(12) 950,301
—
—
6/13/2014 RSU 20,000
(14) 2,392,800
—
—
2/11/2015 2015 LTIP 716
(6) 85,667
     3,672
(7) 439,318
5/6/2015 PRS 7,112
(9) 850,880
—
—

Matthias Haeni 4/30/2013 PRS 1,922
(11) 229,948
—
—
2/5/2014 2014 LTIP 1,750
(4) 209,372
2,924
(5) 349,827
5/13/2014 PRS 3,666
(12) 438,600
—
—
2/11/2015 2015 LTIP 716
(6) 85,667
3,672
(7) 439,318
5/6/2015 PRS 4,064
(9) 486,217
—
—

Anne Chwat 4/30/2013 PRS 6,607
(11) 790,461
—
—
2/5/2014 2014 LTIP 976
(4) 116,739
1,630
(5) 195,013
5/13/2014 PRS 5,499
(12) 657,900
—
—
2/11/2015 2015 LTIP 399
(6) 47,733
2,050
(7) 245,262
5/6/2015 PRS 5,080
(9) 607,771
—
—

~~_________________________~~

2016.


Name	Grant Date	Grant Type (1)	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)			Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(2)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units Or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(2)
Andreas Fibig	10/15/2014	RSU		7,967	(3)		938,752
	2/11/2015	2015 LTIP		5,498	(4)		647,854		9,788 (5)		1,153,320
	5/6/2015	RSU		7,620	(6)		897,865
	5/6/2015	PRS		11,176	(6)		1,316,868
	2/8/2016	2016 LTIP		1,128	(7)		132,871		3,668 (8)		432,200
	5/2/2016	PRSU		6,009	(9)		708,040
	5/2/2016	RSU		11,685	(9)		1,376,844
Richard O’Leary	5/13/2014	PRS		2,749	(3)		323,915
	1/2/2015	RSU		1,487	(10)		175,213
	2/11/2015	2015 LTIP		537	(4)		63,250		958 (5)		112,881
	5/6/2015	PRS		2,540	(6)		299,288
	2/8/2016	2016 LTIP		113	(7)		13,312		1,466 (8)		172,739
	5/2/2016	PRSU		2,754	(9)		324,504
	11/1/2016	RSU		7,472	(11)		880,426
Nicolas Mirzayantz	5/13/2014	PRS		7,943	(3)		935,924
	2/11/2015	2015 LTIP		1,375	(4)		161,963		2,448 (5)		288,448
	5/6/2015	PRS		7,112	(6)		838,007
	2/8/2016	2016 LTIP		282	(7)		33,218		3,668 (8)		432,200
	5/2/2016	PRSU		6,510	(9)		767,073
Matthias Haeni	5/13/2014	PRS		3,666	(3)		431,965
	2/11/2015	2015 LTIP		1,375	(4)		161,963		2,448 (5)		288,448
	5/6/2015	PRS		4,064	(6)		478,861
	2/8/2016	2016 LTIP		282	(7)		33,218		3,668 (8)		432,200
	5/2/2016	PRSU		5,007	(9)		589,975
Anne Chwat	5/13/2014	PRS		5,499	(3)		647,947
	2/11/2015	2015 LTIP		766	(4)		90,244		1,368 (5)		161,191
	5/6/2015	PRS		5,080	(6)		598,576
	2/8/2016	2016 LTIP		160	(7)		18,891		2,092 (8)		246,500
	5/2/2016	PRSU		5,258	(9)		619,550
Alison A. Cornell	7/8/2015	2015 LTIP		791	(12)		93,168		474 (4)		55,851
	8/17/2015	PRSU		1,032	(12)		121,601
	2/8/2016	2016 LTIP		220	(12)		25,864		682 (6)		80,360
	5/2/2016	PRSU		383	(12)		45,129
	5/2/2016	RSU		319	(12)		37,588


(1)	~~2014~~2015 LTIP = ~~2014-2016~~2015-2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan Cycle

~~2015~~

2016 LTIP = ~~2015-2017~~2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan Cycle

PRS = Purchased Restricted Stock

RSU = Restricted Stock Unit

PRSU = Purchased Restricted Stock Unit


(2)	The market value was determined based on the closing price of our common stock on December ~~31, 2015.~~30, 2016. For PRS and PRSU awards, the amounts in this column do not reflect the purchase price paid by the NEO for PRS shares under the ECP as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.


(3)	This award ~~was granted to Mr. Fibig as a non-employee director and~~ vests on April ~~30, 2016.~~13, 2017.


(4)	This amount represents the number of shares of stock that have been credited for the ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2015~~2016 segment of the ~~2014-2016~~2015-2017 LTIP cycle. ~~These~~The shares will ~~remain unvested~~not be paid out until the completion of the full three-year ~~LTIP~~ cycle.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 75

~~Table of Contents~~

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


(5)	This amount represents the maximum number of shares of stock that remain subject to the achievement of specified performance objectives over the remaining two open segments of the ~~2014-2016~~2015-2017 LTIP cycle. Shares earned during any segment of the ~~2014-2016~~2015-2017 LTIP cycle will remain unvested until the completion of the full three-year cycle.

(6)	This award vests on April 6, 2018.

~~(6)~~(7)

This amount represents the number of shares of stock that have been credited for the ~~2015~~2016 segment of the ~~2015-2017~~2016-2018 LTIP cycle. These shares will remain unvested until the completion of the full three-year LTIP cycle.


~~(7)~~(8)	This amount represents the maximum number of shares of stock that remain subject to the achievement of specified performance objectives over the remaining three open segments of the ~~2015-2017~~2016-2018 LTIP cycle. Shares earned during any segment of the ~~2015-2017~~2016-2018 LTIP cycle will remain unvested until the completion of the full three-year cycle.


~~(8)~~	~~This award vests on April 13, 2017.~~


(9)	This award vests on April ~~6, 2018.~~2, 2019.


(10)	This award ~~vests~~vested on ~~July 17, 2018.~~January 3, 2017.


(11)	This award vests on ~~March 31, 2016.~~November 1, 2020.


(12)	~~This award vests~~Pursuant to the ESP, upon her separation from the Company in October 2016, Ms. Cornell became entitled to (i) a prorated portion of the earned and banked segments of the 2015-2017 LTIP cycle and 2016-2018 LTIP cycle, to be paid out on ~~April 13, 2017.~~their respective payout dates, and (ii) a prorated portion of her ECP awards, to vest on their respective vesting dates.


~~(13)~~	~~This award vests on January 2, 2017.~~


~~(14)~~	~~This award vests on June 13, 2016.~~

76IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Option Exercises and~~2016 Stock Vested

The following table provides information regarding stock vested during ~~2015~~2016 for each of our NEOs. NoNone of our NEOs hold options orand no SSARs were exercised by our NEOs during ~~2015.~~

~~2015 Option Exercises and Stock Vested~~

Stock Awards
Name Type of Award(1)
Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)

Value Realized on
Vesting ($)
Andreas Fibig RSU (2) 1,655
194,330
RSU (3) 1,145
129,030
PRS (4)(5) 6,373
745,450
2013 LTIP (6) 6,114
731,479

Alison A. Cornell 2013 LTIP (6) 495
67,617

Richard O’Leary PRS (4)(5) 7,948
689,688
2013 LTIP (6) 1,570
187,835

Nicolas Mirzayantz PRS (4)(5) 19,870
1,724,219
2013 LTIP (6) 4,851
580,374

Matthias Haeni PRS (4)(5) 4,912
426,239
2013 LTIP (6) 1,822
217,984

Anne Chwat RSU (7) 250
27,160
PRS (4)(5) 13,909
1,206,953
2013 LTIP (6) 3,006
359,638

~~_______________________~~

2016.


	Stock Awards
Name	Type of Award (1)	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)
Andreas Fibig	RSU (2)		1,295	154,714
	2014 LTIP (3)		7,868	927,086
Richard O’Leary	PRS (4)(5)		3,109	353,711
	2014 LTIP (3)		944	111,232
Nicolas Mirzayantz	PRS (4)(5)		9,327	1,061,133
	RSU (6)		20,000	2,546,800
	2014 LTIP (3)		3,145	370,575
Matthias Haeni	PRS (4)(5)		1,922	218,666
	2014 LTIP (3)		3,145	370,575
Anne Chwat	PRS (4)(5)		6,607	751,678
	2014 LTIP (3)		1,753	206,556
Alison A. Cornell	2014 LTIP (3)		848	99,920


(1)	RSU = Restricted Stock Unit

~~PRS = Purchased Restricted Stock~~

~~2013 LTIP = 2013-2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan Cycle~~

PRS = Purchased Restricted Stock

2014 LTIP = 2014-2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan Cycle

(2)	The award represented in this row was granted in ~~2012~~2013 to Mr. Fibig while he was a member of the Board of Directors and vested on ~~May 1, 2015.~~April 30, 2016. The value realized is based on the closing price of our common stock on April 29, 2016 ($119.47).

(3)

The award represented in this row is the equity portion of the 2014-2016 LTIP award, for which performance was completed on December 31, 2016. The number of shares represents the actual number of shares that will be issued to the participant in March 2017, as determined by the Board of Directors in February 2017. The value realized is based on the number of shares and the closing market price of a share of our common stock on December 31, 2016 ($117.83); however, the actual value realized may vary depending on the closing market price of a share of our common stock on the payout date.

(4)	The award represented in this row was granted in 2013 under the ECP and vested on March 31, 2016. The value realized is based on the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date ($~~117.42)~~113.77).


~~(3)~~	The award represented in this row was granted in 2014 to Mr. Fibig while he was a member of the Board of Directors and vested on May 13, 2015. The value realized is based on the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date ($112.69).


~~(4)~~	~~The award represented in this row was granted in 2012 under the ECP and vested on April 1, 2015. The value realized is based on the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date ($116.97).~~

(5)

The amounts set forth in this table as the value realized attributable to vested PRS is the product of (a) the number of vested shares of PRS and (b) the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date, less the aggregate amount paid by the executive to purchase the PRS. Without taking into account the amount paid by the respective executive for his or her PRS shares, the value realized on vesting in the Value Realized on Vesting column attributable to PRS for this executive would be: Mr. ~~Fibig - $745,450; Mr.~~ O’Leary ~~- $929,678;~~— $353,711; Mr. Mirzayantz ~~- $2,324,194; Mr. Haeni - $574,557;~~— $1,061,133; and Ms. Chwat ~~- $1,626,936.~~— $751,6781.

(6)

The award represented in this row is the equity portion of the 2013-2015 LTIP award, for which performance was completed on December 31, 2015. The number of shares represents the actual number of shares that will be issued to the participant in March 2016, as determined by the Board of Directors in February 2016. The value realized is based on the number of shares and the closing market price of a share of our common stock on December 31, 2015 ($119.64); however, the actual value realized may vary depending on the closing market price of a share of our common stock on the payout date.


~~(7)~~	This award represents a special ~~recognition~~retention award of RSUs to ~~Ms. Chwat in connection with the Aromor acquisition.~~Mr. Mirzayantz. The value realized is based on the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date of ~~February 2, 2015~~June 13, 2016 ($~~106.78)~~127.34).

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 77

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Pension Benefits

We provide a defined benefit pension plan (the “U.S. Pension Plan”) to eligible United States-based employees hired before January 1, 2006. Of our NEOs, only Mr. Mirzayantz currently participates in the U.S. Pension Plan. U.S. employees hired on or after January 1, 2006, including all of our other NEOs, are not eligible to participate in the U.S. Pension Plan. We pay the full cost of providing benefits under the U.S. Pension Plan.

~~Table of Contents~~

Compensation and service earned after December 31, 2007 are not taken into account in determining an employee’s benefit under the U.S. Pension Plan except for employees whose combined age and years of service equaled or exceeded 70 as of December 31, 2007. As Mr. Mirzayantz did not satisfy this requirement, Mr. Mirzayantz had his benefit frozen as of December 31, 2007.

The monthly pension benefit is equal to the number of years of credited service as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 times the difference between (a) 1.7% times final average compensation, and (b) 1.25% times the social security amount. Final average compensation for purposes of the U.S. Pension Plan is the average of the five consecutive years of compensation during the last ten years before December 31, 2007 that produce the highest average. The term “compensation” means the basic rate of monthly salary (as of April 1 each year) plus 1/12 of any AIP cash award received for the preceding year, reduced by any compensation deferred under our DCP. The normal retirement age under the U.S. Pension Plan is age 65.

Various provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“IRC”) limit the amount of compensation used in determining benefits payable under our U.S. Pension Plan. We established anon-qualified Supplemental Retirement Plan to pay that part of the pension benefit that, because of these IRC limitations, cannot be paid under the U.S. Pension Plan to our U.S. senior executives. For purposes of the Supplemental Retirement Plan, “compensation” includes any salary and AIP amounts, including amounts deferred under our DCP.

Employees with at least 10 years of service are eligible for early retirement under the U.S. Pension Plan and the Supplemental Retirement Plan beginning at age 55. The benefit at early retirement is an unreduced benefit payable at age 62 or a reduced benefit (4% per year) if paid prior to age 62.

The following table provides information for Mr. Mirzayantz regarding our U.S. Pension Plan and Supplemental Retirement Plan. The present value of accumulated benefits payable under each of our retirement plans was determined using the following assumptions: an interest rate of 4.1%; theRP-2000 Healthy Participant Male/Female Mortality with projections of mortality improvements; 80% of participants are married with a spouse four years younger and are receiving a 50% joint and survivor annuity and 20% of participants are unmarried and are receiving a straight life annuity with a five-year guarantee. Additional information regarding the valuation method and material assumptions used to determine the accumulated benefits reported in the table is presented in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2015 Annual Report. The information provided in the columns other than the Payments During Last Fiscal Year column is presented as of December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the measurement date used for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~

2016.

78IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Pension Benefits

Name Plan Name
Number
of Years
Credited
Service
(#)

Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefits
Assuming
Retirement
Age of 62
($)(1)

Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefits
Assuming
Retirement
Age of 65
($)(2)

Payments
During
Last
Fiscal
Year ($)
Nicolas Mirzayantz (3) U.S. Pension Plan 16.23
542,078
450,062
—
Supplemental Retirement Plan 16.23
863,751
717,132
—
1,405,829
1,167,194
—

~~_____________________~~


Name	Plan Name	Number of Years Credited Service (#)		Present Value of Accumulated Benefits Assuming Retirement Age of 62 ($)(1)		Present Value of Accumulated Benefits Assuming Retirement Age of 65 ($)(2)		Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($)
Nicolas Mirzayantz (3)	U.S. Pension Plan		16.23		558,771		463,537		—
	Supplemental Retirement Plan		16.23		890,349		738,602		—

					1,449,120		1,202,139		—


(1)	The amounts in this column assume benefit commencement at unreduced early retirement at age 62 (with at least 10 years of credited service) and otherwise were determined using interest rate, mortality and payment distribution assumptions consistent with those used in our financial statements.


(2)	The amounts in this column assume benefit commencement at normal retirement at age 65 and otherwise were determined using interest rate, mortality and payment distribution assumptions consistent with those used in our financial statements.


(3)	Benefits for Mr. Mirzayantz under the U.S. Pension Plan and Supplemental Retirement Plan were frozen as of December 31, 2007 because his age and service as of December 31, 2007 did not equal or exceed 70.

~~Table of Contents~~

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

We offer our executive officers and other senior employees based in the United States an opportunity to defer compensation under ournon-qualified deferred compensation plan, or DCP. The DCP allows these employees to defer salary, annual and long-term incentive awards and receipt of stock under some equity awards. There is no limit on the amount of compensation that a participant may elect to defer. Subject to certain limitations on the number of installments and periods over which installments will be paid, participants in the DCP elect the timing and number of installments as to which the participant’s DCP account will be settled. Deferred cash compensation may be treated at the election of the participant as invested ~~in (i)~~ in:

a variety of equity and debt mutual funds offered by The Vanguard Group, which administers the DCP, or ~~(ii)~~

a fund valued by reference to the value of our common stock with dividends reinvested (the “IFF Stock Fund”), or ~~(iii)~~

an interest-bearing account.

Except for deferrals into the IFF Stock Fund, the participant may generally change his or her choice of funds at any time. For the interest-bearing account, our Compensation Committee establishes an interest rate each year which we intend to be equal to 120% of the applicable federal long-term interest rate. For ~~2015~~2016 this interest rate was ~~3.25%~~3.10% and for ~~2016~~2017 this interest rate is ~~3.10%~~2.69%.

We make matching contributions under the DCP to make up for tax limitations on our matching contributions under our Retirement Investment Fund Plan, a 401(k) plan. The 401(k) plan provides for matching contributions at a rate of $1.00 for each dollar of contribution up to 4% of a participant’s salary plus $0.75 for each dollar of contribution above 4% up to 8% of a participant’s salary.

Tax rules limit the amount of the Company match under the 401(k) plan for our senior executives. The DCP matching contribution reflects the amount of the matching contribution which is limited by the tax laws. The same requirements under the 401(k) plan for matching, including vesting, apply to matching contributions under the DCP. These matching contributions automatically vest once a participant completes three years of service with our Company.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 79

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The DCP gives participants an incentive to defer compensation into the IFF Stock Fund by granting a 25% premium, credited in additional deferred stock, on all cash compensation deferred into the stock fund contingent upon the participant remaining employed by the Company (other than for retirement) for the full calendar year following the year when such credit was made. If the participant withdraws any deferred stock within one year of a deferral, any premium shares credited will be forfeited. Vesting of the premium deferred stock accelerates upon a change in control. RSUs granted under our equity compensation plans may also be deferred upon vesting, but no premium is added.

The following table provides information for our NEOs regarding participation in our DCP.

~~2015~~

2016Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

Name
Executive
Contributions
in Last FY ($)

Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(1)

Aggregate
Earnings
in Last
FY ($)

Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions ($)

Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)(2)
Andreas Fibig 194,330
—
49,952
—
754,171
Alison A. Cornell 81,667
(3) —
84
—
81,803
Richard O’Leary —
—
21,369
—
129,646
Nicolas Mirzayantz 217,562
(4) 37,201
52,608
—
1,678,204
Matthias Haeni —
—
—
—
—
Anne Chwat 210,394
(5) 40,977
155,507
—
1,684,961

~~____________________~~


Name	Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)			Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($)(1)		Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)		Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)		Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)(2)

Andreas Fibig		473,464	(3)		181,356		8,927		—		1,417,918
Richard O’Leary		33,767	(4)		29,975		(1,914)		—		191,474
Nicolas Mirzayantz		76,080	(5)		31,196		98,078		—		1,883,558
Matthias Haeni		—			—		—		—		—
Anne Chwat		271,572	(6)		66,909		55,917		277,562		2,079,358
Alison A. Cornell		152,277	(7)		31,309		7,479		—		272,867


(1)	The amounts in this column are included in the All Other Compensation column for ~~2015~~2016 in the Summary Compensation Table, and represent employer contributions credited to the participant’s account during ~~2015,~~2016, as well as certain contributions credited in the first quarter of 2016 related to compensation earned in ~~2015.~~2016.

~~Table of Contents~~

(2)

If a person was a NEO in previous years’ proxy statements, this amount includes amounts that were included as compensation previously reported for that person in the Summary Compensation Table for those previous years. Of the totals in this column, the following amounts were reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for 2006: Mr. Mirzayantz –— $87,985; for 2007: Mr. Mirzayantz –— $160,010; for 2008: Mr. Mirzayantz –— $63,269; for 2009: Mr. Mirzayantz –— $31,228; for 2010: Mr. Mirzayantz –— $243,228; for 2011: Mr. Mirzayantz –— $45,600; Ms. Chwat –— $316,928; for 2012: Mr. Mirzayantz –— $516,144; Ms. Chwat –— $398,970; for 2013: Mr. Mirzayantz –— $751,443; Ms. Chwat –— $509,236; ~~and~~ for 2014: Mr. Fibig –— $443,624; Mr. ~~O'Leary –~~O’Leary — $161,002; Mr. Mirzayantz –— $500,852; Ms. Chwat ~~– $305,561.~~— $305,561; and for 2015: Mr. Fibig — $631,680; Mr. O’Leary — $115,933; Mr. Mirzayantz — $255,521; Ms. Chwat — $182,715; Ms. Cornell — $94,679.

(3)	Of this amount, $318,750 is included in the Salary column for 2016 in the Summary Compensation Table. Mr. Fibig also deferred $154,714 which is the value of RSUs that vested in 2016 as reflected in the Stock Vested table.

~~(3)~~(4)

This amount is included in the Salary column for ~~2015~~2016 in the Summary Compensation Table.


~~(4)~~(5)	Of this amount, ~~$58,500~~$30,000 is included in the Salary column for ~~2015~~2016 in the Summary Compensation Table. Mr. Mirzayantz also deferred ~~$159,062~~$46,080 which is a portion of his AIP and was included in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column for ~~2014~~2015 in the Summary Compensation Table.


~~(5)~~(6)	Of this amount, ~~$139,500~~$236,250 is included in the Salary column for ~~2015~~2016 in the Summary Compensation Table. Ms. Chwat also deferred ~~$70,894~~$35,321 which is a portion of her AIP and was included in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column for ~~2014~~2015 in the Summary Compensation Table.

(7)	This amount is included in the Salary column for 2016 in the Summary Compensation Table.

80IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

~~Potential Payments upon~~ Termination and Change in Control

Arrangements

Executive Severance Policy

We currently provide severance payments and benefits to our NEOs and other senior executives under our ESP. The level of severance pay under the ESP is based on a tier system. Each ~~executive's~~executive’s assigned tier is based on the ~~executive's~~executive’s grade level. The Compensation Committee may also agree to provide enhanced severance payments and benefits to specific executives. All our NEOs are in Tier ~~I other than~~I. Mr. O’Leary, who is in Tier II. Our ESP was last modified in March 2015 to conform to the 2015 SAIP, including to streamline the Change in Control provisions, to clarify the clawback provisions and severance rights, and to modify the non-compete provisions. Mr. Fibig'sFibig’s offer letter has modified some of the relevant definitions, amounts and other terms regarding the benefits that he is eligible to receive under the ESP. In October 2016, we entered into a separation agreement with Ms. Cornell pursuant to which she received severance benefits under the ESP. See “Other Separation ~~Arrangements - Mr. Fibig”~~Arrangements” below for a discussion of Mr. Fibig’s ~~benefits.~~

benefits and a description of Ms. Cornell’s separation agreement.

Our ESP provides for acceleration of equity, severance payments and continuation of benefits in connection with an executive’s termination (1) if his or her employment is terminated by us without Cause or (2) in the case that such termination occurs within two years of a Change in Control, if his or her employment is terminated without Cause or he or she terminates his or her employment for Good Reason. In addition, a Tier I executive is eligible to receive payments if he or she terminates his or her employment for Good Reason prior to or more than two years after a Change in Control.

Our ESP states that a “Change in Control” (or “CiC”) will be deemed to have occurred when any of the following has occurred:


~~(i)~~	a person or group becomes the beneficial owner of 40% or more of the combined voting power of our then outstanding voting securities, other than beneficial ownership by us, any of our employee benefit plans or any person organized, appointed or established pursuant to the terms of any such benefit plan;

~~(ii)~~

individuals who, at March 9, 2015, constituted a majority of the Board (the “Incumbent Directors”) cease to constitute a majority of the Board for any reason; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to March 9, 2015 whose election or nomination for election to the Board was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Incumbent Directors then on the Board shall be an Incumbent Director; or

~~(iii)~~

the consummation of (A) a merger, consolidation, reorganization or similar transaction with us or in which our securities are issued, as a result of which the holders of our outstanding voting securities immediately before such event own, directly or indirectly, immediately after such event less than 60% of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the parent entity resulting from, or issuing its voting securities as part of, such event; (B) our complete liquidation or dissolution; or (C) a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets to any person.

~~Table~~ of ~~Contents~~40% or more of the combined voting power of our then outstanding voting securities, other than beneficial ownership by us, any of our employee benefit plans or any person organized, appointed or established pursuant to the terms of any such benefit plan;

individuals who, at February 7, 2017, constituted a majority of the Board (the “Incumbent Directors”) cease to constitute a majority of the Board for any reason; provided, however, that (i) any individual becoming a director subsequent to February 7, 2017 whose election or nomination for election to the Board was approved by a vote of at leasttwo-thirds of the Incumbent Directors then on the Board shall be an Incumbent Director and (ii) any individual initially elected or nominated as a director as a result of an actual or threatened election contest shall not be an Incumbent Director; or

Severance Benefits Other than in Connection with a Change in Control

Payment for Termination Without Cause.Pursuant to our ESP, any covered executive that is terminated by us without Cause prior to or more than two years after a CiC is entitled to receive the following:

A severance payment equal to (a) one and a half times (1.5x) in case of our Tier I executives, and (b) one times (1x) in case of our Tier II executives, the sum of the executive��s annual base salary at the date of termination plus the prorated portion of the executive’s target AIP award for the year in which termination occurs (payable to the Tier I or Tier II executive in regular installments over 18 or 12 months, respectively, following termination);

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 81

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

A prorated portion of the executive’s target AIP award for the year in which termination occurs, payable when such AIP amounts otherwise become payable;

~~(i)~~

A severance payment equal to (a) one and a half times (1.5x) in case of our Tier I executives, and (b) one times (1x) in case of our Tier II executives, the sum of the executive's annual base salary at the date of termination plus the prorated portion of the executive's target AIP award for the year in which termination occurs (payable to the Tier I or Tier II executive in regular installments over 18 or 12 months, respectively, following termination);


~~(ii)~~	~~A prorated portion of the executive’s target AIP award for the year in which termination occurs, payable when such AIP amounts otherwise become payable;~~


~~(iii)~~	~~A prorated portion of the executive’s target LTIP award for the cycles then in progress, payable when such LTIP amounts otherwise become payable;~~


~~(iv)~~	~~Vesting of a prorated portion of any unvested equity award(s); and~~


~~(v)~~	Continuation of medical, dental, disability and life insurance coverage for 18 months years in the case of our Tier I executives and 12 months for Tier II executives or until the executive obtains new employment providing similar benefits or attains age 65.

A prorated portion of the executive’s target LTIP award for the cycles then in progress, payable when such LTIP amounts otherwise become payable;

Vesting of a prorated portion of any unvested equity award(s), settled on the applicable vesting date as if termination had not occurred; and

Continuation of medical, dental, disability and life insurance coverage for 18 months in the case of our Tier I executives and 12 months for Tier II executives or until the executive obtains new employment providing similar benefits or attains age 65.

Payment for Termination With Good Reason.Pursuant to the ESP, if a Tier I employee terminates his or her employment for Good Reason prior to or more than two years after a CiC, than he or she is entitled to receive the same benefits as set forth above for “Termination Without Cause.”

Severance Benefits in Connection with a Change in Control

Upon the occurrence of a termination by us without Cause or by an executive for Good Reason within two years following a CiC, the executive would be entitled to the following:

~~(i)~~

A severance payment equal to two times (2x) in case of our Tier I executives, and one and a half times (1.5x) in case of our Tier II executives, the sum of the executive’s annual base salary at the date of termination plus the higher of (x) his or her average AIP award for the three most recent years and (y) his or her target AIP award for the year in which termination occurs, payable in a lump sum;


~~(ii)~~	~~A prorated portion of the executive’s target AIP award for the year in which termination occurs, payable in a lump sum;~~


~~(iii)~~	For each performance segment that ended prior to the termination, a payment equal to the LTIP award payment the executive would have been entitled to receive for such performance segment had the termination not occurred, payable in a lump sum;


~~(iv)~~	For each performance segment in which the executive’s date of termination occurs, a prorated portion of the executive’s target LTIP award for each performance segment in which the termination occurs, payable in a lump sum;


~~(v)~~	~~Vesting of any equity awards not already vested upon the CiC and, unless deferred by the executive, settlement of such equity awards;~~


~~(vi)~~	~~Vesting of any benefits under our Supplemental Retirement Plan; and~~


~~(vii)~~	Continuation of medical, dental, disability and life insurance coverage for 18 months for our Tier I executives, and 12 months for our Tier II executives or until the executive obtains new employment providing similar benefits or attains age 65.

~~Table~~ of ~~Contents~~our Tier I executives, and one and a half times (1.5x) in case of our Tier II executives, the sum of the executive’s annual base salary at the date of termination plus the higher of (x) his or her average AIP award for the three most recent years and (y) his or her target AIP award for the year in which termination occurs, payable in a lump sum;

A prorated portion of the executive’s target AIP award for the year in which termination occurs, payable in a lump sum;

For each performance segment that ended prior to the termination, a payment equal to the LTIP award payment the executive would have been entitled to receive for such performance segment had the termination not occurred, payable in a lump sum;

For each performance segment in which the executive’s date of termination occurs, a prorated portion of the executive’s target LTIP award for each performance segment in which the termination occurs, payable in a lump sum;

Vesting of any equity awards not already vested upon the CiC and, unless deferred by the executive, settlement of such equity awards;

Vesting of any benefits under our Supplemental Retirement Plan; and

Continuation of medical, dental, disability and life insurance coverage for 18 months for our Tier I executives, and 12 months for our Tier II executives or until the executive obtains new employment providing similar benefits or attains age 65.

Definitions.Our ESP defines Cause and Good Reason as follows:

“Cause” means:

^○

failure of the executive to perform his or her material duties in any material respect, which if reasonably susceptible to cure, has continued after written notice of such failure has been provided and the executive has not cured such failure within 10 days of receipt of such written notice;

"Cause" means (i) failure of the executive to perform his or her material duties in any material respect, which if reasonably susceptible to cure, has continued after written notice of such failure has been provided and the executive has not cured such failure within 10 days of receipt of such written notice; (ii) willful misconduct or gross negligence by the executive that has caused or is reasonably expected to result in material injury to our business, reputation, or prospects; (iii) the engagement by the executive in illegal conduct or any act of serious dishonesty which could reasonably be expected to result in material injury to our business or reputation or which adversely affects the executive’s ability to perform his or her duties; (iv) the executive being indicted or convicted of (or having pled guilty or nolo contendere to) a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, fraud, theft or financial impropriety; or (v) a material and willful violation by the executive of our rules, policies or procedures.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

^○

willful misconduct or gross negligence by the executive that has caused or is reasonably expected to result in material injury to our business, reputation, or prospects;

^○

the engagement by the executive in illegal conduct or any act of serious dishonesty which could reasonably be expected to result in material injury to our business or reputation or which adversely affects the executive’s ability to perform his or her duties;

^○

the executive being indicted or convicted of (or having pled guilty or nolo contendere to) a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, fraud, theft or financial impropriety; or

^○

a material and willful violation by the executive of our rules, policies or procedures.

“Good Reason” means any of the following: (i) a material decrease in the executive’s base salary, target bonus under an AIP, LTIP or Equity Choice Award, other than as part of an across-the-board reduction applicable to all similarly situated employees; (ii) a material diminution in the executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities; (iii) relocation of executive’s primary work location more than 50 miles from executive’s primary work location at the time of such requested relocation; or (iv) our failure to obtain the binding agreement of any successor expressly to assume and agree to fully perform our obligations under the ESP.

^○

a material decrease in the executive’s base salary, target bonus under an AIP, LTIP or Equity Choice Award, other than as part of anacross-the-board reduction applicable to all similarly situated employees;

^○

a material diminution in the executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities;

^○

relocation of executive’s primary work location more than 50 miles from executive’s primary work location at the time of such requested relocation; or

^○

our failure to obtain the binding agreement of any successor expressly to assume and agree to fully perform our obligations under the ESP.

However, “good reason” will only exist if the executive gives us notice within 90 days after the initial occurrence of any of the foregoing events and we fail to correct the matter within 30 days following receipt of such notice.

Tax~~Tax~~ Gross-Up~~. Executives~~.Executives are not entitled to receive a tax ~~“gross-up”~~“gross-up” payment. Instead, their severance payments would be subject to a “modifiedcut-back” provision, where severance or other payments to that executive would be reduced if this reduction would produce a betterafter-tax result for the executive. There would be no reduction, however, if the executive (who would be responsible for any excise tax) would have a betterafter-tax result without the reduction.

Participant Obligations for the Protection of Our Business and Clawback.As a condition of the executive’s right to receive severance payments and benefits, the ESP requires that he or ~~she (i)~~ she:

not compete with us, ~~(ii)~~

not solicit, induce, divert, employ, retain or interfere with or attempt to influence our relationship with any employee or person providing services to the Company and ~~(iii)~~

not interfere with or attempt to influence our relationship with any supplier, customer or other person with whom we do business.

These restrictions apply while an executive is employed and following a termination of employment during the period of 12 months in case ofnon-compete obligations and 24 months in case ofnon-solicitation obligations. In addition, executives are not entitled to severance if they engage in willful misconduct or a violation of a Company policy that is materially detrimental to us while employed by the

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 83

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Company. The ESP also conditions severance payments and benefits on the executive signing a release and termination agreement, and meeting continuing commitments relating to confidentiality, cooperation in litigation and return of our property.

As discussed above in “Compensation Discussion and ~~Analysis -~~ Analysis—Clawback Policy,” compensation received under our ESP is subject to our clawback policy if the executive breaches the obligations noted above or if any of the other events triggering a clawback, such as a financial misstatement or restatement, occur.

Effect of IRC Section 409A.The timing of some payments and benefits may be restricted under IRC Section 409A, which regulates deferred compensation. Some amounts payable to our NEOs or other participants under the ESP upon termination may be delayed until six months after termination.

Payments in connection with death, disability or retirement. Our executives may also receive payment if their employment terminates as a result of death, disability or retirement as set forth in the terms and conditions of their award agreements with the Company and, in the case of our CEO, his letter agreement as described below under “Other Separation ~~Arrangements -~~ Arrangements—Mr. Fibig.” Our NEOs are also entitled to payments under our Executive Death Benefit Plan as described in this proxy statement under the heading “Compensation Discussion and ~~Analysis -~~ Analysis—Executive Death Benefit Plan.” In the event of disability, our NEOs would be entitled to payments under our Disability Insurance Program that applies to salaried employees generally (60% of monthly salary up to a maximum of $15,000 per month).

~~Table of Contents~~

Other Separation Arrangements

Mr. Fibig

Details regarding Mr. Fibig’s letter agreement dated May 26, 2014 are included in this proxy statement under the heading “Employment Agreements or Arrangements” following the Summary Compensation Table. Under the terms of his letter agreement, Mr. Fibig is a participant in our ESP and is entitled to receive the benefits set forth for Tier I executives with the following modifications:

In connection with any termination without Cause or for Good Reason, not in connection with a CiC:


~~(i)~~^○	~~In connection with any termination without Cause or for Good Reason, not in connection with a CiC:~~


a.	Mr. Fibig’s severance payment will be a multiple of two times (2x) the sum of his annual base salary plus the average AIP bonus paid to him in the three years prior to termination, payable over 24 months; and

	^○
b.	Mr. Fibig will be entitled to receive a ~~pro-rated~~prorated portion of any LTIP award that is in progress on the date of termination, based on target, in alump-sum cash payment.

~~(ii)~~

Mr. Fibig’s severance payment in connection with any termination without Cause or for Good Reason that occurs within two years after a CiC will be a multiple of three times (3x) the sum of his annual base salary plus the greater of his (a) target AIP award for the year of termination and (b) the average AIP award paid to him for the three fiscal years prior to the termination, and such payments will be payable in a lump sum. In addition, all of Mr. Fibig's outstanding equity awards will vest in full at target;


~~(iii)~~	Mr. Fibig will be entitled to continuation of medical, dental, disability and life insurance coverage for 24 months in the case of termination without Cause or for Good Reason, whether or not in connection with a CiC.

Mr. Fibig’s severance payment in connection with any termination without Cause or for Good Reason that occurs within two years after a CiC will be a multiple of three times (3x) the sum of his annual base salary plus the greater of his (a) target AIP award for the year of termination and (b) the average AIP award paid to him for the three fiscal years prior to the termination, and such payments will be payable in a lump sum. In addition, all of Mr. Fibig’s outstanding equity awards will vest in full at target;

Mr. Fibig will be entitled to continuation of medical, dental, disability and life insurance coverage for 24 months in the case of termination without Cause or for Good Reason, whether or not in connection with a CiC;

Any termination by us without cause (as described below) or by Mr. Fibig for any reason requires prior written notice of (i) six months, if the termination occurs on or after the first anniversary but before the second anniversary of his date of employment, or (ii) 90 days, if the termination occurs on or after the second anniversary of his date of employment.

84IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Under Mr. Fibig’s letter agreement, “Cause” ~~means (i)~~ means:

willful and continued failure to perform substantially his duties with the Company (other than any such failure resulting from his incapacity due to physical or mental illness) after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to him by the Board which specifically identifies the manner in which he has not substantially performed his duties, and which provides a 20 day cure period; ~~(ii)~~

willful engagement in conduct which is not authorized by the Board or within the normal course of his business decisions and is known by him to be materially detrimental to our best interests or the best interests of any of our subsidiaries, including any misconduct that results in material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements under the Federal securities laws if such noncompliance results in an accounting restatement; ~~(iii)~~

willful engagement in illegal conduct or any act of serious dishonesty which adversely affects, or in the reasonable estimation of the Board, could in the future adversely affect his value, reliability or performance to our Company in a material manner (other than any act or failure to act based upon authority given by the Board or advice of counsel for the Company, which shall be presumed to be done in good faith and in the best interests of the Company); or ~~(iv)~~

his being indicted for or convicted of (or pleading guilty or nolo contendere to) a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, fraud, theft or financial impropriety.

Under Mr. Fibig’s letter agreement, “Good Reason” means any of the ~~following (i)~~ following:

any reduction in his base salary or target AIP bonus; ~~(ii)~~

an adverse change in his status or position as CEO (including as a result of a material diminution in his duties or responsibilities); ~~(iii)~~

required relocation to a principal place of employment outside of the New York City metropolitan area; or ~~(iv)~~

our failure to obtain an agreement from any successor to all or substantially all of our assets or business to assume and agree to perform his Employment Agreement within fifteen (15) days after a merger, consolidation, sale or similar transaction.

However, “Good Reason” will only exist if the CEO resigns from employment within 180 days after the occurrence, without his express written consent, of one of the events enumerated ~~in (i) - (iv)~~ above; provided he provide written notice within 90 days after the event allegedly constituting Good Reason, and the Company will have 30 days after such notice is given to cure.

~~Table of Contents~~

If Mr. Fibig’s employment terminates on account of death, disability or retirement, he (or his beneficiary or estate) is entitled to any unpaid base salary through the date of termination, any unpaid bonus earned with respect to any fiscal year ending on or preceding the date of termination, payable when bonuses are paid to other senior executives, apro-rata AIP bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, based on actual performance and payable when bonuses are paid to other senior executives, and all other payments, benefits or perquisites to which he may be entitled under the terms of the Company’s programs. Mr. Fibig will not be entitled to any payment (including any taxgross-up) respecting taxes he may owe under IRC Section 4999 ~~(so-called~~(so-called “golden parachute taxes”). The separation benefits payments are subject to Mr. Fibig’s delivery to us of an executed general release, resignation from all offices, directorships and fiduciary positions with us and continued compliance with restrictive covenants regardingnon-competition,non-solicitation, confidentiality, cooperation andnon-disparagement. Upon a termination of Mr. Fibig’s employment for any reason, thenon-competition andnon-solicitation covenants continue to apply for two years. If Mr. Fibig’s employment terminates prior to a CiC and he fails to comply with the restrictive covenants, the clawback provisions in the ESP apply.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 85

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Ms. Cornell

In connection with her separation from the Company, the Company and Ms. Cornell entered into a separation agreement and general release that specifies the terms of her departure from the Company and the benefits she is eligible to receive under the ESP. Subject to her compliance with the post-separation covenants set forth in the separation agreement, Ms. Cornell will receive a total of $2,554,825 in severance payments and benefits, consisting of (i) a severance payment of $1,364,160, less applicable withholdings, payable in regular installments over 18 months following her separation, (ii) a prorated portion of her AIP award for 2016 of $314,496, calculated and paid in accordance with the AIP and based on the achievement of thepre-established performance goals applicable to the 2016 AIP, (iii) a prorated portion of her LTIP awards for the LTIP award cycles in progress at a value of $628,009, payable 50% in cash and 50% in shares when such amounts otherwise become payable on the applicable LTIP payout date, (iv) a prorated portion of her 2015 and 2016 ECP awards at a value of $234,090, payable on the vesting date of such awards, and (v) continuation of medical, dental, disability and life insurance coverage for 18 months following her separation or until she obtains new employment providing similar benefits, with a value of $14,070. In addition, under the separation agreement, Ms. Cornell provided a general waiver and release of claims against the Company and is subject to certain restrictive covenants, including confidentiality,non-competition,non-solicitation andnon-disparagement.

Potential Payments ~~and Benefits~~ upon aTermination or Change in Control ~~and Various Types of Terminations~~

The following table shows the estimated payments and value of benefits that we would provide to each of our NEOs other than Ms. Cornell if the triggering events described in the heading of the table had occurred on December 31, ~~2015.~~

2016. Ms. Cornell is not included in the table as a result of her separation from our Company effective October 11, 2016. The severance payments and benefits received by Ms. Cornell are described above under “Other Separation Arrangements”.

We do not provide any additional benefits to our NEOs upon a voluntary resignation or termination for Cause. Certain assumptions made for purposes of presenting this information and certain amounts not reflected in the table are explained below or in the footnotes to the table.

For all cases, theper-share market price of our common stock is assumed to be ~~$119.64,~~$117.83, the actual closing price per share on the last trading day of ~~the year, December 31, 2015.~~2016. In preparing the estimates in this table, we have assumed that any CiC would also constitute a “change in ownership and control” for purposes of the golden parachute excise tax rules. All amounts included in the table are stated in the aggregate, even if the payments will be made on a monthly basis. Except as noted in footnote (7) of the table, these amounts do not include payments and benefits to the extent that they are provided on anon-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon termination of employment. The salary, AIP award and LTIP award otherwise payable to each NEO through December 31, ~~2015~~2016 is included in the Summary Compensation Table. In addition to the amounts set forth in the table below, in the event of a CiC, the aggregate balance held in our DCP for each of our NEOs who participate in that plan will be automatically accelerated and settled within five business days of the CiC, as opposed to the participant’s original deferral election. The amounts that would have been accelerated in the event of a CiC as well as, in all other cases, the amounts each of our NEOs who participate in that plan would have received according to the participant’s original deferral election, are shown in the Aggregate Balance at FiscalYear-End column of theNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table.

86IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

~~Table of Contents~~

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

Involuntary
Termination
Not for
Cause or Good Reason Prior
to or More
Than 2 Years
After a CiC

Termination
due to Death(1)

Separation
Due to
Retirement
or Disability
Prior to or
More Than
2 Years
After a CiC(2)

Not for Cause or
Good Reason
Termination
Within 2 Years
After a CiC

Separation
Due to
Retirement or
Disability
Within 2
Years
After a CiC(2)
Andreas Fibig
Salary $ 2,400,000
$ —
$ —
$ 3,600,000
(3) $ —
AIP 2,880,000
(4) —
—
4,320,000
(5) —
LTIP (6) 771,807
771,807
771,807
771,807
771,807
ECP Acceleration (7) 2,018,851
5,480,589
—
5,480,589
5,480,589
Medical Benefits (8) 58,990
—
—
58,990
—
Executive Death Benefit (9) —
2,400,000
—
—
—
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10) 16,471
—
—
24,706
—
Disability Insurance (11) —
—
180,000
—
180,000
Total $ 8,146,119
$ 8,652,396
$ 951,807
$ 14,256,092
$ 6,432,396
Alison A. Cornell
Salary $ 840,000
$ —
$ —
$ 1,120,000
$ —
AIP 325,874
(4) —
—
900,000
(5) —
LTIP (6) 42,626
42,626
42,626
42,626
42,626
ECP Acceleration (7) 85,756
357,932
—
357,932
357,932
Medical Benefits (8) 13,571
—
—
13,571
—
Executive Death Benefit (9) —
1,120,000
—
—
—
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10) 339
—
—
453
—
Disability Insurance (11) —
—
180,000
—
180,000
Total $ 1,308,166
$ 1,520,558
$ 222,626
$ 2,434,582
$ 580,558
Richard O’Leary
Salary $ 400,000
$ —
$ —
$ 600,000
$ —
AIP 220,603
(4) —
—
330,904
(5) —
LTIP (6) 86,870
86,870
86,870
86,870
86,870
ECP Acceleration (7) 780,607
1,296,728
—
1,296,728
1,296,728
Medical Benefits (8) 29,495
—
—
29,495
—
Executive Death Benefit (9) —
800,000
—
—
—
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10) 7,912
—
—
11,868
—
Disability Insurance (11) —
—
180,000
—
180,000
Total $ 1,525,487
$ 2,183,598
$ 266,870
$ 2,355,865
$ 1,563,598
Nicolas Mirzayantz
Salary $ 900,000
$ —
$ —
$ 1,200,000
—
AIP 720,000
(4) —
—
1,120,037
(5) —
LTIP (6) 263,886
263,886
263,886
263,886
263,886
ECP Acceleration (7) 3,904,113
5,660,181
—
5,660,181
5,660,181
Medical Benefits (8) 44,243
—
—
44,243
—
Executive Death Benefit (9) —
1,200,000
—
—
—
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10) 8,741
—
—
11,655
—
Disability Insurance (11) —
—
180,000
—
180,000
Total $ 5,840,983
$ 7,124,067
$ 443,886
$ 8,300,002
$ 6,104,067


	Involuntary Termination Not for Cause or Good Reason Prior to or More Than 2 Years After a CiC			Termination due to Death (1)		Separation Due to Retirement or Disability Prior to or More Than 2 Years After a CiC (2)		Involuntary Termination Not for Cause or Good Reason Within 2 Years After a CiC			Separation Due to Retirement or Disability Within 2 Years After a CiC (2)
Andreas Fibig
Salary	$	2,600,000		$	—	$	—	$	3,900,000	(3)	$	—
AIP		3,120,000	(4)		—		—		4,680,000	(5)		—
LTIP (6)		1,042,500			1,042,500		1,042,500		1,042,500			1,042,500
Equity (7)		3,712,624			7,428,828		—		7,428,828			7,428,828
Medical Benefits (8)		61,158			—		—		61,158			—
Executive Death Benefit (9)		—			2,600,000		—		—			—
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)		453			—		—		679			—
Disability Insurance (11)		—			—		180,000		—			180,000

Total	$	10,536,735		$	11,071,328	$	1,222,500	$	17,113,165		$	8,651,328
Richard O’Leary
Salary	$	750,000		$	—	$	—	$	1,000,000		$	—
AIP		366,393	(4)		—		—		488,525	(5)		—
LTIP (6)		102,617			102,617		102,617		102,617			102,617
Equity (7)		1,704,598			2,116,266		—		2,116,266			2,116,266
Medical Benefits (8)		45,869			—		—		45,869			—
Executive Death Benefit (9)		—			1,000,000		—		—			—
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)		11,999			—		—		15,999			—
Disability Insurance (11)		—			—		180,000		—			180,000

Total	$	2,981,476		$	3,218,883	$	282,617	$	3,769,275		$	2,398,883
Nicolas Mirzayantz
Salary	$	900,000		$	—	$	—	$	1,200,000		$	—
AIP		720,000	(4)		—		—		960,000	(5)		—
LTIP (6)		260,625			260,625		260,625		260,625			260,625
Equity (7)		1,782,995			2,827,881		—		2,827,881			2,827,881
Medical Benefits (8)		45,869			—		—		45,869			—
Executive Death Benefit (9)		—			1,200,000		—		—			—
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)		8,604			—		—		11,473			—
Disability Insurance (11)		—			—		180,000		—			180,000

Total	$	3,718,093		$	4,288,506	$	440,625	$	5,305,847		$	3,268,506
Matthias Haeni
Salary	$	787,500		$	—	$	—	$	1,050,000		$	—
AIP		630,000	(4)		—		—		840,000	(5)		—
LTIP (6)		260,625			260,625		260,625		260,625			260,625
Equity (7)		1,083,492			1,787,677		—		1,787,677			1,787,677
Medical Benefits (8)		20,664			—		—		20,664			—
Executive Death Benefit (9)		—			1,050,000		—		—			—
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)		6,869			—		—		9,159			—
Disability Insurance (11)		—			—		180,000		—			180,000

Total	$	2,789,150		$	3,098,302	$	440,625	$	3,968,125		$	2,228,302
Anne Chwat
Salary	$	712,500		$	—	$	—	$	950,000		$	—
AIP		427,500	(4)		—		—		570,000	(5)		—
LTIP (6)		146,429			146,429		146,429		146,429			146,429
Equity (7)		1,227,494			2,027,147		—		2,027,147			2,027,147
Medical Benefits (8)		45,869			—		—		45,869			—
Executive Death Benefit (9)		—			950,000		—		—			—
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10)		12,114			—		—		16,153			—
Disability Insurance (11)		—			—		180,000		—			180,000

Total	$	2,571,905		$	3,123,576	$	326,429	$	3,755,597		$	2,353,576

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 87

~~Table of Contents~~

Involuntary
Termination
Not for
Cause Prior
to or More
Than 2 Years
After a CiC

Termination
due to Death(1)

Separation
Due to
Retirement
or Disability
Prior to or
More Than
2 Years
After a CiC(2)

Not For Cause or
Good Reason
Termination
Within 2 Years
After a CiC

Separation
Due to
Retirement or
Disability
Within 2
Years
After a CiC(2)
Matthias Haeni
Salary $ 750,000
$ —
$ —
$ 1,000,000
$ —
AIP 600,000
(4) —
—
800,000
(5) —
LTIP (6) 263,886
263,886
263,886
263,886
263,886
ECP Acceleration (7) 902,800
1,505,084
—
1,505,084
1,505,084
Medical Benefits (8) 19,647
—
—
19,647
—
Executive Death Benefit (9) —
1,000,000
—
—
—
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10) 339
—
—
453
—
Disability Insurance (11) —
180,000
—
180,000
Total $ 2,536,672
$ 2,768,970
$ 443,886
$ 3,589,070
$ 1,948,970
Anne Chwat
Salary $ 697,500
$ —
$ —
$ 930,000
$ —
AIP 418,500
(4) —
—
679,775
(5) —
LTIP (6) 147,248
147,248
147,248
147,248
147,248
ECP Acceleration (7) 1,393,191
2,251,503
—
2,251,503
2,251,503
Medical Benefits (8) 44,243
—
—
44,243
—
Executive Death Benefit (9) —
930,000
—
—
—
Executive Death Benefit Cost (10) 11,984
—
—
17,976
—
Disability Insurance (11) —
—
180,000
—
180,000
Total $ 2,712,666
$ 3,328,751
$ 327,248
$ 4,070,745
$ 2,578,751

~~_____________________~~

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(1)

The amounts in this column represent payments made in the event of the death of the executive either prior to, within two years or more than two years after a CiC, assuming a termination date of December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. With respect to amounts shown in the AIP row, if the death of an executive occurred within two years of a CiC, this amount may change as it is the prorated amount of the ~~executive's~~executive’s target bonus in the year of termination.


(2)	Pursuant to the terms of the ESP, an executive who elects to retire after attaining age 62 is entitled to the benefits in this column (less any disability insurance proceeds).

(3)

Pursuant to the terms of our ESP, if severance payments are deemed to trigger the excise tax imposed by IRC Section 4999, the executive would receive the greater net after tax benefit of either (1) payment of the excise tax or (2) a reduction to cash severance to the ~~"safe harbor"~~“safe harbor” level so as not to trigger the excise tax. In Mr. ~~Fibig's~~Fibig’s case, payment of the excise tax results in the greater net after tax benefit to him.

(4)

This amount represents (i) for Mr. Fibig, 2.0x the greater of the average AIP award paid for performance in the three years preceding the year of the presumed December 31, ~~2015~~2016 termination (i.e., the three years ending December 31, ~~2014)~~2015) (or averaged over the lesser number of years during which the executive was eligible for AIP awards) or the ~~executive's~~executive’s target annual incentive under the AIP for ~~2015,~~2016, prorated for the number of active days of employment with the Company during the performance period; (ii) for Messrs. Mirzayantz, ~~and~~ Haeni and ~~Mses.~~O’Leary and Ms. Chwat, ~~and Cornell,~~ 1.5x the ~~executive's~~executive’s target annual incentive under the AIP for ~~2015 prorated for the number of active days of employment with the Company during the performance period; (iii) for Mr. O'Leary, 1.0x the executive's target annual incentive under the AIP for 2015~~2016 prorated for the number of active days of employment with the Company during the performance period. This amount does not take into account any actual AIP amounts paid for ~~2015,~~2016, which are set forth in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.

(5)

For ~~Mr. O'Leary, this amount represents 1.5x, for~~ Messrs. Mirzayantz, ~~and~~ Haeni and ~~Mses.~~O’Leary and Ms. Chwat ~~and Cornell~~ 2.0x, and Mr. Fibig 3.0x the greater of: (i) the average AIP award paid for performance in the three years preceding the year of the presumed December 31, ~~2015~~2016 termination (i.e., the three years ending December 31, ~~2014)~~2015) (or averaged over the lesser number of years during which the executive was eligible for AIP awards); or (ii) the ~~executive's~~executive’s target annual incentive under the AIP for ~~2015.~~2016. This amount does not take into account any actual AIP amounts paid for ~~2015,~~2016, which are set forth in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.

(6)

The amounts in this row are the ~~additional~~ LTIP amounts that would be payable as severance in cash with respect to the ~~2014-2016~~2015-2017 and ~~2015-2017~~2016-2018 LTIP cycles, ~~that would be paid in cash,~~ based on prorated target LTIP for the relevant LTIP cycles in progress. Prorated amounts are based on the number of days worked in each performance period divided by the total number of days in each performance period for each relevant LTIP cycle. This amount does not take into account the actual amounts paid out under the completed ~~2013-2015~~2014-2016 LTIP cycle, which are discussed in the narrative following the Grants of Plan-Based Award Table under the heading ~~"Long-Term~~“Long-Term Incentive Plan."”

~~Table of Contents~~

(7)

For termination due to involuntary termination not for cause or by the executive for good reason absent a CiC, this amount represents the value of equity that would continue to vest on a prorated basis. For termination due to death or disability more than two years prior to a CiC, the amounts in this row represent the aggregate value of RSU and PRS awards which would immediately vest upon occurrence of the termination event. For termination events within two years after a CiC, the amounts in this row represent the aggregatein-the-money value of the ~~options,~~ SSARs, RSUs, PRS and other equity awards which would become vested as a direct result of the CiC before the stated vesting date specified in the applicable equity award document. The calculation of these amounts does not ~~attribute any additional value to options based on their remaining exercise term and does not~~ discount the value of awards based on the portion of the vesting period elapsed at the date of the CiC. ~~These amounts also do not include any value for equity awards that, by their terms, are not accelerated and continue to vest.~~


(8)	Amounts in this row are the COBRA costs of medical and dental benefits for the covered period based on assumptions used for financial reporting purposes. Although our medical and dental insurance is generally available to our employees, only participants in our ESP, including our NEOs, would be entitled to have the benefits paid for by our Company.

88IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


(9)	The amounts in this row are the amounts that would be payable under our Executive Death Benefit Plan upon the death of the NEO.


(10)	The amounts in this row are the costs that we would incur to continue the Executive Death Benefit Plan for the NEO.


(11)	The amounts in this row are the amounts that would be payable under our disability insurance program upon the ~~NEO's~~NEO’s separation from employment due to long-term disability. This program is generally available to salaried employees.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 89

~~Table~~

In August 2015, the French government adopted a new law providing for the grant of ~~Contents~~RSUs with preferential tax treatment if certain requirements were satisfied (“French-Qualified RSUs”). In December 2016, the French government adopted further changes to this law under which French-Qualified RSUs may be granted (as modified in December 2016, the “Macron Law”). Pursuant to this law, employees receiving French-Qualified RSUs will not be subject to taxation at the time of vesting, but instead will be subject to taxation at the time the shares acquired pursuant to the French-Qualified RSUs are subsequently sold. Further, under the Macron Law, employer social contributions that were originally due at the time of grant of French-Qualified RSUs have been deferred to the date of vesting. Among the conditions for granting French-Qualified RSUs under the Macron Law is that the French-Qualified RSUs are granted pursuant to an equity incentive plan approved by shareholders after December 31, 2016.

Our 2015 SAIP provides that the Compensation Committee has the full discretionary authority to adopt rules and regulations for administration of the 2015 SAIP as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to satisfy the laws of other countries, and to allow fortax-preferred treatment of awards. In order to allow us to grant awards to employees in France in a tax preferential manner under the Macron Law, our Board has adopted the Rules of the International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan for Grants of Restricted Stock Unit Awards in France, which operates under the 2015 SAIP (the “FrenchSub-Plan”).

We are now asking our shareholders to approve the FrenchSub-Plan for the purpose of qualifying under the Macron Law in France, so that RSUs that are granted under the FrenchSub-Plan to individuals who are subject to taxation under French law may qualify for the specific tax treatment described under the Macron Law. The FrenchSub-Plan, including the 2015 SAIP, is set forth in Annex I to this proxy statement.

This proposal will not make any changes to the 2015 SAIP itself and will not increase the number of shares currently authorized for issuance under the 2015 SAIP.

Summary of the FrenchSub-Plan under the 2015 SAIP

This summary of the FrenchSub-Plan is a summary of the principal features of the FrenchSub-Plan and does not purport to be a complete description of all of the provisions of the FrenchSub-Plan. This summary is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the FrenchSub-Plan.

Awards under the FrenchSub-Plan

The FrenchSub-Plan provides for the grant of RSUs only; it does not provide for the grant of stock options, restricted stock awards, stock bonus awards, stock appreciation rights or other equity awards. We are not required under the Macron Law to grant French-Qualified RSUs in France. We may choose, at our discretion, to grantnon-qualified awards under the 2015 SAIP, but outside of the FrenchSub-Plan, to employees of our French subsidiaries depending on the circumstances.

Eligible Individuals

Any French employee of the Company or one of its qualifying French subsidiaries who, on the date of grant of the French-Qualified RSU, is either employed under the terms of an employment contract with a French qualifying entity or who is a corporate officer of a French qualifying entity is eligible to receive, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, French-Qualified RSUs, provided that he or she also satisfies the eligibility conditions of the 2015 SAIP. French-Qualified RSUs may not be issued to corporate officers of the French subsidiaries of the Company, other than to managing directors, unless the

Proposal 5 — Proposal to Approve a French Sub-Plan under the 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan

90IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 5 — PROPOSAL TO APPROVE A FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

corporate officer is employed by a French entity. Also, French-Qualified RSUs may not be issued to employees or corporate officers owning more than 10% of the Company’s share capital.

As of March 8, 2017 approximately 70 employees would qualify for French-Qualified RSUs under the FrenchSub-Plan.

Conditions of French-Qualified RSUs

French-Qualified RSUs may not vest and settle prior to the expiration of the minimum mandatory vesting period under French law. However, in the event of the death of a French holder of French-Qualified RSUs, such RSU holder’s heirs may request that the shares subject to the RSUs be transferred to them during thesix-month period following the RSU holder’s death and if such a request is made, the RSUs must vest in full and the shares be issued to the heirs. To the extent this request is not made within the six month period following the French-Qualified RSU holder’s death, the RSU is forfeited. In the event of disability, then outstanding RSUs will vest and becomenon-forfeitable immediately, and together with previously vested RSUs will be settled as promptly as practicable.

Shares issued pursuant to French-Qualified RSUs may be subject to a minimum mandatory holding period required under applicable law. This holding period continues to apply even if a holder of French-Qualified RSUs is no longer an employee of the Company (or a subsidiary of the Company) or a corporate officer of a French entity, except in the case of disability or death where this holding period no longer applies.

In the event of a change in capitalization or a corporate transaction, as set forth in our 2015 SAIP, adjustments to the terms and conditions of the French-Qualified RSUs (including the shares underlying them) may be made only in accordance with the terms of our 2015 SAIP and as may otherwise be required under applicable French legal, tax and social security rules.

In the event French-Qualified RSUs cease to be qualified due to changes to the terms and conditions of such RSUs, our Compensation Committee may lift, shorten or terminate certain restrictions applicable to the vesting or the sale of shares that had previously applied.

Notwithstanding any provision of our 2015 SAIP to the contrary (and except in the case of death and disability), French-Qualified RSUs are nontransferable.

Shares Available for Issuance under the 2015 SAIP and the FrenchSub-Plan

As of March 8, 2017, a total of 2,368,923 shares of our common stock were available for issuance under the 2015 SAIP and the FrenchSub-Plan. The approval of the FrenchSub-Plan will not increase the number of shares or awards available under the 2015 SAIP. The number of shares available for issuance under the 2015 SAIP and the FrenchSub-Plan is subject to adjustment to reflect stock splits, reorganizations and similar events; however, adjustment of French-Qualified RSUs under such circumstances may result in a loss of qualified status.

Material Tax Consequences

French-Qualified RSUs issued to French-resident employees subject to the French social security regime should be subject to 15.5% social security taxes on the value of such awards at the time of vesting, in contrast to currently being subject to a combined 18% social security tax rate. The vesting gain continues to be subject to progressive income tax rates (up to 45%) that employees pay upon ultimate sale of the shares received upon the settlement of French-Qualified RSUs. However, under the Macron Law, the taxable income subject to progressive income tax can be reduced by 50% or 65% if the shares are held for a specified number of years following vesting. The tax consequences of participating in the FrenchSub-Plan may vary with respect to individual situations and it should be noted that income tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof change frequently. Participants should rely upon their own tax advisors for advice concerning the specific tax consequences applicable to them, including the applicability and effect of state, local and foreign tax laws.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 91

PROPOSAL 5 — PROPOSAL TO APPROVE A FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

Our Board believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to enable the Company to have the authority to grant French-Qualified RSUs under the FrenchSub-Plan that would qualify for the income tax and social security tax treatment authorized under the Macron Law. If shareholders do not approve the FrenchSub-Plan under our 2015 SAIP, pursuant to which the FrenchSub-Plan is established, we will not be able to grant French-Qualified RSUs, but, we can continue to grant nonqualified RSUs and other equity awards to our service providers in France under our 2015 SAIP. However, French-resident employees will not have the tax benefits they would be entitled to under the Macron Law.

Summary of the 2015 SAIP

As noted above, this proposal does not make any changes to the 2015 SAIP itself and is limited to the Macron Law qualification for French law purposes. However, to comply with applicable law, the material terms of the 2015 SAIP are described below. This summary of the 2015 SAIP is a summary and does not purport to be a complete description of all of the provisions of the 2015 SAIP. This summary is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the 2015 SAIP set forth in Annex I to this proxy statement.

General

The purpose of the 2015 SAIP is to aid us in attracting, retaining, motivating and rewarding employees, consultants,non-employee directors and other selected service providers of the Company who contribute to the success of our Company, and to strengthen the mutuality of interests between these persons and our Company. The 2015 SAIP is designed to enable us to grant cash and equity-based awards, including performance-based awards that are intended to qualify as “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) (“Performance-Based Awards”).

Administration

The 2015 SAIP is administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has the authority to determine the individuals who may participate in the 2015 SAIP and the terms and conditions of their awards, interpret the 2015 SAIP, establish and revise rules and regulations relating to the 2015 SAIP and make any other determinations it believes necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2015 SAIP. The Compensation Committee may delegate the administration of the 2015 SAIP to employees or officers of the Company as it deems appropriate, except that no delegation may be made in the case of awards (i) intended to be qualified under Section 162(m) or (ii) made to individuals who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

Size of Share Pool; Shares Available

As of December 31, 2016, there were 2,715,923 shares remaining available for issuance under the 2015 SAIP. The shares to be delivered under the 2015 SAIP may be authorized but unissued shares of our common stock, treasury shares and/or shares purchased in the open market. The maximum number of shares available for grants of incentive stock options is 1,500,000. The closing price of a share of our common stock on the NYSE on March 8, 2017 was $124.28.

Individual Limits under the 2015 SAIP

An executive officer who is subject to the deductibility limitations of Section 162(m) may not be (i) granted Performance-Based Awards covering more than 1,000,000 shares during any calendar year (the “Annual Limit”) plus the amount of such executive officer’s unused Annual Limit as of the last day of the prior calendar year, and (ii) paid more than $5,000,000 for any Performance-Based Awards with respect to anyone-year performance period relating to such award. The Compensation Committee may not grant to any executive officer subject to the deductibility limitations of Section 162(m) more than three cash Performance-Based Awards with performance periods that are scheduled to either start or end in the same calendar year.

92IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 5 — PROPOSAL TO APPROVE A FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

The maximum number of shares that may be covered by equity-based awards granted to anon-employee director in any calendar year may not exceed 20,000 shares.

Shares Subject to Awards; Share Counting

Any shares underlying awards under the 2015 SAIP that are forfeited, canceled, returned to the Company or expire may not be used for the future grant of awards under the 2015 SAIP if such shares are (i) underlying an award that is ultimately settled in cash, (ii) withheld to settle a stock-settled SAR, (iii) tendered by the participant or withheld by the Company to pay the exercise price of an option, or (iv) tendered by the participant or withheld by the Company to pay the withholding taxes related to an award.

Eligibility

All employees of the Company and its affiliates, as well as the Company’snon-employee directors, consultants and selected service providers to the Company or its affiliates, as selected by the Compensation Committee, will be eligible to participate in the 2015 SAIP (“participants”). As of the date of this proxy statement, there are approximately 760 employees and service providers of the Company and its affiliates and 10non-employee directors of the Company who are eligible to participate in the 2015 SAIP.

Prohibition on Repricing

The 2015 SAIP does not permit the repricing of options or SARs, the exchange of underwater options or SARs for cash, or the lowering of the exercise price of an option or SAR following the date of grant without shareholder approval, provided that adjustments to the exercise price of an option or SAR in connection with certain corporate events described below will not be considered a repricing for these purposes.

Transferability

Unless otherwise provided in an award agreement, awards granted under the 2015 SAIP may not be transferred except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. During the participant’s lifetime, any options or awards may be exercised only by the participant or, if permissible under applicable law, by the participant’s guardian or legal representative.

Certain Adjustments

In the event of any change in the number or kind of outstanding shares of common stock of the Company by reason of a recapitalization, merger, consolidation,spin-off, combination, liquidation, extraordinary stock dividend or split, dissolution, repurchase or exchange of shares or similar corporate change, the Compensation Committee may, to the extent it deems appropriate, adjust the maximum aggregate number and type of shares with respect to which awards may be granted under the 2015 SAIP and the individual and aggregate limits under the 2015 SAIP. In the event of an increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of our common stock without payment or receipt of consideration by us, the Compensation Committee may, to the extent it deems appropriate, adjust outstanding awards as to the type of shares, number of shares and exercise price per share. In addition, in the event of certain corporate transactions, such as a dissolution, sale or merger of our Company, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to provide for the cancellation andcash-out of outstanding awards under the 2015 SAIP, or to provide for the exchange of such outstanding awards and to make certain equitable adjustments.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 93

PROPOSAL 5 — PROPOSAL TO APPROVE A FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

Change in Control

In the event of a change in control (as defined in the 2015 SAIP), unless otherwise provided in the participant’s award agreement or the ESP, if applicable, the Compensation Committee will determine the deemed level of achievement of the applicable performance goals with respect to any performance award as of the date of the change in control.

Generally, unless otherwise provided in the participant’s award agreement, or the ESP, if applicable, (i) if the acquirer does not assume the outstanding awards under the 2015 SAIP or (ii) if the acquirer assumes the outstanding awards under the 2015 SAIP and a participant’s employment is involuntarily terminated without cause (or for participants who participate in the ESP, the participant terminates employment for good reason), in either case, within the24-month period following a change in control:

any unvested options and SARs will immediately vest and remain exercisable for the period of time set forth in the applicable award agreement; and

the restrictions, limitations and conditions on other awards (including AIP, LTIP, RSUs, and ECP awards) will lapse and such awards will become fully vested (with respect to any performance awards, subject to the Compensation Committee’s determination with respect to performance as of the date of the change in control).

Additionally, the Compensation Committee or Board may provide for awards to be cancelled in exchange for a cash payment in connection with a change in control.

Term, Amendment and Termination

The 2015 SAIP has aten-year term from the date of approval by the Board, subject to shareholder approval, unless terminated earlier by the Board. Awards granted under the 2015 SAIP prior to its termination may remain outstanding beyond the termination date of the 2015 SAIP.

~~X. OTHER MATTERS~~The Board may amend, suspend, modify, discontinue or terminate the 2015 SAIP or revise, modify or amend any award at any time, but may not, without prior approval of our shareholders:

increase the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2015 SAIP or the number of shares that may be issued to any one participant;

extend the term of the 2015 SAIP or of options granted under the 2015 SAIP;

materially modify the eligibility criteria; or

take any other action that requires shareholder approval to comply with any applicable law, tax or regulatory requirement.

Types of Awards

The 2015 SAIP provides for the grant of cash and equity-based awards, including performance awards.

Cash and equity awards. The Compensation Committee may grant cash and equity-based or equity-related awards upon such terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee may impose. These awards may (i) involve the transfer of actual shares, either at the time of grant or after, or payment in cash or otherwise of amounts based on the value of our shares, (ii) be subject to performance and/or service-based conditions, (iii) be in the form of SARs, phantom stock, restricted stock, restricted stock

94IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 5 — PROPOSAL TO APPROVE A FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

units, performance shares, deferred share units or share-denominated performance units, (iv) be designed to comply with applicable laws of jurisdictions other than the United States and (v) be designed to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m).

Stock options. Options granted under the 2015 SAIP may be eithernon-qualified stock options or incentive stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the IRC. The exercise price of any option may not be less than the fair market value of our shares on the date the option is granted and may be paid in cash or in any other manner as may be determined by the Compensation Committee. The term of any options under the 2015 SAIP may not exceed 10 years from the date of grant. The Compensation Committee determines the terms and conditions of award of options.

Performance-based awards. The Compensation Committee may grant cash or equity-based awards to its executive officers that are intended to qualify as Performance-Based Awards. Performance-Based Awards vest or become exercisable upon the attainment of specific performance goals that arepre-established by the Compensation Committee and are related to one or more of the performance measures (described below) set forth in the 2015 SAIP. Within 90 days after the beginning of the performance period with respect to any Performance-Based Award, and in any case before 25% of the performance period has elapsed, the Compensation Committee will establish the performance goals for such performance period. Participants are only entitled to receive payment for a Performance-Based Award for any given performance period to the extent that suchpre-established performance goals for such award are satisfied. In determining the amount payable with respect to any individual Performance-Based Award, the Compensation Committee may reduce or eliminate (but not increase) the amount payable to a participant with respect to such award. The 2015 SAIP also provides the Compensation Committee with the discretion to grant, modify and administer Performance-Based Awards that do not qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m).

Thepre-established performance goals on which the payment or vesting of Performance-Based Awards depends must relate to one or more of any combination of the following performance measures: (i) earnings per share, net earnings per share or growth in such measures; (ii) net sales, sales, net revenues or revenues or growth in sales or revenues; (iii) earnings measures (including earnings before or after any or all of interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization or extraordinary or special items); (iv) income, net income, net income per share of common stock (basic or diluted) or growth in income; (v) cash flow (including, net cash provided by operations, cash flow in excess of cost of capital (discounted or otherwise), free cash flow, and cash flow return on capital) or growth in such measures; (vi) return measures, including return on assets (gross or net), return on investment, return on capital, return on equity, return on revenue or return on sales; (vii) economic profit or economic value created; (viii) gross profit or operating profit; (ix) gross margin, operating margin or profit margin or growth in such measures; (x) shareholder value creation measures, including price per share of common stock or total shareholder return; (xi) dividend payout levels, including as a percentage of net income; (xii) asset measures, including asset growth; (xiii) asset turnover, (xiv) sales measures; (xv) book value; (xvi) brand contribution; (xvii) market share or growth in market share; (xviii) unit volume, (xix) working capital amounts, including working capital as a percentage of customer sales; (xx) operational costs or cost controls and other expense targets, or a component thereof, or planning or forecasting accuracy; (xxi) supply chain achievements; (xxii) innovation as measured by a percentage of sales of new products; (xxiii) strategic plan development and implementation; or (xxiv) strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified market penetration, geographic business expansion goals, cost targets, total market capitalization, agency ratings, completion of capital and borrowing transactions, business retention, new product development, customer satisfaction and retention, employee development, satisfaction and retention, market penetration, management of employment practices and employee benefits, diversity, supervision of litigation, information technology, corporate social responsibility, customer growth, customer service, improvements in capital structure, debt leverage, expense management, operating efficiency, strategic planning, process reliability, product quality, regulatory compliance, risk mitigation, sustainability and environmental impact, and goals relating to acquisitions, divestitures or strategic partnerships or transactions.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 95

PROPOSAL 5 — PROPOSAL TO APPROVE A FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

The performance measures listed above may relate to the performance of the Company (or that of an affiliate, business group, business unit or division of the Company) and may be expressed as an amount, as an increase or decrease over a specified period, or as a relative comparison to the performance of other companies or a published or special index.

The measurement of the performance measures shall exclude the negative impact and include the positive impact of certain items that may occur during the performance period, including, without limitation, (i) unusual,non-recurring, or extraordinary items or expenses; (ii) charges for restructurings; (iii) discontinued operations; acquisitions or divestitures; (iv) the cumulative effect of changes in accounting treatment; (v) changes in tax laws, accounting standards or principles or other laws or regulatory rules affecting reporting results; (vi) any impact of impairment of tangible or intangible assets; (vii) any impact of the issuance or repurchase of equity securities and/or other changes in the number of outstanding shares of any class of the Company’s equity securities; (viii) any gain, loss, income, or expense attributable to acquisitions or dispositions of stock or assets; (ix) stock-based compensation expense; (x) asset write-downs,in-process research and development expense; (xi) gain or loss from all or certain claims and/or litigation and insurance recoveries; (xii) foreign exchange gains and losses; (xiii) any impact of changes in foreign exchange rates and any changes in currency; (xiv) a change in the Company’s fiscal year; (xv) litigation legal fees; (xvi) pension expenses and (xvii) any other items, each determined in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and as identified in the Company’s audited financial statements.

For all awards granted under the 2015 SAIP that are subject to performance conditions but are not intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), performance goals may be based on one or more of the above performance measures or any other criteria that the Compensation Committee deems appropriate.

Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a summary of the effect of U.S. federal income taxation on the participants in the 2015 SAIP and the Company. This summary does not discuss the income tax laws of any other jurisdiction (including state or local jurisdictions) in which the participant may reside or be subject to tax.

Stock Appreciation Rights. Generally, the recipient of a stand-alone SAR will not recognize taxable income at the time the stand-alone SAR is granted. The value received by an employee (in cash or stock) from the exercise or settlement of a SAR will be taxed as ordinary income to the employee at the time it is received. In general, there will be no federal income tax deduction allowed to the Company upon the grant or termination of SARs. However, upon the exercise or settlement of a SAR, the Company will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income the recipient is required to recognize as a result of the exercise or settlement.

Stock Awards/Performance Awards. No income will be recognized at the time of grant by the recipient of a stock award or performance award if such award is subject to contingencies or restrictions that qualify as substantial risks of forfeiture under the applicable provisions of the IRC. Generally, at the time the contingencies or restrictions are satisfied or terminate with respect to a stock award, the then fair market value of the stock or the amount of cash received will constitute ordinary income to the employee. Subject to the applicable provisions of the IRC, a deduction for federal income tax purposes will be allowable to the Company in an amount equal to the compensation realized by the employee.

Incentive Stock Options. An incentive stock option results in no taxable income to the optionee or a deduction to the Company at the time it is granted or exercised. However, upon exercise, the excess of the fair market value of the shares acquired over the option exercise price is an item of adjustment in computing the alternative minimum taxable income of the optionee, if applicable. If the optionee holds the stock received as a result of an exercise of an incentive stock option for the later of two years from the date of the grant or one year from the date of exercise, then the gain realized on disposition of the shares

96IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 5 — PROPOSAL TO APPROVE A FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

is treated as a long-term capital gain. If the shares are disposed of during this period, however (i.e., a “disqualifying disposition”), then the optionee will include into income, as compensation for the year of the disposition, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares, upon exercise of the option over the option exercise price (or, if less, the excess of the amount realized upon disposition of the shares over the option exercise price). Any additional gain or loss recognized upon the disposition will be recognized as a capital gain or loss by the optionee. In the event of a disqualifying disposition, the Company will be entitled to a deduction, in the year of such a disposition, in an amount equal to the amount includible in the optionee’s income as compensation. The optionee’s tax basis in the shares acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option is equal to the option price paid, plus any amount includible in his or her income as a result of a disqualifying disposition.

Non-Qualified Stock Options. Anon-qualified stock option results in no taxable income to the optionee or deduction to the Company at the time it is granted. An optionee exercising anon-qualified stock option will, at that time, realize taxable compensation in the amount equal to the excess of the then fair market value of the shares over the option exercise price. Subject to the applicable provisions of the IRC, the Company will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes in the year of exercise in an amount equal to the taxable compensation realized by the optionee. The optionee’s tax basis in shares received upon exercise is equal to the sum of the option exercise price plus the amount includible in his or her income as compensation upon exercise.

Any gain (or loss) upon subsequent disposition of the shares will be a long or short-term capital gain to the optionee (or loss), depending upon the holding period of the shares. If anon-qualified option is exercised by tendering previously owned shares in payment of the option price, then, instead of the treatment described above, the following will apply: a number of new shares equal to the number of previously owned shares tendered will be considered to have been received in atax-free exchange; the optionee’s basis and holding period for such number of new shares will be equal to the basis and holding period of the previously owned shares exchanged. The optionee will have compensation income equal to the fair market value on the date of exercise of the number of new shares received in excess of such number of exchanged shares; the optionee’s basis in such excess shares will be equal to the amount of such compensation income, and the holding period in such shares will begin on the date of exercise.

Tax Treatment of Awards toNon-Employee Directors and to Employees Outside the United States

The grant and exercise or settlement of options and awards under the 2015 SAIP tonon-employee directors and to employees outside the United States may be taxed (including income and/or employment taxes) on a different basis.

YOUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF A FRENCH

SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 97

LOGO

What am I voting on?

At the 2017 Annual Meeting you will be asked to vote on the following proposals. Our Board recommendation for each of these proposals is set forth below.


Proposal		Board Recommendation
1. To elect eleven members of the Board of Directors, each to hold office for aone-year term expiring at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.		FOR each Director Nominee
2. To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2017 fiscal year.		FOR
3. To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers in 2016, which we refer to as “Say on Pay.”		FOR
4. To vote, on an advisory basis, on the frequency of votes on executive compensation.		FOR the option of every one year
5. To approve a FrenchSub-Plan under the 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan		FOR

We also will consider other business that properly comes before the meeting in accordance with New York law and ourBy-Laws.

Who can vote?

Holders of our common stock at the close of business on March 8, 2017, are entitled to vote their shares at the 2017 Annual Meeting. As of March 8, 2017, there were 78,972,864 shares of common stock issued, outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of common stock issued and outstanding is entitled to one vote.

What constitutes a quorum, and why is a quorum required?

We are required to have a quorum of shareholders present to conduct business at the meeting. The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on the record date (39,486,433 shares) will constitute a quorum, permitting us to conduct the business of the meeting. Abstentions and brokernon-votes are counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum. Shares of common stock for which we have received executed proxies will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum at the meeting, regardless of how or whether such shares are voted on any specific proposal.

What is the difference between a “shareholder of record” and a “street name” holder?

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, you are considered a “shareholder of record” or a “registered shareholder” of those shares. In this case, your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) has been sent to you directly by us.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trust or other nominee or custodian (each, a “Broker”), including shares you may own as a participant in one of our 401(k) plans, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares, which are held in “street name.” A Notice has been

98IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

Information About the Meeting

INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING

forwarded to you by or on behalf of your Broker, who is considered the shareholder of record of those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your Broker how to vote your shares by following the instructions for voting set forth in the Notice.

How do I vote?

If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote:

via Internet;

by telephone;

by mail, if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials; or

in person at the meeting.

Detailed instructions for Internet and telephone voting are set forth in the Notice, which contains instructions on how to access our proxy statement, annual report and shareholder notice online, and the printed proxy card.

If your shares are held in one of our 401(k) plans, your proxy will serve as a voting instruction for the trustee of the 401(k) plan, who will vote your shares as you instruct. To allow sufficient time for the trustee to vote, your voting instructions must be received by 11:59 pm Eastern Daylight Time on May 2, 2017. If the trustee does not receive your instructions by that date, the trustee will vote the shares you hold through the 401(k) plan in the same proportion as those shares in the 401(k) plan for which voting instructions were received.

If you are a beneficial owner, you must follow the voting procedures of your Broker.

What are the requirements to elect the director nominees and to approve each of the proposals in this proxy statement?


Proposal		Vote Required
1. Election of Directors		Majority of Votes Cast

2. Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		Majority of Votes Cast

3. Say on Pay		Majority of Votes Cast

4. Say on Frequency		The Option that Receives the Greatest Number of Votes Cast

5. Approval of FrenchSub-Plan		Majority of Votes Cast

Under ourBy-Laws, in an uncontested election of directors, as we have this year, a majority of votes cast is required in order for a director to be elected, which means that a nominee must receive a greater number of votes “FOR” his or her election than votes “AGAINST” in order to be elected. Abstentions are not counted as votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” a director nominee.

Under ourBy-Laws, the votes cast “FOR” must exceed the votes cast “AGAINST” the ratification of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2017 fiscal year. Abstentions are not counted as votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” this proposal.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 99

INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING

Proposals 3 and 4 are advisory votes. This means that while we ask shareholders to approve a resolution regarding Say on Pay and to vote on the Say on Frequency Proposal, these are not actions that require shareholder approval. If a majority of votes are cast “FOR” the Say on Pay proposal, we will consider the proposal to be approved. Abstentions are not counted as votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” this proposal. For the Say on Frequency proposal, we will consider that the shareholders have recommended whichever option (one, two or three years) that receives the greatest number of votes cast. Abstentions will have no effect on the outcome of Proposals 3 and 4.

Under ourBy-laws, the votes cast “FOR” must exceed the votes cast “AGAINST” to approve the FrenchSub-Plan under the 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan. This proposal is also subject to NYSE shareholder approval rules. Under the NYSE rules, abstentions are counted as votes cast and therefore will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” Proposal 5.

What if I am a beneficial owner and I do not give the nominee voting instructions?

If you are a beneficial owner and your shares are held in “street name,” the Broker is bound by the rules of the NYSE regarding whether or not it can exercise discretionary voting power for any particular proposal if the Broker has not received voting instructions from you. Brokers have the authority to vote shares for which their customers do not provide voting instructions on certain routine matters. A brokernon-vote occurs when a Broker returns a proxy but does not vote on a particular proposal because the Broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the proposal and has not received specific voting instructions for the proposal from the beneficial owner of the shares. Brokernon-votes are considered to be present at the meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but are not counted as votes cast.

The table below sets forth, for each proposal on the ballot, whether a Broker can exercise discretion and vote your shares absent your instructions and, if not, the impact of such brokernon-vote on the approval of the proposal.


Proposal	Can Brokers Vote Absent Instructions?	Impact of Broker Non-Vote
1. Election of Directors	No	None

2. Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	Yes	Not Applicable

3. Say on Pay	No	None

4. Say on Frequency	No	None

5. Approval of FrenchSub-Plan	No	None

What if I sign and return my proxy without making any selections?

If you sign and return your proxy without making any selections, your shares will be voted “FOR” each of the director nominees, “FOR” Proposals 2, 3 and 5 and for the “1 year” option in Proposal 4. If other matters properly come before the meeting, the proxy holders will have the authority to vote on those matters for you at their discretion. If your shares are held in “street name,” see the question above on how to vote your shares.

How do I change my vote?

A shareholder of record may revoke his or her proxy by giving written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary before the meeting, by delivering a later-dated proxy (either in writing, by telephone or over the Internet), or by voting in person at the 2017 Annual Meeting.

If your shares are held in “street name,” you may change your vote by following your Broker’s procedures for revoking or changing your proxy.

100IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING

What shares are covered by my proxy card?

Your proxy reflects all shares owned by you at the close of business on March 8, 2017. For participants in our 401(k) plans, shares held in your account as of that date are included in your proxy.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?

If you receive more than one proxy card, it means that you hold shares in more than one account. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, you should sign and return each proxy card. Alternatively, if you vote by telephone or via the Internet, you will need to vote once for each proxy card and voting instruction card you receive.

Who can attend the 2017 Annual Meeting?

Only shareholders and our invited guests are permitted to attend the 2017 Annual Meeting. To gain admittance, you must bring a form of personal identification to the meeting, where your name will be verified against our shareholder list. If a Broker holds your shares and you plan to attend the meeting, you should bring a brokerage statement showing your ownership of the shares as of the record date or a letter from the Broker confirming such ownership, and a form of personal identification. If you wish to vote your shares that are held by a Broker at the meeting, you must obtain a proxy from your Broker and bring such proxy to the meeting.

If I plan to attend the 2017 Annual Meeting, should I still vote by proxy?

Yes. Casting your vote in advance does not affect your right to attend the 2017 Annual Meeting. If you send in your proxy card and also attend the meeting, you do not need to vote again at the meeting unless you want to change your vote. Written ballots will be available at the 2017 Annual Meeting for shareholders of record.

How can I listen to the live audio webcast of the 2017 Annual Meeting?

You may listen to a live audio webcast of the 2017 Annual Meeting at www.iff.com. The webcast will allow you to listen to the Annual Meeting, but shareholders accessing the 2017 Annual Meeting through the webcast will not be considered present at the 2017 Annual Meeting and will not be able to vote their shares through the webcast or ask questions. If you plan to listen to the live audio webcast, then please submit your vote prior to the 2017 Annual Meeting using one of the methods described under “How do I vote?” above. An archived copy of the webcast will be available at www.iff.com following the 2017 Annual Meeting. Registration to listen to the webcast will be required. We have included our website address for reference only. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 101

LOGO

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports with the SEC relating to their common stock ownership and changes in such ownership, and to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based on a review of our records and certain written representations received from our executive officers and directors, we believe that during the year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to directors, executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders were complied with on a timely basis, except ~~(i)~~ a Form 4 reporting ~~a grant~~stock equivalent units under the DCP resulting from deferral of ~~RSUs to Richard O'Leary~~retainer fees for David Epstein was not timely filed due to an administrative error, and (ii) one Form 4 for each of Angelica Cantlon, Anne Chwat, Andreas Fibig, Nicolas Mirzayantz, and Richard O’Leary reporting the grant of stock equivalent units under the Company’s deferred compensation plan was not timely filed due to an administrative error.

Proxy Solicitation Costs

We will pay the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited on our behalf by directors, officers or employees in person, by telephone, by facsimile or by electronic mail. We have retained Georgeson Inc. to assist in proxy solicitation for a fee of $8,500 plus expenses. We will reimburse banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their costs in sending proxy materials to the beneficial owners of our common stock.

Shareholder Proposals

In order for a shareholder proposal or proposed director nomination to be considered for inclusion in our proxy materials for next year’s annual meeting of shareholders, the Secretary of our Company must receive the written proposal no later than November ~~17, 2016.~~20, 2017. Under Article I, Section 3 of ourBy-Laws, in order for a shareholder to submit a proposal or to nominate any director at next year’s annual meeting of shareholders, the shareholder must give written notice to the Secretary of our Company not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of this year’s annual meeting of shareholders provided next year’s annual meeting is called for on a date that is within 30 days before or after such anniversary date. Assuming that next year’s annual meeting is held on schedule, we must receive written notice of an intention to introduce a nomination or other item of business at that meeting between January ~~2, 2017~~3, 2018 and February ~~1, 2017.~~2, 2018. The notice must also meet all other requirements contained in ourBy-Laws, including the requirement to contain specified information about the proposed business or the director nominee and the shareholder making the proposal.

As of the date of this proxy statement, we do not know of any matters to be presented at the ~~2016~~2017 Annual Meeting other than those described in this proxy statement. If any other matters should properly come before the meeting, proxies in the enclosed form will be voted on those matters in accordance with the judgment of the person or persons voting the proxies, unless otherwise specified.

102IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

OTHER MATTERS

~~Table of Contents~~

Shareholder Communications

Shareholders and other parties interested in communicating directly with the Lead Director, thenon-management directors as a group or all directors as a group may do so by writing to the Lead Director or thenon-management directors or the Board, ~~of Directors,~~ in each case, c/o General Counsel and Secretary, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., 521 West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019. All communications should include the name, address, telephone number and email address (if any) of the person submitting the communication and indicate whether the person is a shareholder of our Company.

The Board has approved a process for handling correspondence received by our Company on behalf of the Lead Director, thenon-management directors as a group or all directors as a group. Under that process, the General Counsel reviews all such correspondence and maintains a log of, and forwards to the appropriate Board member, correspondence that is relevant to (i) the functions of the Board or committees thereof or (ii) other significant matters involving our Company. The General Counsel may screen frivolous or unlawful communications and commercial advertisements. Directors may review the log maintained by the General Counsel at any time.

Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are immediately brought to the attention of our internal auditor and handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee with respect to such matters.

Electronic Delivery

This year we again have elected to take advantage of the SEC’s rule that allows us to furnish proxy materials to you online. We believe electronic delivery will expedite shareholders’ receipt of materials, while lowering costs and reducing the environmental impact of our ~~2016~~2017 Annual Meeting by reducing printing and mailing of full sets of materials. We mailed the Notice containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement and annual report online on or about March ~~17, 2016.~~20, 2017. If you would like to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials, the Notice contains instructions on how to receive a paper copy.

Householding

We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this procedure, shareholders of record who have the same address and last name will receive only one copy of our Notice, unless one or more of these shareholders notifies us that they wish to continue receiving individual copies. This procedure will reduce our printing costs and postage fees.

If you are eligible for householding, but you and other shareholders of record with whom you share an address currently receive multiple copies of the Notice, or if you hold stock in more than one account, and in either case you wish to receive only a single copy of the Notice for your household, please contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, by calling1-800-542-1061, or by forwarding a written request addressed to Broadridge Financial Solutions, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717.

If you participate in householding and wish to receive a separate copy of the Notice, or if you do not wish to participate in householding and prefer to receive separate copies of the Notice in the future, please contact Broadridge Financial Solutions as indicated above. Beneficial shareholders can request information about householding from their nominee.

Available Information

We will furnish without charge to each person whose proxy is being solicited, upon request of any such person, a copy of the ~~2015~~2016 Annual Report as filed with the SEC, including the financial statements and schedules thereto, but not the exhibits. In addition, such report is available, free of charge, through the ~~Investor -~~ Investor—Financials & ~~Filings -~~ Filings—SEC Filings link on our website at, ~~www.iff.com~~.www.iff.com. A request for a copy of such report should be directed to International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., 521 West 57th Street, New York, NY 10019, Attention: Investor Relations. A copy of any exhibit to the Form10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 will be forwarded following receipt of a written request to Investor Relations.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

103

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Exhibit A~~

~~International Flavors and Fragrances Inc.~~

~~GAAP~~


2016 Sales Growth

Total Company
Reported Sales Growth	3%
Currency Impact	2%
Currency Neutral Sales Growth	5%

2016 Adjusted Operating Profit
(IN THOUSANDS U.S. $)

Total Company
As Reported Operating Profit	$567,356
Restructuring and Other Charges	322
Operational Improvement Initiative Costs	2,402
Acquisition Related Costs	12,195
Legal Charges	48,518
Gain on Sale of Asset	(7,818)

Adjusted Operating Profit	$622,975


2016 Adjusted Earnings Per Share
(IN U.S. $)

Total Company
As Reported EPS	5.05
Operational Improvement Initiative Costs	0.02
Acquisition Related Costs	0.10
Legal Charges	0.39
Gain on Sale of Asset	(0.06)

Adjusted EPS	5.51	1

¹The sum does not foot due to ~~Non-GAAP Reconciliations~~

~~(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)~~

REVENUE GROWTH

2013 2014 2015
Total Company
   Reported Sales Growth 5% 5% -2%
   Currency Impact 0% 0% 7%
Currency Neutral Sales Growth 5% 5% 5%

ADJUSTED OPERATING PROFIT

(IN THOUSANDS U.S. $) 2013 2014 2015
Total Company
As Reported Operating Profit 516,339 592,321 588,347
   Restructuring and Other Charges 7,401 6,398 7,594
   Operational Improvement Initiative Costs 3,672 2,541 1,115
   Spanish Tax Charges 13,011 — —
   Accelerated Contingent Consideration — — 7,192
   Acquisition Related Costs — — 18,342
   Spanish Capital Tax Charge Reversal — — (10,530)
Adjusted Operating Profit 540,423 601,260 612,060

ADJUSTED EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)

(IN U.S. $) 2013 2014 2015
Total Company
As Reported EPS 4.29 5.06 5.16
   Restructuring and Other Charges Tax Benefit 0.06 0.05 0.07
   Operational Improvement Initiative Costs 0.03 0.02 0.01
   Spanish Tax Charges 0.19 (0.05) —
   Accelerated Contingent Consideration — — 0.09
   Acquisition Related Costs — — 0.15
   Tax Settlement — — (0.13)
   Gain on Asset Sale (0.10) — —
   Spanish Capital Tax Charge Reversal — — (0.09)
Adjusted EPS
4.46¹
5.08
5.25¹

¹ The sum of the 2013 and 2015 adjusted EPS does not foot due to rounding.

rounding.

The Company usesnon-GAAP financial measures such as currency neutral sales (which eliminates the effects that result from translating its international sales in U.S. dollars), Adjusted Operating Profit and Adjusted EPS (which excludes the impact from our restructuring and other charges, operational improvement initiative costs, acquisition related costs, legal charges offset by favorable tax settlements and gain on sale of asset) as the Company believes that thesenon-GAAP financial measures provide investors with an overall perspective of theperiod-to-period performance of our core business. Such information is supplemental to information presented in accordance with GAAP and is not intended to represent a presentation in accordance with GAAP. Thesenon-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

Exhibit A — GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations

104IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

EXHIBIT A—GAAP TO NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS


Adjusted Net Income

(IN MILLIONS U.S. $)	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
As Reported Net Income	267	254	354	415	419	405
Restructuring and Other Charges	9	1	5	4	5	0
Operational Improvement Initiative Costs	-	-	3	2	1	2
Patent Litigation Settlement	30	-	-	-	-	-
Gain on Asset Sale	-	-	(9)	(0)	-	(5)
Accelerated Contingent Consideration	-	-	-	-	7	-
Acquisition Related Costs	-	-	-	-	12	8
Tax Settlements	-	-	-	-	(10)	-
Spanish Tax Settlement	-	72	-	-	-	-
Spanish Capital Tax Charge Reversal	-	-	-	-	(8)	-
Spanish Tax Charges	-	-	15	(4)	-	-
Legal Charges/Credits	-	-	-	-	-	31

AdjustedNetIncome	306	328 *	368	416 *	426	441

*Item does not foot due to rounding.


Adjusted Total Payout Ratio as Percentage of Adjusted Net Income

(IN MILLIONS U.S. $)	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
DividendPayment	90	131	87	133	159	185
Adjustment Due to Timing of Payment	-	(28)	28	-	-	-
AdjustedDividendPayment	90	103	115	133	159	185
Share Repurchases	-	-	51	88	122	127
Adjusted Total Payout as Percentage of Net Income	90	103	166	221	281	312

Adjusted Net Income Payout	29%	31%	45%	53%	66%	71%

The Company uses non-GAAP financial measures such as Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Net Income Payout (which excludes the impact of our restructuring and other charges, operational improvement initiative costs, ~~and charges,~~patent litigation settlement, gain on asset sale, accelerated contingent consideration, acquisition related costs tax settlements, Spanish capital tax charge reversal, Spanish tax ~~charge/reversal, tax settlements,~~charges and ~~acquisition related costs)~~legal charges/credits) as the Company believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide investors with an overall perspective of the period-to-period performance of our core business. Such information is supplemental to information presented in accordance with GAAP and is not intended to represent a presentation in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT 105

~~Table of Contents~~

RULES OF THE

INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.

2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

FOR GRANTS OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARDS

IN FRANCE

1.	Introduction.

(a) The Board of Directors (the“Board”)of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (the“Company”) has established the 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, as amended (the“Plan”) for the benefit of certain employees of the Company and its affiliates, including its Frenchaffiliates (each a“French Entity”), of which the Company holds directly or indirectly at least 10% of the outstanding share capital. A copy of the Plan is provided in Appendix 1.

(b) Sections 4 and 33 of the Plan authorize the Compensation Committee of the Board (the“Committee”) to adopt such rules and regulations (including asub-plan to the Plan) as the Committee deems necessary or appropriate to implement the Plan in any jurisdiction outside the U.S.

(c) The Committee has determined that it is advisable to establish specific rules for the purpose of permitting restricted stock units granted to employees of a French Entity to qualify for the specific tax and social security treatment available for such grants in France. The Committee, therefore, intends to establish asub-plan of the Plan (the “FrenchSub-Plan”) for the purpose of granting RSUs that qualify for the specific tax and social security treatment in France applicable to shares granted for no consideration under Sections L.225-197-1 to L.225-197-6 of the French Commercial Code, as amended (the“French-Qualified RSUs”), to qualifying employees of a French Entity who are residents in France for French tax purposes and/or subject to the French social security regime (the“French Participants”).

Under the FrenchSub-Plan, French Participants will be granted RSUs only as defined in Section 2(d) hereunder. The provisions of the Plan permitting the grant of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other awards are not applicable to grants made under the FrenchSub-Plan.

2.	Definitions.

Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Plan. In addition, the terms set forth below shall have the following meanings for purposes of grants made under the FrenchSub-Plan:

(a) The term“Award Agreement” shall mean an agreement, in a form approved by the Committee from time to time, including, without limitation, written or electronic form, entered into by a French Participant and the Company, evidencing the grant of French-Qualified RSUs. The Award Agreement may, but need not, be executed or acknowledged by the Company and/or the French Participant.

Annex I — French Sub-Plan Under the 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT I-1

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

(b) The term“Closed Period” shall be as provided for by Section L.225-197-1 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, and as interpreted by the French administrative guidelines, and shall mean:

(i) ten quotation days preceding and three quotation days following the disclosure to the public of the consolidated financial statements or the annual statements of the Company; or

(ii) any period during which the corporate management of the Company possesses confidential information which could, if disclosed to the public, significantly impact the quotation of the shares of Common Stock, until ten quotation days after the day such information is disclosed to the public.

If the French Commercial Code is amended after adoption of this FrenchSub-Plan to modify the definition and/or the applicability of the Closed Periods to French-Qualified RSUs, such amendments shall become applicable to any French-Qualified RSUs granted under the FrenchSub-Plan, to the extent required or permitted by French law.

(c) The term“Disability” means disability as defined under categories 2 and 3 of Section L.341-4 of the French Social Security Code, as amended.

(d) The term“Restricted Stock Unit” or “RSU” shall mean a promise by the Company to issue, in the future, one share of Common Stock for each RSU granted to a French Participant, subject to specific terms and conditions. RSUs granted under the FrenchSub-Plan do not provide voting or dividend rights and no dividends or dividend equivalents will be paid or credited on any unvested RSUs.

(e) The term“Vesting Date” shall mean the date on which a French Participant is entitled to receive shares of Common Stock underlying French-Qualified RSUs. The Committee may provide in the applicable Award Agreement that shares of Common Stock underlying French-Qualified RSUs will be issued only on a date occurring after the Vesting Date.

3.	Eligibility to Participate.

(a) Subject to Section 3(c) below, any French Participant who, on the date of grant and to the extent required under French law, is either employed under the terms and conditions of an employment contract (“contrat de travail”) with a French Entity or who is a corporate officer of a French Entity (subject to Section 3(b) below), shall be eligible to receive, at the discretion of the Committee, French-Qualified RSUs under the FrenchSub-Plan provided he or she also satisfies the eligibility conditions of Section 5 of the Plan.

(b) French-Qualified RSUs may not be issued to corporate officers of a French Entity, other than the managing directors (i.e., Président du Conseil d’Administration, Directeur Général, Directeur Général Délégué, Membre du Directoire, Gérant de Sociétés par actions), unless the corporate officer is employed by a French Entity, as defined by French law and is otherwise eligible to receive RSUs under Section 5 of the Plan.

(c) French-Qualified RSUs may not be issued under the FrenchSub-Plan to employees or corporate officers owning more than ten percent (10%) of the Company’s share capital or to individuals other than employees and corporate officers of a French Entity. Grants of French-Qualified RSUs under the FrenchSub-Plan shall not result in any French Participant owning more than ten percent (10%) of the Company’s share capital.

(d) The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock underlying French-Qualified RSUs shall not exceed 10% of the Company’s share capital.

I-2IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

4.	Conditions of the French-Qualified RSUs.

(a)Vesting of French-Qualified RSUs. The first Vesting Date of RSUs shall not occur prior to the expiration of the minimum mandatory vesting period applicable to French-Qualified RSUs under Section L.225-197-1 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, the relevant sections of the French Tax Code or the French Social Security Code, as amended. However, notwithstanding the above, in the event of the death or disability of a French Participant, all of his or her outstanding French-Qualified RSUs shall vest and the shares of Common Stock underlying French-Qualified RSUs shall become issuable as set forth in Section 5 of the FrenchSub-Plan.

(b)Holding of Shares of Common Stock. The shares of Common Stock issued upon vesting of French-Qualified RSUs granted to French Participants may be subject to a minimum mandatory holding period pursuant to Section L.225-197-1 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, or the relevant sections of the French Tax Code and French Social Security Code, as amended, to benefit from the specific French tax and social security regime, even if the French Participant is no longer an employee or corporate officer of a French Entity, the Company or any other affiliate.

In addition to this restriction on the sale or transfer of shares of Common Stock issued to French Participants, the shares of Common Stock may not be sold or transferred during a Closed Period, so long as Closed Periods are applicable to shares of Common Stock underlying French-Qualified RSUs.

(c)Managing Director. To the extent required for French-Qualified RSUs granted by the Company, specific holding periods for the shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to the French-Qualified RSUs shall be imposed in the relevant Award Agreement for French Participants who qualify as a managing director of the French Entity under French law (as defined in Section 3(b) above).

(d)French Participant’s Account. The shares of Common Stock issued to a French Participant pursuant to French-Qualified RSUs shall be recorded in the name of the French Participant in an account with the Company, a broker, or in such other manner as the Company may otherwise determine to ensure compliance with applicable law, including any required holding periods applicable to French-Qualified RSUs.

5.	Death and Disability.

In the event of termination of a French Participant’s status as a French Participant due to death, all French-Qualified RSUs held by the French Participant at the time of his or her death (whether vested or unvested at the time of death) shall immediately become transferable to the French Participant’s heirs. The Company shall issue the underlying shares of Common Stock to the French Participant’s heirs only if the heirs request such issuance within six months following the death of the French Participant. If shares are not requested by the heirs within suchsix-month period, any outstanding French-Qualified RSUs will be forfeited. The French Participant’s heirs shall not be subject to the minimum mandatory holding period set forth in Section 4(b) of this FrenchSub-Plan, if any.

If a French Participant ceases to be employed by the Company or a French entity by reason of his or her disability, French-Qualified RSUs then outstanding but not previously vested, will vest and becomenon-forfeitable immediately, and such French-Qualified RSUs, together with any then outstanding French-Qualified RSUs that previously vested, will be settled as promptly as practicable. The French Participant shall not be subject to the minimum mandatory holding period set forth in Section 4(b) above, if any.

6.	Adjustments upon certain Changes affecting the Company.

In the event of a corporate transaction as set forth in Section 10 or 11 of the Plan, adjustments to the terms and conditions of French-Qualified RSUs or underlying shares of Common Stock may be made only in

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT I-3

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

accordance with the Plan and pursuant to applicable French legal and tax rules. Nevertheless, the Committee, at its discretion, may determine to make adjustments in the case of a transaction for which adjustments are not authorized under French law, in which case, the RSUs may no longer qualify as French-Qualified RSUs.

Assumption or substitution of the RSUs in the case of a corporate transaction as well as an acceleration of vesting or the holding period, if any, or any other mechanism implemented upon a corporate transaction, or in any other event, may result in the RSUs no longer being eligible for the specific French tax and social security treatment.

7.	Disqualification of French-Qualified RSUs.

If the terms and conditions of outstanding French-Qualified RSUs are modified or adjusted due to any requirements under the applicable laws of incorporation of the Company, or by decision of the Company’s shareholders, the Board or the Committee, the RSUs may no longer qualify as French-Qualified RSUs. If the RSUs no longer qualify as French-Qualified RSUs, the Board or Committee may, in its sole discretion, determine to lift, shorten or terminate certain restrictions applicable to the vesting or to the transfer of the shares of Common Stock underlying the RSUs which had been imposed under the FrenchSub-Plan and/or in the Award Agreement delivered to the French Participant in order to achieve the specific tax treatment for French-Qualified RSUs.

In the event that any RSUs or underlying shares of Common Stock no longer qualify for the specific tax treatment pursuant to Sections L.225-197-1 to L.225-197-6 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, the holder of such RSUs shall be ultimately responsible for all taxes and/or social security contributions that he or she is required to pay in connection with such RSUs or underlying shares of Common Stock.

8.	Employment Rights.

The adoption of this FrenchSub-Plan shall not confer upon the French Participants or any employee of a French Entity, any employment rights and shall not be construed as a part of any employment contracts that a French Entity has with its employees or create any employment relationship with the Company.

9.	Non-Transferability.

Except in the case of death and disability, French-Qualified RSUs shall not be assigned or transferred to any third party. In addition, French-Qualified RSUs may vest only for the benefit of the French Participant during his or her lifetime.

10.	Interpretations.

It is intended that RSUs granted under the FrenchSub-Plan shall qualify for the specific tax and social security treatment applicable to RSUs granted under Sections L.225-197-1 to L.225-197-6 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, and in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth by French tax and social security laws. The terms of the FrenchSub-Plan shall be interpreted accordingly and in accordance with the relevant guidelines published by French tax and social security administrations and subject to the fulfilment of legal, tax and reporting obligations, if applicable. However, certain corporate transactions, and certain modifications or changes may impact the qualification of the RSUs and underlying shares of Common Stock for the specific regime in France.

11.	Amendments.

Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Committee reserves the right to amend or terminate the FrenchSub-Plan at any time in accordance with applicable French law.

12.	Effective Date and Term of the FrenchSub-Plan.

The FrenchSub-Plan shall be effective as of the date of its approval by the Company’s Shareholders.

I-4IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

Appendix 1

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.

2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan

As amended on February 7, 2017

1.	Purpose of the Plan

The purpose of the 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan is to aid the Company (as defined below) in attracting, retaining, motivating and rewarding employees, consultants,non-employee directors and other selected service-providers who contribute to the success of the Company, by authorizing Incentive Awards (as defined below) to incentivize such individuals to perform at the highest level, to strengthen the mutuality of interests between such individuals and the Company’s shareholders and, in general, to further the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

2.	Definitions

As used in the Plan (as defined below) or in any instrument governing the terms of any Incentive Award granted under the Plan, the following definitions apply to the terms indicated below:

(a) “Accounting Forfeiture Event” has the meaning set forth in Section 32.

(b) “Affiliate” means, with respect to a specified person, a person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the specified person.

(d) “Award Agreement” means an agreement, in a form approved by the Committee from time to time, including, without limitation, written or electronic, entered into by a Participant (as defined below) and the Company, evidencing the grant of an Incentive Award under the Plan.

(e) “Board” or “Board of Directors” means the Board of Directors of IFF (as defined below).

(f) “Cash Incentive Award” means an award granted to a Participant pursuant to Section 8.

(g) “Cause” has the meaning defined in the Award Agreement, the ESP if the Participant is a participant in the ESP, in any employment or severance agreement between the Company and the Participant then in effect or, if none, as defined under the severance policy applicable to the Participant at the time of the Participant’s termination of Employment, if any, or if no such definition exists, the meaning as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

(h) A “Change in Control” shall be deemed to have occurred if, after the Effective Date, there shall have occurred any of the following:

(i) any Person (as defined below) becomes the “beneficial owner,” as such term is defined in Rule13d-3 under the Exchange Act (as defined below), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 40% or more of the combined Voting Power (as defined below) of the Company’s then outstanding Voting Securities (as defined below), other than beneficial ownership by the Company, any employee benefit plan of the Company or any Person organized, appointed or established pursuant to the terms of any such benefit plan; or

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT I-5

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

(ii) individuals who at the Effective Date (as defined below) constitute a majority of the Board (the “Incumbent Directors”) cease to constitute a majority of the Board for any reason; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to the Effective Date whose election or nomination for election to the Board was approved by a vote of at leasttwo-thirds of the Incumbent Directors then on the Board (either by a specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as a nominee for director without objection to such nomination) shall be an Incumbent Director; provided, however, that no individual shall be an Incumbent Director if such individual is initially elected or nominated as a director of the Company as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to directors or as a result of any other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies by or on behalf of any person other than the Board; or

(iii) the consummation of:

(A) A merger, consolidation, reorganization or similar transaction with or into the Company or in which securities of the Company are issued, as a result of which the holders of the outstanding Voting Securities of the Company immediately before such event own, directly or indirectly, immediately after such event less than 60% of the combined Voting Power of the outstanding Voting Securities of the parent entity resulting from, or issuing its Voting Securities as part of, such event;

(B) A complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company; or

(C) The sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company (on a consolidated basis) to any Person other than (x) the Company, (y) an employee benefit plan (or a trust forming a part thereof) maintained by the Company or (z) a Person whose Voting Securities immediately following such sale or disposition will be owned by the holders of the outstanding Voting Securities of the Company immediately prior thereto, in substantially the same proportions.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, no payment or settlement of any Incentive Award that constitutes“non-qualified deferred compensation” within the meaning of section 409A of the Code (as defined below) shall be made solely upon the occurrence of a Change in Control to the extent such Change in Control does not also qualify as a “change in control event” within the meaning of Treasury Regulation§1.409A-3(i)(5)(i) and such payment or settlement shall occur on its otherwise scheduled payment and/or settlement date(s).

(i) “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and all regulations, interpretations, and administrative guidance issued thereunder.

(j) “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors or such other committee as the Board of Directors shall appoint from time to time to administer the Plan or to otherwise exercise and perform the authority and functions assigned to the Committee under the terms of the Plan.

(k) “Common Stock” means International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.’s common stock, par value 12.5 cents per share, or any other security into which the common stock shall be changed pursuant to the adjustment provisions of Section 10.

(l) “Company” means IFF and all of its Affiliates, collectively (and any successors or assigns thereto).

I-6IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

(m) “Confidential Information” has the meaning set forth in Section 32.

(n) “Covenant Forfeiture Event” has the meaning set forth in Section 32.

(o) “Covered Employee” means each Participant who is an executive officer (within the meaning of Rule3b-7 under the Exchange Act) of IFF.

(p) “Deferred Compensation Plan” means any plan, agreement, or arrangement maintained by the Company from time to time that provides opportunities for deferral of compensation, including, without limitation, the International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan.

(q) “Disabled” or “Disability” means, unless otherwise set forth in the Participant’s Award Agreement or any employment agreement between the Company and the Participant then in effect, a condition that entitles the Participant to long term disability benefits under any applicable Company disability plan, any successor plan, or as defined under any applicable local laws, rules, or regulations.

(r) “Early Retirement” means, unless otherwise set forth in the Participant’s Award Agreement, the termination of the Participant’s Employment at the election of the Participant after attaining age 55 plus ten years of service to the Company.

(s) “Effective Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 30.

(t) “Employment” means the period during which an individual is providing services to the Company as an employee,non-employee director, consultant, or other service provider, as applicable. “Employed” shall have a correlative meaning.

(u) “ESP” means the International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. Executive Severance Policy, as amended and restated from time to time.

(v) “Excess Compensation” has the meaning set forth in Section 32.

(w) “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(x) “Fair Market Value” means, with respect to a share of Common Stock, unless otherwise set forth in the Award Agreement, as of the applicable date of determination, the closing price as reported on the date of determination on the principal national securities exchange in the United States on which shares of Common Stock are then traded. In the event that the price of a share of Common Stock shall not be so reported, the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. With respect to the grant of an Incentive Award, the date of determination shall be the trading day on the date on which the Incentive Award is granted, or if such date is not a trading day, the immediately subsequent day on which the market is open for trading. With respect to the exercise of an Incentive Award, the date of determination shall be the date a notice of exercise is received by the Company or its designee, as applicable, or if such date is not a trading day, the immediately subsequent day on which the market is open for trading. With respect to Section 32, Fair Market Value shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

(y) “Forfeiture Event” has the meaning set forth in Section 32.

(z) “Good Reason” has the meaning defined in the Award Agreement, the ESP if the Participant is a participant in the ESP, or in any employment or severance agreement between the Company and the Participant then in effect.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT I-7

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

(aa) “IFF” means International Flavors and Fragrances Inc., a New York corporation.

(bb) “Incentive Award” means one or more Stock Incentive Awards and/or Cash Incentive Awards, collectively.

(cc) “Normal Retirement” means, unless otherwise set forth in the Participant’s Award Agreement, the termination of the Participant’s Employment at the election of the Participant after attaining age 62 or such earlier “Normal Retirement” date under the terms of the applicable Company pension or retirement plan.

(dd) “Option” means a stock option to purchase shares of Common Stock granted to a Participant pursuant to Section 6.

(ee) “Other Stock-Based Award” means an award granted to a Participant pursuant to Section 7.

(ff) “Participant” means an employee, consultant,non-employee director or other selected service provider of the Company who is eligible to participate in the Plan and to whom one or more Incentive Awards have been granted pursuant to the Plan and have not been fully settled or cancelled and, following the death of any such Person, his or her successors, heirs, executors and administrators, as the case may be.

(gg) “Performance-Based Award” means any Incentive Award pursuant to which any compensation paid is intended to be Performance-Based Compensation.

(hh) “Performance-Based Compensation” means compensation that satisfies the requirements of section 162(m) of the Code for “qualified performance-based compensation.”

(ii) “Performance Measures” has the meaning set forth in Section 9.

(jj) “Performance Percentage” means, with respect to a Performance-Based Award, the factor determined pursuant to a Performance Schedule (as defined below) that is to be applied to the Target Award (as defined below) and that reflects actual performance in respect of the applicable Performance Measure(s) compared to the Performance Target (as defined below).

(kk) “Performance Period” means, with respect to a Performance-Based Award, the period of time during which the applicable Performance Target(s) must be met in order to determine the degree of payout and/or vesting with respect to such Performance-Based Award. Different Performance-Based Awards may have overlapping Performance Periods.

(ll) “Performance Schedule” means, with respect to a Performance-Based Award, a schedule or other objective method for determining the applicable Performance Percentage to be applied to the Target Award.

(mm) “Performance Target” means, with respect to a Performance-Based Award, the performance goals and objectives relating to the applicable Performance Measures for such Performance-Based Award, as established by the Committee in accordance with Section 9.

(nn) “Person” means a “person” as such term is used in sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act, including any “group” within the meaning of section 13(d)(3) under the Exchange Act.

(oo) “Plan” means the International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, as it may be amended from time to time.

I-8IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

(pp) “Plan Period” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.

(qq) “Prior Plans” means the Company’s (i) 2010 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, (ii) 2000 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, and (iii) 2000 Supplemental Stock Award Plan.

(rr) “Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

(ss) “Stock Incentive Award” means an Option or Other Stock-Based Award granted pursuant to the terms of the Plan.

(tt) “Target Award” means, with respect to a Performance-Based Award, the target payout amount for such a Performance-Based Award.

(uu) “Voting Power” means the number of votes available to be cast (determined by reference to the maximum number of votes entitled to be cast by the holders of Voting Securities, or by the holders of any Voting Securities for which other Voting Securities may be convertible, exercisable, or exchangeable, upon any matter submitted to shareholders where the holders of all Voting Securities vote together as a single class) by the holders of Voting Securities.

(vv) “Voting Securities” means any securities or other ownership interests of an entity, which entitle, or which may entitle, Persons holding such securities or other ownership interests to vote on matters submitted to such holders generally (whether or not entitled to vote in the general election of directors), or securities or other ownership interests which are convertible into, or exercisable in exchange for, such Voting Securities, whether or not subject to the passage of time or any contingency.

3.	Stock Subject to the Plan and Limitations on Cash Incentive Awards

(a) Stock Subject to the Plan

The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be covered by Incentive Awards granted under the Plan shall not exceed the sum of (i) 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock and (ii) any shares of Common Stock that become available in connection with the cancellation, forfeiture, or expiration of awards issued and outstanding as of the Effective Date under the Prior Plans and (iii) any shares of Common Stock that remain available for issuance, as of the Effective Date, under the Prior Plans. Out of such aggregate, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be covered by Options that are designated as “incentive stock options” within the meaning of section 422 of the Code shall not exceed 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock. The maximum number of shares referred to in the preceding sentences of this Section 3(a) shall in each case be subject to adjustment as provided in Section 10 and the following provisions of this Section 3. Shares of Common Stock issued under the Plan may be authorized and unissued shares, treasury shares, shares purchased by the Company in the open market, or any combination of the preceding categories as the Committee determines in its sole discretion. The Committee may determine that Incentive Awards may be granted that relate to more shares of Common Stock than the aggregate remaining available under the Plan so long as the number of shares of Common Stock in respect of Incentive Awards that vest or are settled does not exceed the number of shares of Common Stock then available under the Plan.

For purposes of the preceding paragraph, shares of Common Stock covered by Incentive Awards shall only be counted as used to the extent they are actually issued and delivered to a Participant (or such Participant’s permitted transferees as described in the Plan) pursuant to the Plan. If shares of Common Stock are issued subject to conditions which may result in the forfeiture, cancellation, return to the Company or expiration of such shares, any portion of the shares forfeited, cancelled, returned or which expire shall be treated as not issued pursuant to the Plan and shall again be available for issuance hereunder.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT I-9

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

In addition, if (x) an Incentive Award is settled for cash or if shares of Common Stock are withheld to pay the exercise price of an Option, settle a stock-settled stock appreciation right or to satisfy any tax withholding requirement in connection with an Incentive Award, the shares issued (if any) in connection with such settlement, the shares in respect of which the Incentive Award was cash-settled, and the shares withheld, will be deemed issued for purposes of determining the number of shares of Common Stock that are available for issuance under the Plan and (y) shares of Common Stock owned by a Participant (or such Participant’s permitted transferees as described in the Plan) are tendered (either actually or through attestation) to the Company in payment of any obligation in connection with an Incentive Award, the number of shares tendered shall not be added to the number of shares of Common Stock that are available for issuance under the Plan.

Shares of Common Stock covered by Incentive Awards granted pursuant to the Plan in connection with the assumption, replacement, conversion, or adjustment of outstanding equity-based awards in the context of a corporate acquisition or merger (within the meaning of section 303A.08 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual), shall not count as issued under the Plan for purposes of this Section 3. In addition, shares of Common Stock available for issuance under certain plans acquired in corporate acquisitions and mergers that may be issued in connection with certain post-transaction grants of Incentive Awards under the Plan (subject to the requirements of section 303A.08 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual) shall not be counted as issued under the Plan for purposes of this Section 3.

(b) Individual Award Limits

Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 10, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be covered by Performance-Based Awards granted under the Plan to any Covered Employee in any calendar year shall not exceed 1,000,000shares (the “Annual Limit”) plus the amount of such Covered Employee’s unused Annual Limit as of the last day of the prior calendar year.

The amount of each Cash Incentive Award payable to any Covered Employee for any Plan Period shall not exceed (i) $5,000,000 for any Cash Incentive Award where the Plan Period is a calendar year and (ii) $5,000,000 per calendar year where the Plan Period is greater than a calendar year. For purposes of the preceding sentence “Plan Period” shall mean one or more calendar years as the Committee may determine, with respect to which any Cash Incentive Award may be payable under the Plan. The Committee may not grant to any Covered Employee more than three Cash Incentive Awards with Plan Periods that are scheduled to either start or end in the same calendar year.

Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 10, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be covered by Incentive Awards granted under the Plan to anynon-employee director in any calendar year shall not exceed 20,000 shares.

4.	Administration of the Plan

The Plan shall be administered by a Committee of the Board of Directors consisting of two or more persons, each of whom qualifies as a“non-employee director” (within the meaning of Rule16b-3 promulgated under section 16 of the Exchange Act), an “outside director” (within the meaning of Treasury Regulation section1.162-27(e)(3)) and as “independent” as required by the NYSE or any security exchange on which the Common Stock is listed, in each case if and to the extent required by applicable law or necessary to meet the requirements of such rule, section, or listing requirement at the time of determination. The Committee shall, consistent with the terms of the Plan, from time to time designate those individuals who shall be granted Incentive Awards under the Plan and the amount, type, and other terms and conditions of such Incentive Awards. All of the powers and responsibilities of the Committee under the Plan may be delegated by the Committee, in writing, to any subcommittee thereof, in which case the acts of such subcommittee shall be deemed to be acts of the Committee hereunder. The Committee may also from time to time authorize a subcommittee consisting of one or more members of the Board of Directors (including members who are employees of the Company) or employees of the

I-10IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

Company to grant Incentive Awards to persons who are not “executive officers” of the Company (within the meaning of Rule16a-1 under the Exchange Act), subject to such restrictions and limitations as the Committee may specify and to the requirements of New York Business Corporation Law section 505.

The Committee shall have full discretionary authority to administer the Plan, including discretionary authority to interpret and construe any and all provisions of the Plan and any Award Agreement thereunder, and to adopt, amend, and rescind from time to time such rules and regulations for the administration of the Plan, including rules and regulations established to satisfy applicable foreign laws and/or qualify for preferred tax treatment under applicable foreign tax laws, as the Committee may deem necessary or appropriate. Decisions of the Committee shall be final, binding, and conclusive on all parties. For the avoidance of doubt, the Committee may exercise all discretion granted to it under the Plan in anon-uniform manner among Participants.

The Committee may delegate the administration of the Plan to one or more officers or employees of the Company, and such administrator(s) may have the authority to execute and distribute Award Agreements, to maintain records relating to Incentive Awards, to process or oversee the issuance of Common Stock under Incentive Awards, to interpret and administer the terms of Incentive Awards, and to take such other actions as may be necessary or appropriate for the administration of the Plan and of Incentive Awards under the Plan, provided that in no case shall any such administrator be authorized (i) to grant Incentive Awards under the Plan (except in connection with any delegation made by the Committee pursuant to the first paragraph of this Section 4), (ii) to take any action inconsistent with section 409A of the Code, or (iii) to take any action inconsistent with applicable provisions of the New York Business Corporation Law. Any action by any such administrator within the scope of its delegation shall be deemed for all purposes to have been taken by the Committee and, except as otherwise specifically provided, references in this Plan to the Committee shall include any such administrator. The Committee and, to the extent it so provides, any subcommittee, shall have sole authority to determine whether to review any actions and/or interpretations of any such administrator, and if the Committee shall decide to conduct such a review, any such actions and/or interpretations of any such administrator shall be subject to approval, disapproval, or modification by the Committee.

On or after the date of grant of an Incentive Award under the Plan, the Committee may (i) accelerate the date on which any such Incentive Award becomes vested, exercisable, or transferable, as the case may be, (ii) extend the term of any such Incentive Award, including, without limitation, extending the period following a termination of a Participant’s Employment during which any such Incentive Award may remain outstanding, (iii) waive any conditions to the vesting, exercisability, or transferability, as the case may be, of any such Incentive Award or (iv) provide for the payment of dividends or dividend equivalents with respect to any such Incentive Award;provided, that the Committee shall not have any such authority to the extent that the grant of such authority would cause any tax to become due under section 409A of the Code. The Company shall pay any amount payable with respect to an Incentive Award in accordance with the terms of such Incentive Award, provided that the Committee may, in its discretion, defer the payment of amounts payable with respect to an Incentive Award subject to and in accordance with the terms of a Deferred Compensation Plan.

Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, without approval of the Company’s shareholders, the Company shall not amend or replace previously granted Options or stock appreciation rights in a transaction that constitutes a “repricing,” (within the meaning of section 303A.08 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual and any other formal or informal guidance issued by the NYSE) which for this purpose also means any of the following or any other action that has the same effect: (i) lowering the exercise price of an Option or stock appreciation right after it is granted, (ii) any other action that is treated as a repricing under United States generally accepted accounting principles, or (iii) canceling an Option or stock appreciation right at a time when its exercise price exceeds the Fair Market Value of the underlying shares of Common Stock, in exchange for another Option or stock appreciation right, shares of restricted Common Stock, other Incentive Awards, cash or other property;provided,however, that the foregoing transactions shall not be deemed a repricing if pursuant to an adjustment or other action authorized under Section 10.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT I-11

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

No member of the Committee shall be liable for any action, omission, or determination relating to the Plan, and IFF shall indemnify and hold harmless each member of the Committee and each other director or employee of the Company to whom any duty or power relating to the administration or interpretation of the Plan has been delegated, against any cost or expense (including counsel fees) or liability (including any sum paid in settlement of a claim with the approval of the Committee) arising out of any action, omission, or determination relating to the Plan, unless, in either case, such action, omission, or determination was taken or made by such member, director, or employee in bad faith and without reasonable belief that it was in the best interests of the Company.

5.	Eligibility

The Persons who shall be eligible to receive Incentive Awards pursuant to the Plan shall be those employees,non-employee directors, consultants, and other selected service providers of the Company whom the Committee shall select from time to time, including officers of the Company, whether or not they are directors. Furthermore, any individual who has agreed to accept Employment by, or provide services to, the Company shall be deemed to be eligible to receive Incentive Awards hereunder as of the date of such acceptance of Employment or provision of services; provided that the grant of any Incentive Awards under the Plan shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion and further provided that vesting, exercise or settlement of Incentive Awards granted to such individuals are conditioned upon such individual actually becoming an employee of or service provider to, the Company.

Options

The Committee may from time to time grant Options on such terms as it shall determine, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Plan. The Award Agreement shall clearly identify such Option as either an “incentive stock option” within the meaning of section 422 of the Code or as anon-qualified stock option.

(a) Exercise Price

The exercise price per share of Common Stock covered by any Option shall be not less than one hundred percent of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date on which such Option is granted, other than assumptions in accordance with a corporate acquisition or merger as described in Section 3.

(b) Term and Exercise of Options

(1) The Committee shall determine the term of each Option, provided that in no event shall the term of any Option exceed a period of ten years from the date of grant. Each Option shall become vested and exercisable on such date or dates, during such period and for such number of shares of Common Stock as shall be determined by the Committee on or after the date such Option is granted;provided,however, that each Option shall be subject to earlier termination, expiration, or cancellation as provided in the Plan or the Award Agreement.

(2) Each Option shall be exercisable in whole or in part;provided,however that no partial exercise of an Option shall be for an aggregate exercise price of less than $1,000. The partial exercise of an Option shall not cause the expiration, termination, or cancellation of the remaining portion thereof.

(3) An Option shall be exercised by such methods and procedures as the Committee determines from time to time, including without limitation through net physical settlement or other method of cashless exercise.

I-12IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

The terms of any incentive stock option granted under the Plan shall comply in all respects with the provisions of section 422 of the Code.

7.	Other Stock-Based Awards

The Committee may from time to time grant equity-based or equity-related Incentive Awards not otherwise described herein in such amounts and on such terms and conditions as it shall determine, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, each such Other Stock-Based Award may (i) involve the transfer of actual shares of Common Stock to Participants, either at the time of grant or thereafter, or payment in cash or otherwise of amounts based on the value of shares of Common Stock, (ii) be subject to performance-based and/or service-based conditions, (iii) be in the form of stock appreciation rights, phantom stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, deferred share units, or share-denominated performance units, (iv) be designed to comply with applicable laws of jurisdictions other than the United States and (v) be designed to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation;provided, that each Other Stock-Based Award shall be denominated in, or shall have a value determined by reference to, a number of shares of Common Stock that is specified at the time of the grant of such Incentive Awards. Nothing in this Plan is intended to limit the Committee’s discretion to adopt performance conditions with respect to any Stock Incentive Award that is not intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation.

8.	Cash Incentive Awards

The Committee may from time to time grant Cash Incentive Awards on such terms and conditions as it shall determine, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan. Cash Incentive Awards may be settled in cash or in other property, including shares of Common Stock, provided that the term “Cash Incentive Award” shall exclude any Option or Other Stock-Based Award. Nothing in this Plan is intended to limit the Committee’s discretion to adopt performance conditions with respect to any Cash Incentive Award that is not intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation.

9.	Performance-Based Compensation

The Committee may grant Incentive Awards that are intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation. Nothing in this Plan is intended to limit the Committee’s discretion to adopt performance measures, goals, targets and other terms and conditions with respect to any Incentive Award that is not a Performance-Based Award. Furthermore, nothing in this Plan shall be construed to require the Committee to grant any Incentive Award intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation. The Committee may, subject to the terms of the Plan, amend any previously granted Performance-Based Award in a way that disqualifies it as Performance-Based Compensation. This Section 9 describes the terms of Performance-Based Awards.

(a) Calculation

The amount payable with respect to a Performance-Based Award shall be determined in any manner permitted by section 162(m) of the Code.

(b) Discretionary Reduction

Unless otherwise specified in the Award Agreement, the Committee may, in its discretion, reduce or eliminate the amount payable to any Participant with respect to a Performance-Based Award, based on such factors as the Committee may deem relevant, but the Committee may not increase any such amount above the amount established in accordance with the relevant Performance Schedule. For purposes of clarity, the Committee may exercise the discretion provided for by the foregoing sentence in anon-uniform manner among Participants.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT I-13

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

The performance goals upon which the payment or vesting of any Performance-Based Award (other than Options and stock appreciation rights) depends shall (a) be objective business criteria and shall otherwise meet the requirements of section 162(m) of the Code, including the requirement that the level or levels of performance targeted by the Committee result in the achievement of performance goals being “substantially uncertain” at the time of grant and (b) relate to one or more of the following measures (collectively the “Performance Measures”): (i) earnings per share, net earnings per share or growth in such measures; (ii) net sales, sales, net revenues or revenues or growth in sales or revenues; (iii) earnings measures, (including earnings before or after any or all of interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization or extraordinary or special items); (iv) income, net income, net income per share of Common Stock (basic or diluted) or growth in income; (v) cash flow (including net cash provided by operations, cash flow in excess of cost of capital (discounted or otherwise), free cash flow, and cash flow return on capital) or growth in such measures; (vi) return measures, including return on assets (gross or net), return on investment, return on capital, return on equity, return on revenue or return on sales; (vii) economic profit or economic value created; (viii) gross profit or operating profit; (ix) gross margin, operating margin or profit margin or growth in such measures; (x) shareholder value creation measures, including price per share of Common Stock or total shareholder return; (xi) dividend payout levels, including as a percentage of net income; (xii) asset measures, including asset growth; (xiii) asset turnover, (xiv) sales measures; (xv) book value, (xvi) brand contribution, (xvii) market share or growth in market share, (xviii) unit volume, (xix) working capital amounts, including working capital as a percentage of customer sales; (xx) operational costs or cost controls and other expense targets, or a component thereof, or planning or forecasting accuracy; (xxi) supply chain achievements; (xxii) innovation as measured by a percentage of sales of new products; (xxiii) strategic plan development and implementation; or (xxiv) strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified market penetration, geographic business expansion goals, cost targets, total market capitalization, agency ratings, completion of capital and borrowing transactions, business retention, new product development, customer satisfaction and retention, employee development, satisfaction and retention, market penetration, management of employment practices and employee benefits, diversity, supervision of litigation and information technology, corporate social responsibility, customer growth, customer service, improvements in capital structure, debt leverage, expense management, operating efficiency, strategic planning process reliability, product quality, regulatory compliance, risk mitigation, sustainability and environmental impact and goals relating to acquisitions, divestitures or strategic partnerships or transactions.

A Performance Measure (i) may relate to the performance of the Participant, the Company, IFF, any Affiliate, any business group, business unit, or other subdivision of the Company, or any combination of the foregoing, as the Committee deems appropriate and (ii) may be expressed as an amount, as an increase or decrease over a specified period, as a relative comparison to the performance of a group of comparator companies or a published or special index, or any other measure of the selected performance criteria, as the Committee deems appropriate.

The measurement of any Performance Measure shall exclude the negative impact and include the positive impact of certain items that may occur during the Performance Period, including, without limitation, the following:

unusual,non-recurring, or extraordinary items or expenses; charges for restructurings; discontinued operations; acquisitions or divestitures; the cumulative effect of changes in accounting treatment; changes in tax laws, accounting standards or principles or other laws or regulatory rules affecting reporting results; any impact of impairment of tangible or intangible assets; any impact of the issuance or repurchase of equity securities and/or other changes in the number of outstanding shares of any class of the Company’s equity securities; any gain, loss, income, or expense attributable to acquisitions or dispositions of stock or assets; stock-based compensation expense; asset write-downs,in-process research and development expense; gain or loss from all or certain claims and/or litigation and insurance recoveries; foreign exchange gains

I-14IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

and losses; any impact of changes in foreign exchange rates and any changes in currency; a change in the Company’s fiscal year; litigation legal fees; pension expenses and any other items, each determined in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and as identified in the Company’s audited financial statements, including the notes thereto.

(d) Performance

Schedules

With respect to each Performance-Based Award, within ninety days after the beginning of the Performance Period for such Performance-Based Award, and in any case before twenty-five percent of such Performance Period has elapsed, the Committee shall establish the (i) Performance Targets, (ii) Target Award, and (iii) Performance Schedule, in each case for such Performance-Based Award, and shall make any other determinations required to be made within such period under section 162(m) of the Code.

(e) Committee Determinations

Determinations by the Committee as to the establishment of Performance Measures, Performance Targets, Target Awards, Performance Schedules, the level of actual achievement of Performance Targets and the amount payable with respect to a Performance-Based Award shall be recorded in writing. Specifically, the Committee shall certify in writing, in a manner conforming to applicable regulations under section 162(m) of the Code, prior to settlement of each such Performance-Based Award granted to a Covered Employee, that the Performance Targets and other material terms upon which settlement of the Incentive Award was conditioned have been satisfied.

10.	Adjustment upon Certain Changes

Subject to any action by IFF’s shareholders required by law, applicable tax rules or the rules of any exchange on which shares of Common Stock are then listed for trading:

(a) Shares Available for Grants

In the event of any change in the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding by reason of any extraordinary stock dividend or split, recapitalization, merger, consolidation,spin-off, combination, liquidation, dissolution, repurchase or exchange of shares or similar corporate change, the Committee shall, to the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, adjust any or all of (i) the maximum aggregate number or type of shares of Common Stock with respect to which the Committee may grant Incentive Awards, (ii) the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be covered by Options that are designated as “incentive stock options” within the meaning of section 422 of the Code (iii) the maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which the Committee may grant Incentive Awards to any individual Participant in any year and to anynon-employee director and (iv) any other limit set forth in Section 3, to the extent applicable. In the event of any change in the type or number of shares of Common Stock outstanding by reason of any other event or transaction, the Committee shall, to the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, make such adjustments to the type or number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which Incentive Awards may be granted.

(b) Increase or Decrease in Issued Shares Without Consideration

In the event of any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock resulting from a subdivision or consolidation of shares of Common Stock or the payment of an extraordinary stock dividend (but only on the shares of Common Stock), or any other increase or decrease in the number of such shares effected without receipt or payment of consideration by the Company, the Committee shall, to the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, adjust the type or number of shares of Common Stock subject to each outstanding Incentive Award and the exercise price per share of Common Stock of each such Incentive Award.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT I-15

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

In the event of (i) a dissolution or liquidation of the Company, (ii) a sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets (on a consolidated basis), (iii) a merger, consolidation or similar transaction involving the Company in which the holders of shares of Common Stock receive securities and/or other property, including cash, the Committee shall, to the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, have the power to:

(i) cancel, effective immediately prior to the occurrence of such event, each Incentive Award (whether or not then exercisable or vested), and, in full consideration of such cancellation, pay to the Participant to whom such Incentive Award was granted an amount in cash, for each share of Common Stock subject to such Incentive Award, equal to the value, as determined by the Committee, of such Incentive Award, provided that with respect to any outstanding Option such value shall be equal to the excess of (A) the value, as determined by the Committee, of the property (including cash) received by the holder of a share of Common Stock as a result of such event over (B) the exercise price of such Option, provided, however that with respect to any outstanding Option with an exercise price that equals or exceeds the value, as determined by the Committee, of the consideration received by a holder of a share of Common Stock as a result of such event, the Committee may cancel the Option without the payment of consideration; or

(ii) provide for the exchange of each Incentive Award (whether or not then exercisable or vested) for an Incentive Award with respect to (A) some or all of the property which a holder of the number of shares of Common Stock subject to such Incentive Award would have received in such transactionor (B) securities of the acquiror or surviving entity and, incident thereto, make an equitable adjustment as determined by the Committee in the exercise price of the Incentive Award, or the number of shares or amount of property subject to the Incentive Award or provide for a payment (in cash or other property) to the Participant to whom such Incentive Award was granted in partial consideration for the exchange of the Incentive Award.

(d) Other Changes

In the event of any change in the capitalization of the Company, corporate change, corporate transaction, extraordinary cash dividend, or other event other than those specifically referred to in Sections 10(a), (b) or (c), the Committee shall, to the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, make such adjustments in the number and class of shares subject to Incentive Awards outstanding on the date on which such change occurs and in such other terms of such Incentive Awards as the Committee deems appropriate.

(e) Cash Incentive Awards

In the event of any transaction or event described in this Section 10, including without limitation any corporate change referred to in paragraph (d) hereof, the Committee shall, to the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of any Cash Incentive Award as the Committee deems appropriate.

(e) No Other Rights

Except as expressly provided in the Plan or any Award Agreement, no Participant shall have any rights by reason of any subdivision or consolidation of shares of stock of any class, the payment of any dividends or dividend equivalents, any increase or decrease in the number of shares of stock of any class or any dissolution, liquidation, merger, or consolidation of the Company. Except as expressly provided in the Plan, no issuance by the Company of shares of stock of any class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, shall affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof shall be made with respect to, the number of shares or amount of other property subject to, or the terms related to, any Incentive Award.

I-16IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

(g) Savings Clause

No provision of this Section 10 shall be given effect to the extent that such provision would cause any tax to become due under section 409A of the Code.

With respect to any Performance-Based Awards granted to Covered Employees, no provision of this Section 10 shall be given effect to the extent that such provision would cause such Performance-Based Award to fail to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation under section 162(m) of the Code unless the Committee expressly acknowledges and affirms such consequences.

11.	Change in Control; Termination of Employment

(a) Change in Control

(1) Unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, the ESP if the Participant is a participant in the ESP, or a Participant’s then-effective employment, severance, or other similar agreement with the Company, in the event of a Change in Control of the Company in which the successor company assumes or substitutes for an Incentive Award (or in which the Company is the ultimate parent corporation and continues the Incentive Award), if a Participant’s employment with such successor company (or the Company) or a subsidiary thereof is terminated within twenty-four months following such Change in Control (or such other period set forth in the Award Agreement, including prior thereto if applicable) (x) by such successor company or a subsidiary thereof without Cause, or, (y) for those Participants who participate in the ESP, by the Participant for Good Reason: (i) Options and stock appreciation rights outstanding as of the date of such termination of employment will immediately vest, become fully exercisable, and may thereafter be exercised for the period of time set forth in connection with such termination under the Award Agreement, but in no event beyond the end of the regularly scheduled term of such Incentive Award), and (ii) the restrictions, limitations, and other conditions applicable to any Other Stock-Based Awards or any other Incentive Award, including those Incentive Awards (or portions thereof) deemed earned pursuant to Section 11(b) below, shall lapse, and such Other Stock-Based Awards or such other Incentive Awards shall become free of all restrictions, limitations, and conditions and become fully vested and transferable to the full extent of the original grant. For the avoidance of doubt, a termination of a Participant’s Employment as a result of the Participant’s death, disability, voluntary resignation, Normal Retirement or Early Retirement shall not be a termination “without Cause” for purposes of the Plan.

(2) Unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, in the event of a Change in Control of the Company to the extent the successor company does not assume or substitute for an Incentive Award (or in which the Company is the ultimate parent corporation and does not continue the Incentive Award), then immediately prior to the Change in Control: (i) those Options and stock appreciation rights outstanding as of the date of the Change in Control that are not assumed or substituted for (or continued) shall immediately vest and become fully exercisable for the period of time set forth in the Award Agreement, and (ii) the restrictions, other limitations and other conditions applicable to any Other Stock-Based Awards or any other Incentive Awards that are not assumed or substituted for (or continued) shall lapse, and such Other Stock-Based Awards or such other Incentive Awards shall become free of all restrictions, limitations, and conditions and become fully vested and transferable to the full extent of the original grant or, with respect to any Incentive Award subject to performance conditions, to the extent deemed earned pursuant to Section 11(b) below. Any Cash Incentive Awards, or portions thereof, deemed earned pursuant to Section 11(b) below and that become vested pursuant to this Section 11(a)(2) shall be paid and/or settled as soon as administratively practicable, but in no event later than thirty (30) calendar days following the date of the Change in Control.

(b) Effect of Change in Control on Performance Incentive Awards

With respect to any Incentive Award subject to performance conditions, unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, the ESP if the Participant is a participant in the ESP, or a

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT I-17

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

Participant’s then-effective employment, severance, or other similar agreement with the Company, in the event of a Change of Control of the Company (x) the Committee will determine as of the Change in Control, in its sole discretion, the deemed level of achievement of the applicable performance conditions underlying such Incentive Award and (y) the provisions of Section 11(a) shall apply to such Incentive Award or portion to the extent such performance conditions are deemed earned .

(1) Except as to any Incentive Awards constituting stock rights subject to section 409A of the Code, termination of Employment shall mean a separation from service within the meaning of section 409A of the Code. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee shall determine whether an authorized leave of absence, or absence in military or government service, shall constitute termination of Employment, provided that a Participant who is an employee will not be deemed to cease Employment in the case of any leave of absence approved by the Company. Furthermore, no payment shall be made with respect to any Incentive Awards under the Plan that are subject to section 409A of the Code as a result of any such authorized leave of absence or absence in military or government service unless such authorized leave or absence constitutes a separation from service for purposes of section 409A of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

(2) The Award Agreement or the ESP, if applicable, shall specify the consequences with respect to such Incentive Awards of the termination of Employment of the Participant holding the Incentive Awards.

(3) If a Participant is Employed by or provides services to a Person that is an Affiliate, a business unit, division or facility of IFF and such Person ceases to be an Affiliate, a business unit, division or facility of IFF, the Committee shall, in its sole discretion, determine whether the Employment of a Participant with the Company shall be deemed to have terminated for all purposes under the Plan. Subject to section 409A of the Code and unless otherwise determined by the Committee, a Participant who ceases to be an employee of the Company but continues, or simultaneously commences, services as a director on the Board of Directors shall not be deemed to have had a termination of Employment for purposes of the Plan and a Participant who ceases to be an employee of the Company but continues, or simultaneously commences, services as an independent contractor or consultant to the Company shall be deemed to have had a termination of Employment for purposes of the Plan.

12.	Award Agreements, Evidence of Incentive Awards and Acceptance of Incentive Award Terms

The Committee shall determine the appropriate instrument to document the issuance of an Incentive Award, including but not limited to the issuance of an Award Agreement. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, the Award Agreement or other instrument shall describe the specific terms and conditions of the Incentive Award, and may, subject to the terms of the Plan, describe the amount and form of the Incentive Award, vesting requirements, Performance Targets and Performance Periods, payment terms, rights upon termination of Employment (including Early Retirement and Normal Retirement), or provision of services by the Participant, and other terms specific to the Incentive Award; provided that the vesting period for any Stock Incentive Award shall be for a minimum of one (1) year from the date of grant unless, (a) the Stock Incentive Award was granted through the assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted to individuals who became employees of the Company as a result of a merger, consolidation, acquisition or other corporate transaction involving the Company, (b) the Stock Incentive Award was granted as an inducement to become an employee,non-employee director, consultant or other service provider to the Company, or (c) there exist other extraordinary or special circumstances, as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee or its designee. A Participant may be required to accept the terms of the Incentive Award and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement in order for an Incentive Award to become effective.

I-18IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

13.	Rights Under the Plan

No Person shall have any rights as a shareholder with respect to any shares of Common Stock covered by or relating to any Incentive Award until the date of the issuance of such shares on the books and records of IFF. Except as otherwise expressly provided in Section 10 hereof, no adjustment of any Incentive Award shall be made for dividends or other rights for which the record date occurs prior to the date of such issuance. Nothing in this Section 13 is intended, or should be construed, to limit authority of the Committee to cause the Company to make payments based on the dividends that would be payable with respect to any share of Common Stock if it were issued or outstanding, or from granting rights related to such dividends.

14.	Unfunded Status of Incentive Awards; Creation of Trusts

The Plan is intended to constitute an “unfunded” plan for incentive and deferred compensation, as applicable. With respect to any payments not yet made to a Participant or obligation to deliver shares of Common Stock pursuant to an Incentive Award, nothing contained in the Plan or any Incentive Award shall give any such Participant any rights that are greater than those of a general creditor of the Company; provided that the Committee may authorize the creation of trusts and deposit therein cash, shares of Common Stock, other Incentive Awards or other property, or make other arrangements to meet the Company’s obligations under the Plan. Such trusts or other arrangements shall be consistent with the “unfunded” status of the Plan unless the Committee otherwise determines with the consent of each affected Participant.

15.	No Special Employment Rights; No Right to Incentive Award

(a) Nothing contained in the Plan or any Award Agreement shall confer upon any Participant any right with respect to the continuation of his or her Employment by the Company or interfere in any way with the right of the Company at any time to terminate such Employment or to increase or decrease the compensation of the Participant from the rate in existence at the time of the grant of an Incentive Award.

(b) No person shall have any claim or right to receive an Incentive Award hereunder. The Committee’s granting of an Incentive Award to a Participant at any time shall neither require the Committee to grant an Incentive Award to such Participant or any other Participant or other person at any time nor preclude the Committee from making subsequent grants to such Participant or any other Participant or other person.

16.	Securities Matters

(a) IFF shall be under no obligation to affect the registration pursuant to the Securities Act of any shares of Common Stock to be issued hereunder or to effect similar compliance under any state or local laws. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, IFF shall not be obligated to cause to be issued shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Plan unless and until IFF is advised by its counsel that the issuance is in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations of governmental authority, and the requirements of any securities exchange on which shares of Common Stock are traded. The Committee may require, as a condition to the issuance of shares of Common Stock pursuant to the terms hereof, that the recipient of such shares make such covenants, agreements, and representations, and that any related certificates representing such shares bear such legends, as the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems necessary or desirable.

(b) The exercise or settlement of any Incentive Award (including, without limitation, any Option) granted hereunder shall only be effective at such time as counsel to IFF shall have determined that the issuance and delivery of shares of Common Stock pursuant to such exercise is in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations of governmental authority and the requirements of any securities exchange

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT I-19

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

on which shares of Common Stock are traded. IFF may, in its sole discretion, defer the effectiveness of any exercise or settlement of an Incentive Award granted hereunder in order to allow the issuance of shares pursuant thereto to be made pursuant to registration or an exemption from registration or other methods for compliance available under federal or state or local securities laws. IFF shall inform the Participant in writing of its decision to defer the effectiveness of the exercise or settlement of an Incentive Award granted hereunder. During the period that the effectiveness of the exercise of an Incentive Award has been deferred, the Participant may, by written notice, withdraw such exercise and obtain the refund of any amount paid with respect thereto.

17.	Certificates for Stock

Any Stock Incentive Award granted under the Plan may be evidenced in such manner as the Committee shall determine, including by issuing certificates or using book-entry. If the Committee evidences Stock Incentive Awards using Common Stock certificates, the Committee may require that such certificates bear an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions and restrictions, if applicable, to such Stock Incentive Award, that the Company retain physical possession of the certificates, and that the Participant deliver a stock power to the Company, endorsed in blank, relating to the Stock Incentive Award.

18.	Fractional Shares

No fractional shares of Common Stock shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Incentive Award. The Committee shall determine whether cash, other Incentive Awards or other property shall be issued or paid in lieu of such fractional shares of Common Stock or whether such fractional shares of Common Stock or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.

19.	No Personal Loans or Reloads

No Incentive Award shall provide for a personal loan to a Participant, including for payment of the exercise price of an Option or withholding taxes relating to any Incentive Award. No term of an Incentive Award shall provide for automatic “reload” grants of additional Incentive Awards upon exercise of an Option or stock appreciation right or otherwise as a term of an Incentive Award.

20.

Taxes

(a) Withholding

The Company is authorized to withhold from any Incentive Award granted, any payment relating to an Incentive Award under the Plan, including from a distribution of Common Stock, or any payroll or other payment to a Participant, amounts sufficient to satisfy the minimum federal, state,non-U.S. and local withholding tax requirements, and to take such other action (including without limitation providing for elective payment of such amounts by the Participant) as the Committee may deem advisable to enable the Company and Participants to satisfy the minimum federal, state,non-U.S. and local withholding tax requirements relating to any Incentive Award.

(b) Requirement of Notification Upon Disqualifying Disposition Under Code Section 421(b)

If any Participant shall make any disposition of shares of Common Stock delivered pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option under the circumstances described in section 421(b) of the Code (relating to certain disqualifying dispositions), such Participant shall notify the Company of such disposition within ten (10) days thereof.

21.	Section 83(b) Election

Except as otherwise provided in an Award Agreement or approved by the Committee, no election under section 83(b) of the Code or under a similar provision of the laws of a jurisdiction outside the

I-20IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

United States may be made with respect to any Incentive Award. In any case in which a Participant is permitted to make such an election in connection with an Incentive Award, the Participant shall notify the Company of such election within (10) ten days of filing notice of the election with the Internal Revenue Service or other governmental authority, in addition to any filing and notification required pursuant to regulations issued under section 83(b) of the Code or other applicable law.

22.	No Obligation to Exercise

The grant to a Participant of an Incentive Award shall impose no obligation upon such Participant to exercise such Incentive Award.

23.

Transfers

Except as otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, Incentive Awards may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution and may be exercised, during the lifetime of a Participant, only by the Participant or, if permissible under applicable law, by the Participant’s guardian or legal representative. Upon the death of a Participant, outstanding Incentive Awards granted to such Participant may be exercised only by the executors or administrators of the Participant’s estate or by any person or persons who shall have acquired such right to exercise by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. No transfer by will or the laws of descent and distribution of any Incentive Award, or the right to exercise any Incentive Award, shall be effective to bind the Company unless the Committee shall have been furnished with (a) written notice thereof and with a copy of the will and/or such evidence as the Committee may deem necessary to establish the validity of the transfer and (b) an agreement by the transferee to comply with all the terms and conditions of the Incentive Award that are or would have been applicable to the Participant and to be bound by the acknowledgements made by the Participant in connection with the grant of the Incentive Award.

24.	Expenses and Receipts

The expenses of the Plan shall be paid by the Company. Any proceeds received by the Company in connection with any Incentive Award will be used for general corporate purposes.

25.	Failure to Comply

In addition to the remedies of the Company elsewhere provided for herein, failure by a Participant to comply with any of the terms and conditions of the Plan or any Award Agreement shall be grounds for the cancellation and forfeiture of such Incentive Award, in whole or in part, as the Committee, in its absolute discretion, may determine.

26.	Right of Setoff

The Company may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, deduct from and set off against any amounts the Company may owe to the Participant from time to time, including amounts payable in connection with any Incentive Award, owed as wages, fringe benefits, or other compensation owed to the Participant, such amounts as may be owed by the Participant to the Company, including but not limited to amounts owed under Section 32, although the Participant shall remain liable for any part of the Participant’s payment obligation not satisfied through such deduction and setoff. By accepting any Incentive Award granted under the Plan, the Participant agrees to any deduction or setoff under this Section 26.

27.	Relationship to Other Benefits

No payment with respect to any Incentive Awards under the Plan shall be taken into account in determining any benefits under any pension, retirement, profit sharing, group insurance, or other benefit

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT I-21

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

plan of the Company except as otherwise specifically provided in such other plan. Nothing in the Plan shall limit the right of the Company to pay compensation of any kind outside the terms of the Plan.

28.	Governing Law

The Plan and the rights of all persons under the Plan shall be construed and administered in accordance with the laws of the State of New York without regard to its conflict of law principles.

29.	Severability

If all or any part of this Plan is declared by any court or governmental authority to be unlawful or invalid, such unlawfulness or invalidity shall not serve to invalidate any portion of this Plan not declared to be unlawful or invalid. Any Section or part of a Section so declared to be unlawful or invalid shall, if possible, be construed in a manner that will give effect to the terms of such Section or part of a Section to the fullest extent possible while remaining lawful and valid.

30.	Effective Date and Term of Plan

The “Effective Date” of the Plan is March 11, 2015. No grants of Incentive Awards may be made under the Plan after March 11, 2025.

31.	Amendment or Termination of the Plan

The Board of Directors may at any time suspend, terminate or discontinue the Plan or revise, modify or amend the Plan or any Incentive Award in any respect whatsoever;provided,however, that to the extent that any applicable law, tax requirement, or rule of a stock exchange requires shareholder approval in order for any such revision or amendment to be effective, such revision or amendment shall not be effective without such approval, which shall be submitted to the Company’s shareholders no later than the earliest annual meeting for which the record date is after the date of such action by the Board of Directors. The preceding sentence shall not restrict the Committee’s ability to exercise its discretionary authority hereunder pursuant to Section 4 hereof, which discretion may be exercised without amendment to the Plan. No provision of this Section 31 shall be given effect to the extent that such provision would cause any tax to become due under section 409A of the Code. Except as expressly provided in the Plan, no amendment hereunder may, without the consent of a Participant, materially adversely affect the Participant’s rights under any outstanding Incentive Award granted prior to such amendment.

32.	Forfeiture and Clawback

(a) Forfeiture and Clawback of Incentive Awards.

Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, each Incentive Award granted to (i) a Participant who is designated by the Company as job level 7 or above, or (ii) to any other Participant, as may be determined by the Committee from time to time in its sole discretion, shall, in each case, be subject to the forfeiture and clawback provisions set forth in this Section 32.

(b) Covenant and Policy Violations. A Participant’s failure to comply with any of the following obligations shall be considered a “Covenant Forfeiture Event”:

(1) The Participant acting directly or indirectly, shall not, during the Participant’s Employment and the twelve month period following the Participant’s termination of Employment, become employed by, render services for, serve as an agent or consultant to, or become a partner, member, principal, shareholder or other owner of any of the following entities: Firmenich, S.A., Givaudan, S.A., V. Mane Fils, S.A., Robertet, S.A., Symrise A.G., Takasago International Corporation, Wild Flavors GmbH, Sensient Technologies Corporation, any of their respective Affiliates, or any other entity that is competitive with the Company, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion from time to time.

I-22IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

(2) The Participant, acting directly or indirectly, shall not, during the Participant’s Employment and the twenty-four month period following the Participant’s termination of Employment, (A) solicit, induce, divert, employ or retain, or interfere with or attempt to influence the relationship of the Company, with any Person or entity that is or was, during the last twelve months of the Participant’s Employment with the Company, (i) an employee of the Company or (ii) a Person engaged to provide services to the Company; or (B) interfere with or attempt to influence the relationship of the Company with any customer, supplier or other Person with whom the Company does business.

(3) The Participant shall not, at any time, directly or indirectly (a) disclose any Confidential Information (as defined below) to any Person (other than, only with respect to the period that the Participant is Employed, to an employee or outside advisor of the Company who requires such information to perform his or her duties for the Company) or (b) use, sell or otherwise transfer, any Confidential Information for the Participant’s own benefit or the benefit of any third party. “Confidential Information,” shall mean confidential, proprietary or commercially sensitive information relating to the Company, or its employees, board members, customers, vendors, or other business partners and its businesses, operations, or affairs, including, without limitation, information relating to products, formulations, protocols, processes, designs, formulae, ideas, know-how, test methods, evaluation techniques, patents, trade secrets, scientific or technical data, regardless of the form in which it is maintained or provided, orally or in writing, whether prepared by the Company, a third party or the Participant, together with all analyses, compilations, notes and other documents relating thereto.

(4) The Participant shall cooperate with the Company by making himself or herself available to testify on behalf of the Company in any action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative, and shall not otherwise fail to assist the Company in any such action, suit, or proceeding by providing information and meeting and consulting with members of management of, other representatives of, or counsel to, the Company, as reasonably requested.

(5) The Participant shall not, during his or her Employment, engage in willful misconduct or violation of a Company policy that is materially detrimental to the Company or in any action or inaction that would constitute grounds for being terminated for Cause, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

(6) The Participant shall, upon termination of Employment, execute any documentation reasonably requested by the Company and return to the Company all property of the Company, its customers and vendors in the Participant’s possession or control including, without limitation, all materials, work product or documents containing or pertaining to Confidential Information, and including without limitation, any Company car, all computers (including laptops), cell phones, keys, PDAs, Blackberries, iPhones, Androids, iPads, credit cards, printers, facsimile machines, televisions, card access to any Company building, customer lists, reports, files, emails, work papers, memoranda, notes, formulae, tapes, programs, records and software, computer access codes or disks, instructional manuals, and other similar materials or documents used, received or prepared or supervised by the Participant in connection with Participant’s work for the Company. The Participant shall not retain any copies, duplicates, reproductions or excerpts of any of the aforementioned materials or documents and shall not at any time use, recreate or reproduce any said materials or documents.

(1) Due to Participant’s Failure to Comply with Obligations. If a Participant fails to comply with any of the obligations set forth in Section 32(b), the Participant will forfeit or repay, as the case may be, all Incentive Awards, whether vested or unvested, paid or unpaid, in each case, that were settled, paid or granted by the Company during the 24 month period immediately prior to the Participant’s first act or omission that violates any of Section 32(b) through the date on which the Company discovers the Participant’s last violation, and the Company shall have no further obligations to pay, grant or settle any Incentive Awards under this Plan.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT I-23

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

(2) Due to an Accounting Restatement or Misstatement. If the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement, or if the Company determines that it has misstated its financial results, whether or not as a result of misconduct on the part of the Participant (an “Accounting Forfeiture Event” and, together with a Covenant Forfeiture Event, a “Forfeiture Event”), then, the Participant shall forfeit or repay the Excess Compensation (as defined below) in respect of all Incentive Awards, whether vested or unvested, paid or unpaid, that were granted, settled or paid during the period commencing on the first day of the12-month period covered by such misstated financial statement through the later of (i) the date of the filing of a restatement where an accounting restatement is required to be filed; (ii) the date of the discovery of the misstated financials where any accounting restatement is not required to be filed; or (iii) any later date as may be required by applicable law, including the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

(3) For purposes of this Section 32(c)(2), the term “Excess Compensation” means with respect to each Incentive Award, the difference between (A) the Fair Market Value of the cash or shares of Common Stock granted, paid or delivered to or received by the Participant with respect to an Incentive Award less (B) the Fair Market Value of the cash or shares of Common Stock that would have been granted, paid or delivered to or received by the Participant had the financial statements requiring the misstatement or restatement been properly stated, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

(4) Any clawback or recoupment provisions required by law, including under theDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or any rules or regulations thereunder, shall apply to the Incentive Awards granted under the Plan and any policy of the Company providing for forfeiture or recoupment of compensation shall not be deemed limited in any way by this Section 32 or any other provision of this Plan.

(5) Any Incentive Awards, cash or shares of Common Stock (A) subject to repayment by the Participants under this Section 32 must be repaid to the Company (less any amount paid by the Participant to the Company as a condition of or in connection with settlement of a repaid Incentive Award), in the manner and on such terms and conditions as shall be required by the Company by written notice to the Participant and (B) subject to forfeiture will be forfeited immediately upon written notice to the Participant from the Company.

(6) For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in any agreement with the Company, or in any Company policy, including this Plan shall be deemed to prohibit or restrict a Participant from lawfully communicating truthful information, or cooperating with, or otherwise assisting in an investigation by any governmental agency or self-regulatory organization regarding a possible violation of law or responding to any inquiry from any such organization, and a Participant’s doing so shall not constitute a Forfeiture Event. If a Participant communicates any Confidential Information to a governmental agency or self-regulatory agency pursuant to this Section, the Participant shall notify the agency of the confidentiality of such Confidential Information and ask the agency to also protect the confidentiality of such Confidential Information.

(7) In accordance with the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016, a Participant will not be held criminally or civilly liable under any federal or state trade secret law for disclosure of a trade secret that: (i) is made (A) in confidence to a federal, state, or local government official, either directly or indirectly, or to an attorney, and (B) solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law; or (ii) is made in a complaint or other document that is filed under seal in a lawsuit or other proceeding. If a Participant files a lawsuit for retaliation by the Company for reporting a suspected violation of law, the Participant may disclose the Company’s trade secrets to his or her attorney and use the trade secret information in the court proceeding if the Participant (a) files any document containing the trade secret under seal, and (b) does not disclose the trade secret, except pursuant to court order.

(d) Agreement Does Not Prohibit Competition or Other Participant Activities. A Participant is not prohibited from engaging in an activity identified in Section 32(b) solely as a result of such provision.

I-24IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT

ANNEX I – FRENCH SUB-PLAN UNDER THE 2015 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN

Rather, thenon-occurrence of the Forfeiture Events set forth in Section 32(b) is a condition to the Participant’s right to realize and retain value from his or her Incentive Awards, and the consequence under the Plan if the Participant engages in an activity giving rise to any such Forfeiture Event are the forfeitures specified herein. The Company and the Participant shall not be precluded by this provision or otherwise from entering into other agreements concerning the subject matter of Section 32.

(e) No Limitation of Rights. Any forfeiture or repayment under this Section 32 is in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other remedies or rights that may be available to the Company under applicable law, including, without limitation, the right to (i) dismiss the Participant, (ii) adjust the future compensation of the Participant, or (iii) take such other action to enforce the Participant’s obligations to Company as the Company may deem appropriate in view of the facts and circumstances surrounding the particular situation.

(f) Committee Discretion. The Committee shall have the authority, in its sole discretion, to interpret and construe the provisions of this Section 32 and to make all determinations with respect hereto, including the determination of whether a Forfeiture Event has occurred, the timing of such Forfeiture Event and the amount and form of any forfeiture or reimbursement to be made to the Company from a Participant. The Committee may consider such factors as it deems relevant in making such determinations, including the factors contributing to the Forfeiture Event, harm or potential harm to the Company, the nature and severity of a Participant’s behavior or conduct, legal and tax considerations and other facts and circumstances relating to a particular situation. All interpretations, constructions and determinations made by the Committee hereunder shall be final and binding on the Company and the Participant and the determinations of the Committee need not be uniform with respect to all Participants or situations. The Committee may waive in whole or in part the Company’s right of recapture or impose additional conditions on an Incentive Award granted or paid to a Participant under this Plan.

33.	Incentive Awards to Participants Outside the United States

The Committee may modify the terms of any Incentive Award under the Plan made to or held by a Participant who is then resident or primarily employed outside of the United States or is subject to taxation by anon-U.S. jurisdiction in any manner deemed by the Committee to be necessary or appropriate in order that such Incentive Award shall conform to laws, regulations, sound business practices and customs of the country in which the Participant is then resident or primarily employed, or so that the value and other benefits of the Incentive Award to the Participant, as affected by foreign tax laws and other restrictions applicable as a result of the Participant’s residence or Employment abroad shall be comparable to the value of such an Incentive Award to a Participant who is resident or primarily employed in the United States. An Incentive Award may be modified under this Section 33 in a manner that is inconsistent with the express terms of the Plan, so long as such modifications will not contravene any applicable law or regulation or result in actual liability under section 16(b) of the Exchange Act for the Participant whose Incentive Award is modified.

IFF | 2017 PROXY STATEMENT I-25


*INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.* *521 WEST 57TH STREET* *NEW YORK, NY 10019*		VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com Use the internet to transmit your voting instructions up until the date and time indicated on the reverse side. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions.
		ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically viae-mail. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive shareholder communications electronically in future years.
		VOTE BY PHONE -1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until the date and time indicated on the reverse side. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
		VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, by the date and time indicated on the reverse side.
		VOTE IN PERSON You may vote the shares in person by attending the Annual Meeting.



~~TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:~~		~~E03614-P76126 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS~~


~~DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY~~

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

E19925-P89439 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR all listed nominees, FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 5 and FOR 1 ~~2, and 3.~~YEAR on Proposal 4.

Elect eleven members of the Board of Directors for aone-year term expiring at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Nominees:

For

Against

Abstain

For

Against

Abstain

1a.

1b.

1c.

1d.

1e.

1f.

1g.

1h.

1i.

1j.

1k.

Marcello V. Bottoli

Dr. Linda Buck

Michael L. Ducker

David R. Epstein

Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.

John F. Ferraro

Andreas Fibig

Christina Gold

Henry W. Howell, Jr.

Katherine M. Hudson

Dale F. Morrison

☐

Ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2017 fiscal year.

☐

1. ~~Election of Directors~~

Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers in 2016.

☐

~~Nominees:~~

~~For~~

~~Against~~

~~Abstain~~

~~For~~

~~Against~~

~~Abstain~~

~~1a.~~

~~Marcello V. Bottoli~~

~~To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.~~

~~1b.~~

~~Dr. Linda Buck~~

1 Year

2 Years

3 Years

Abstain

~~1c.~~

~~Michael L. Ducker~~

~~Advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers in 2015.~~

~~1d.~~

~~David R. Epstein~~

Vote, on an advisory basis, on the frequency of votes on executive compensation.

☐

~~1e.~~

~~Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.~~

For

Against

Abstain

~~1f.~~

~~John F. Ferraro~~

Approve a FrenchSub-Plan under the 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan.

☐

~~1g.~~

~~Andreas Fibig~~

~~1h.~~

~~Christina Gold~~

NOTE:Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

~~1i.~~

~~Henry W. Howell, Jr.~~

~~1j.~~

~~Katherine M. Hudson~~

~~1k.~~

~~Dale F. Morrison~~

For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.

☐

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.

☐

~~Yes~~

Yes

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please add your title as such. When signing as joint tenants, all parties in the joint tenancy must sign. If signer is a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by duly authorized officer.

~~Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]~~

~~Date~~

~~Signature (Joint Owners)~~

~~Date~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~ADMISSION TICKET~~

~~INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.~~

~~ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS~~

~~MAY 2, 2016 AT 3:00 P.M. LOCAL TIME/9:00 A.M. EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME~~

~~INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.~~

~~61 RUE DE VILLIERS~~

~~NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE, FRANCE~~

~~ADMITS ONE SHAREHOLDER~~



~~Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:~~ ~~The Notice and Proxy Statement, Annual Report and Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.~~



		~~E03615-P76126~~
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]	Date		Signature (Joint Owners)	Date


		~~INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.~~ ~~THIS PROXY CARD/VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM IS SOLICITED~~ ~~ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS~~ ~~ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS~~ ~~MAY 2, 2016~~ The undersigned hereby appoint(s) each of Mr. Andreas Fibig, Ms. Alison A. Cornell and Ms. Anne Chwat as the attorney and proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote the number of shares of stock the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. to be held at 61 rue de Villiers, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France on Monday, May 2, 2016 at 3:00 P.M. Local Time/9:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, and any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof (the “Meeting”). IF YOU ARE A SHAREHOLDER OF RECORD, THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THE REVERSE SIDE. IF NO SUCH DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR, FOR ITEMS 2 AND 3 AND ACCORDING TO THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS ON ANY OTHER MATTER THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. VOTING INSTRUCTIONS MUST BE RECEIVED BY 11:59 P.M. EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME ON MAY 1, 2016. If you are a participant in the International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. Retirement Investment Fund Plans (the “401(k) Plans”), this proxy covers all shares for which the undersigned has the right to give voting instructions to Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, the trustee of the 401(k) Plans. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted as directed by the undersigned on the reverse side. Shares in the 401(k) Plans for which voting instructions are not received by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on April 28, 2016, or if no choice is specified, will be voted by the trustee in the same proportion as the shares for which voting instructions are received from other participants in the applicable 401(k) Plan. ~~PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD/VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM PROMPTLY USING THE~~ ~~ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE.~~
		~~Address Changes/Comments:~~ ADMISSION TICKET INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC. ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS MAY 3, 2017 AT 10:00 A.M. EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC. 533 WEST 57^th STREET NEW YORK, NY 10019 ADMITS ONE SHAREHOLDER

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement, Annual Report and Form10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.

E19926-P89439

INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC.

THIS PROXY CARD/VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM IS SOLICITED

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

MAY 3, 2017

The undersigned hereby appoint(s) each of Mr. Andreas Fibig and Ms. Anne Chwat as the attorney and proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote the number of shares of stock the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. to be held at the headquarters of the Company on Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 10:00 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, and any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof (the “Meeting”).

IF YOU ARE A SHAREHOLDER OF RECORD, THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THE REVERSE SIDE. IF NO SUCH DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR, FOR PROPOSALS 2, 3 AND 5 AND FOR 1 YEAR FOR PROPOSAL 4 ACCORDING TO THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS ON ANY OTHER MATTER THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. VOTING INSTRUCTIONS MUST BE RECEIVED BY 11:59 P.M. EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME ON MAY 2, 2017.

If you are a participant in the International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. Retirement Investment Fund Plans (the “401(k) Plans”), this proxy covers all shares for which the undersigned has the right to give voting instructions to Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, the trustee of the 401(k) Plans. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted as directed by the undersigned on the reverse side. Shares in the 401(k) Plans for which voting instructions are not received by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on April 30, 2017, or if no choice is specified, will be voted by the trustee in the same proportion as the shares for which voting instructions are received from other participants in the applicable 401(k) Plan.

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD/VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM PROMPTLY USING THE

ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE.



		Address Changes/Comments:
	~~(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)~~



	~~CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE~~

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE



¨☐		Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨
☐		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x
☒		Definitive Proxy Statement
¨
☐		Definitive Additional Materials
¨
☐		Soliciting Material under § 240.14a-12



	(1)	Amount Previously Paid:

	(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

~~(3) Filing Party:~~

~~(4) Date Filed~~




~~Date and Time~~:	~~Monday, May 2, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. local time / 9:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time~~
~~Place~~:	~~61 rue de Villiers, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France~~
~~Record Date~~:	~~March 8, 2016~~
~~Voting~~:	~~Each share of our common stock outstanding at~~ the close of business on March 8, ~~2016 has one vote on each matter that is properly submitted for a~~2017 may vote at the 2017 Annual Meeting Sincerely, Andreas Fibig Chairman and Chief Executive Officer March 20, 2017		Live Audio Webcast A live audio webcast of our 2017 Annual Meeting will be available on our website,www.iff.com, starting at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time and a replay will also be available on our website. Proxy Voting It is important that your shares be represented at the 2017 Annual Meeting, regardless of the number of shares you may hold. Whether or not you plan to attend, please vote using the Internet, by telephone or by mail, in each case by following the instructions in our proxy statement. Doing so will not prevent you from voting your shares in person if you are present. Advance Voting Methods
		Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 3, 2017: Our Notice, Proxy Statement and 2016 Annual ~~Meeting.~~Report are available atwww.proxyvote.com. We are making the Proxy Statement and the form of proxy first available on or about March 20, 2017.


2016 Financial Metric (GAAP)	(Dollars in Millions Except Earnings Per Share Amounts)	Change vs. Prior Year
Net Sales	$3,116	3%
Operating Profit	$567	(4)%
Diluted Net Earnings Per Share	$5.05	(2)%


During 2016, we accelerated the total payout ratio as a percentage of adjusted net income. ØDividends – Increased dividend by 15% to provide a more competitive yield while balancing growth objectives. ØShare Repurchases – Executed against existing repurchase program to supplement dividend payout. ØTotal Payout Ratio – The combination of dividend and share repurchases totaled 71% in 2016, above our targeted range of 50% to 60% of adjusted net income.*	~~Page Reference~~ ~~(for more details)~~
~~Election of Directors~~	~~FOR each Director Nominee~~	5
~~Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm~~	~~FOR~~	25
~~Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation~~	~~FOR~~	50



¨☐		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.



	(1)		Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

	(2)		Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

	(3)		Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

	(4)		Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

	(5)		Total fee paid:



¨☐		Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.



(3)	~~International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.~~ ~~521 West 57th Street~~ ~~New York, NY 10019~~ Filing Party:
	(4)	Date Filed:



	~~Sincerely,~~

	~~Andreas Fibig~~
	~~Chairman and Chief Executive Officer~~


~~Matter~~		~~Board Recommendation~~We provide below highlights of certain information in this Proxy Statement. As it is only a summary, please refer to the complete Proxy Statement and 2016 Annual Report before you vote.


▪ *Pillar*		*2016 Achievements*
“*Innovating ~~Firsts” —~~Firsts*		• Achieved growth in encapsulation-related and modulation portfolio sales • Launched and commercialized four flavor modulators • Commercialized four captive fragrance ingredients
~~strengthening~~ *Win Where We Compete*		• Achieved growth in North America Consumer Fragrance • Strengthened our position ~~and driving differentiation~~ in ~~priority R&D platforms:~~


▪	~~We launched four new captive and proprietary Fragrance Ingredient molecules.~~


▪	~~Sales of our Flavors sweetness and savory modulation portfolio improved strong double-digits as we added two new natural taste modulators.~~


▪	~~Proprietary Flavors delivery systems grew strong double-digits globally given the expansion into additional categories.~~


▪	~~We fortified our market share position in North American Flavors, one of our key markets, with our acquisition of Ottens Flavors.~~


▪	~~We continued to leverage our long-standing presence in emerging markets, which grew 5% on a currency neutral basis, led by double digit growth in the Middle East and Africa.~~


▪	~~From a category perspective, Home Care improved high single digits globally on a currency neutral basis.~~


▪	~~We continued our commitment to sustainability and innovation, winning multiple global sustainability certifications.~~


▪	~~Our largest Flavors customer awarded us an innovation award for North America.~~


▪			~~During 2015, we negotiated and closed two acquisitions that fit into our Vision 2020 strategy.~~


▪	Our acquisition of Lucas Meyer Cosmetics expanded our ingredients offerings into the cosmetic industry thereby allowing us to build greater customer intimacy and entry into the skin care and hair care businesses.



(dollars in millions except earnings per share amounts)	2013			2014			2015
Net Sales		$2,953			$3,089			$3,023
Currency Neutral Sales Growth*	5		%	5		%	5		%
Diluted Net Earnings Per Share - as Reported		$4.29			$5.06			$5.16
Diluted Net Earnings Per Share - as Adjusted*		$4.46			$5.08			$5.25
Operating Profit - as Reported		$516			$592			$588
Operating Profit - as Adjusted*		$540			$601			$612
Net Cash Provided by Operations		$408			$518			$434



	~~Page~~
~~I. ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION~~	1
~~II. PROPOSAL I — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS~~	5
~~III. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE~~	11
~~Corporate Governance Guidelines~~	11
~~Independence of Directors~~	11
~~Other Information~~	11
~~Board Leadership Structure~~	12
~~Board Committees~~	12
Ø Annual Board and Committee ~~Meetings~~	13 Assessments Ø Proxy AccessBy-Law Provisions
~~Audit Committee~~ Ø Majority Voting and Director Resignation Policy in Uncontested Elections	13	Ø No Limitation on Shareholder Litigation Rights
~~Compensation Committee~~ Ø Diverse Board Brings Balance of Skills, Professional Experience and Perspectives	14	Ø Prohibit Short Sales or Hedging of Our Stock By Our Employees, Officers and Directors
~~Nominating~~ Ø 100% Attendance at Board Meetings by Incumbent Directors		Ø Executive Officers and ~~Governance Committee~~	16 Directors are Subject to Rigorous Stock Retention Guidelines
Ø 93% Overall Attendance at Committee Meetings by Incumbent Directors		Ø Independent Lead Director ~~Candidates~~	16 Facilitates and Strengthens the Board’s Independent Oversight
~~Risk Management Oversight~~ Ø No Exclusive Forum orFee-Shifting Provisions	18	Ø Comprehensive Executive Clawback Policy Ø Long-Standing Commitment to Sustainability
~~Related Person Transactions~~ Ø No Shareholder Rights Plan (“Poison Pill”)	19
~~Code of Business Conduct and Ethics~~	19
~~Share Retention Policy~~	20
~~Equity Grant Policy~~	20
~~Policy Regarding Derivatives, Short Sales, Hedging and Pledges~~	20
~~IV. DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION~~	20
~~Annual Director Cash and Equity Compensation~~	21
~~Annual Committee Chair and Lead Director Compensation~~	21
~~Participation in our Deferred Compensation Plan~~	21
~~Other~~	21
~~V. SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT, DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN OTHER PERSONS~~	23
~~VI. PROPOSAL II — RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM~~	25
~~Principal Accountant Fees and Services~~	26
~~Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures for Audit and Permitted Non-Audit Services~~	27
~~Audit Committee Report~~	27
~~VII. COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS~~	29
~~Compensation Committee Report~~	49
~~VIII. PROPOSAL III — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~	50
~~IX. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~	51
~~Summary Compensation Table~~	51
~~All Other Compensation~~	53
~~Employment Agreements or Arrangements~~	54
~~Grants of Plan-Based Awards~~	54
~~Long-Term Incentive Plan~~	56
~~Equity Compensation Plan Information~~	58
~~Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End~~	59
~~Option Exercises and Stock Vested~~	61
~~Pension Benefits~~	61
~~Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation~~	63
~~Potential Payments upon Termination and Change in Control~~	64 Ø Formal Succession Planning



	~~Page~~
~~X. OTHER MATTERS~~	72
~~Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance~~	72
~~Proxy Solicitation Costs~~	72
~~Shareholder Proposals~~	72
~~Shareholder Communications~~	73
~~Electronic Delivery~~	73
~~Householding~~	73
~~Available Information~~	73
~~EXHIBIT A: GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations~~


A:	~~At the 2016 Annual Meeting you will be asked to vote on the following proposals. Our Board recommendation for each of these proposals is set forth below.~~



Proposal 1 Election of 11 Director Nominees
Proposal 1 Election of 11 Director Nominees	~~Proposal~~		The Board ~~Recommendation~~ recommends a vote FOR the election of all Director Nominees Our Nominating and Governance Committee and our Board have determined that each of the nominees possesses the skills and qualifications to collectively comprise a highly effective Board
1.	~~To elect eleven members of the Board of Directors, each to hold office for a one-year term expiring at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.~~	~~FOR each Director Nominee~~See “Proposal 1–Election of Directors” beginning on page 1 of this Proxy Statement


Q:	~~What constitutes a quorum, and why is a quorum required?~~


Q:	~~What is the difference between a “shareholder of record” and a “street name” holder?~~


Q:	~~What are the requirements to elect the director nominees and to approve each of the proposals in this proxy statement?~~


What We Do				A significant portion of the compensation for our NEOs in the form ofat-risk variable compensation
				Variable compensation based on multiple performance metrics to encourage balanced incentives
				Appropriate mix of fixed and variable compensation to reward company, business unit and individual performance
				Majority of variable compensation awarded as equity-based awards
				Executive clawback policies to recoup cash and equity compensation upon certain triggering events
				Executives required to meet share retention guidelines
				Independent compensation consultant
				Annual risk assessment of compensation programs
What We Don’t Do				No taxgross-ups for NEOs for severance payments
				No single-trigger vesting of cash or equity-based awards upon change in control
				No short-sales, hedging or pledging of our stock by our employees, officers or directors
				No fixed-duration employment agreements with executive officers
				No stock option/SAR repricing or exchange of underwater options or SARs for cash without shareholder approval


Proxy Statement Summary			i

Proposal 1 — Election of Directors			1
Our Current Board			1
Director and Nominee Experience and Qualifications			1
Nominees for Director			4

Corporate Governance			15
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics			15
Shareholder Engagement			15
Sustainability Initiatives			15
Corporate Governance Guidelines			16
Independence of Directors			16
Board Leadership Structure			17
Board Committees			18
Board and Committee Meetings			19
Audit Committee			20
Compensation Committee			21
Nominating and Governance Committee			23
Board and Committee Assessment Process			24
Succession Planning			24
Risk Management Oversight			24
Related Person Transactions and Other Information			25
Share Retention Policy			26
Equity Grant Policy			27
Policy Regarding Derivatives, Short Sales, Hedging and Pledges			27

Directors’ Compensation			28
Director Compensation Program			28
2016 Directors’ Compensation			29

Securities Ownership			31
Directors and Executive Officers			31
5% Shareholders			33

Proposal 2—Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		~~Majority of Votes Cast~~	34
	3.	~~Say on Pay~~ Selection of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		~~Majority of Votes Cast~~	34

		35
Audit Committee Report			36

Q:Compensation Discussion and Analysis	~~What if I am a beneficial owner and I do not give the nominee voting instructions?~~

		38
A: Compensation Committee Report	If you are a beneficial owner and your shares are held in “street name,” the Broker is bound by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) regarding whether or not it can exercise discretionary voting power for any particular proposal if the Broker has not received voting instructions from you. Brokers have the authority to vote shares for which their customers do not provide voting instructions on certain routine matters. A broker non-vote occurs when a Broker returns a proxy but does not vote on a particular proposal because the Broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the proposal and has not received specific voting instructions for the proposal from the beneficial owner of the shares. Broker non-votes are considered to be present at the meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but are not counted as votes cast.		63

~~Criteria~~

~~Threshold (25%)~~

~~Target (100%)~~

~~Maximum (200%)~~

~~Cumulative TSR vs. S&P 500~~

~~35th percentile~~

~~55th percentile~~

~~75th percentile~~